User:Thingg/dashboard
CAVEAT: all the |show= parameters have been set to 7 days.
AB = Administrative Backlogs
[edit]Administrative backlog
[edit]AIV= Administrator intervention against vandalism
Reports
[edit]User-reported
[edit]- 2409:408C:8DB0:687:9C5A:93D:3B43:6D85 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – vandalism after final warning; account is evidently a spambot or a compromised account. [1][2][3][4][5]. ®asteem Talk 19:51, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
No vandalism since final warning. Re-report if this user resumes vandalising. The edit that led to that final warning is the last edit they've made. Daniel Case (talk) 20:34, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- 80.117.203.138 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) all edits are external spam links and continuing adding spam links after final warnings. Cassiopeia talk 23:25, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
Edits are not vandalism. Please ensure recent edits constitute vandalism before re-reporting. Adding links to the official music video uploads on YouTube may or may not be appropriate per consensus, but these additions do not appear to be spam as described in Wikipedia:Spam - Aoidh (talk) 02:35, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- 76.78.92.169 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On Hole Hearted (diff): vandalism after final warning. Binksternet (talk) 03:59, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
Insufficient recent activity to warrant a block. Only three edits in the last month and this is the only one reverted since September 6. The one and only warning on their talk page is stale. Ad Orientem (talk) 04:06, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- 188.207.73.249 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On That '70s Show: vandalism after final warning. Blanking content after final warning. Meters (talk) 05:37, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- 2001:8003:2448:BF01:38D6:5833:8D92:AB48 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On F9 (film) (diff): still blocked as Special:Contributions/2001:8003:2448:BF01:3014:B8F5:EDDA:F15D. Geraldo Perez (talk) 06:13, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Maithil hoon (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – On Maithili language: vandalism after final warning; actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. I am writing to report a user who is persistently vandalizing Wikipedia pages related to the Maithili language. This user is adding unsourced data, inflating the number of speakers without any credible sources, and removing the actual Census figures. Additionally, they are including misleading linguistic maps that encompass several non-Maithili speaking districts. Despite several warnings, this user continues to edit Wikipedia according to their own preferences. They are also not seeking consensus on the talk page, even after I have informed them about this several times. I believe a temporary block is necessary to prevent further damage. Kusinara (talk) 06:49, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- 100.33.13.192 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – vandalism after final warning. See filter log. Annh07 (talk) 06:57, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- 83.137.6.236 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On Bluebird K7 (diff): vandalism after final warning. edit warring whilst logged out. Theroadislong (talk) 07:03, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- 2409:40C0:2A:A093:4C21:EFBC:7E25:DC10 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – account is evidently a spambot or a compromised account. adds external links to the business they (presumably) work for to articles. Sirocco745 (talk) 07:14, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- 2601:8C0:1:9E10:1861:2E8F:7218:874D (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – section blanking at [6] and disrupting a file at [7]. Sirocco745 (talk) 09:42, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- 91838jeu72737 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Redirect vandal. Skywatcher68 (talk) 09:52, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
CSD= Candidates for speedy deletion ; PROD= Proposed deletions
| Candidates for speedy deletion | Entries |
|---|---|
| User requested | 1 |
| Empty articles | 0 |
| Nonsense pages | 0 |
| Spam pages | 0 |
| Importance or significance not asserted | 2 |
| Other candidates | 10 |
The following articles have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days:
( source / chronological order / expired )
{{CSD backlogs}} 7 backlognav + 2 + 5 single cat
| BLP articles proposed for deletion by days left – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files with unknown source – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files missing permission – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Disputed non-free Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Orphaned non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Replaceable non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Proposed deletion – No backlog currently |
|---|
Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 24 items
Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old – 1 item
Requested RD1 redactions – 20 items
Expired proposed deletions of unsourced BLPs – No backlog currently
UAA= Usernames for administrator attention ; RFPP= Requests for page protection
- Kamala Harrison (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, please be careful in blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 17:00, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
This username matched "clinton|hillary|hilary|trump|drumpf|biden|obama|kamala" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 17:00, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
Note on file possible reference to former or current U.S. president, VP, or candidate - please review -- DQB (owner / report) 17:00, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- MichalSzesnastkiTheEditor (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
User-reported
[edit]- Dosy Bikes (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Submitted User:Dosy Bikes/sandbox to AfC about dosybikes.com. KylieTastic (talk) 09:20, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- AegisenTech (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Spammy user page. Wikishovel (talk) 09:39, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Everdots Digital (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Spammy user page. Wikishovel (talk) 10:11, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
 | This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. Please replace this notice with {{no admin backlog}} when the backlog is cleared. |
Current requests for increase in protection level
[edit]Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Reason: Former pastor who confessed to sexual abuse. The man himself may not deserve protection, but his page does, as it has recently suffered a fair bit of the sort of emotionally charged edit-warring that would be expected in this situation. — HelpMyUnbelief (talk) 20:44, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 05:01, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 05:05, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Excellent! We agree!
Daniel Case (talk) 05:06, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Excellent! We agree!
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Aintabli (talk) 23:13, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent disruptive editing 2603:8080:D03:89D4:F14D:7CAF:17B3:D513 (talk) 23:41, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- List of programs broadcast by Boomerang (Latin American channel) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 00:35, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent disruptive editing, primarily by socks. Johnj1995 (talk) 00:44, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent disruptive editing, primarily by socks. Johnj1995 (talk) 00:45, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent unreferenced edits from IP users. Hotwiki (talk) 02:49, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – "Harassment" vandal current target. McSly (talk) 02:56, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- That's a big kids board. They can handle it. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 02:57, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – WP:RBI. Favonian (talk) 08:10, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:PIA. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 03:25, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:PIA. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 03:28, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Sinclairian (talk) 05:03, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing. Noorullah (talk) 05:17, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:26, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- User:Noorullah21 removes sourced material without a specific reason and does not discuss on the talk page. I reminded them several times about the reason for their removals, that please discuss on the talk page, but they don't act and complain disruptive editing instead.--Nooritahir734 (talk) 05:35, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
Already protected., since 2020. The matter is now at ANI. Favonian (talk) 08:00, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Keeps being vandalized by new/IP editors. I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 06:15, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term disruptions. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:31, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Should fall under WP:GENSEX. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 07:54, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by different IP addresses. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 08:02, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Temporary semi-protection: IP account edit warring and re-adding questionable BLP content despite being advised to use the talk page to discuss. Given the the subject of the article is described as intersex, this might even fall under WP:CTOP and need 1RR at some point if the TSP doesn't work. In addition to the PP, the IP's diffs might need to be revdeleted per BLP. -- Marchjuly (talk) 10:17, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
[edit]Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.
Reason: Three years ago, this page was extended-confirmed protected due to an edit war. I talked to the protecting admin and stated that there is zero chance for him to unprotect the article. Would consider downgrading the protection to semi. ScarletViolet tc 11:46, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: For some clarification, since I found this to be a little confusing, here's the link to their discussion. Zinnober9 (talk) 18:31, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
[edit]Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}},{{Edit template-protected}},{{Edit extended-protected}}, or{{Edit semi-protected}}to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
I would like to request that... Updating the image and description below because Th3 3ra is now complete. Time for changes. Bnika33 (talk) 18:58, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
Not done – No target specified and generally meaningless. Favonian (talk) 08:06, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
Handled requests
[edit]
| 3 protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 02:55, 5 October 2024 (UTC) |
| 8 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 09:46, 5 October 2024 (UTC) |
RFA= Requests for adminship
RFP= Requests for permissions
Autopatrolled
[edit]- GnocchiFan (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
GnocchiFan has made 5,000+ edits this year alone including 
seven Good Articles. They make extensive use of WMF Library to improve sourcing and prose. I believe they are both an excellent editor and also communicator, evident at sensitive article topics at 1984 anti-Sikh riots and Gender and sexual minorities in the Ottoman Empire. In short, let's reduce NPP backlog by giving them auto-patrolled status. ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 12:11, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Also worth mentioning GnocchiFan created 84 non redirect articles. One article was deleted Sophie Ottaway 8-months ago. ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 12:25, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
X's Tools is only finding 4 GAs. But regardless, done...--v/r - TP 19:24, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- @TParis: I was just taking a look at this when you accepted the request, but I have my concerns here. The single source tags on Martha Bohachevsky-Chomiak and Elizabeth Neesom are valid, and Elisabeth Nilsson (lawyer) doesn't demonstrate the subject's notability very well. They have some very good-looking articles, but I feel that the basis of quality for their creations needs to be a bit higher before they're ready for the autopatrolled flag. Courtesy ping for GnocchiFan; I hope this feedback is useful for your writing in the future. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 19:36, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- I agree – those are valid concerns. I've removed the flag. Schwede66 20:20, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- I don't really hold the same reservations that you do. There is a systematic bias against covering women in history and it's even greater outside of western media. There has been an effort to increase coverage of women and I feel these two articles are geared towards that goal. It's easy to write an internet article about a living person that recently does a thing and get it published. It only costs bits and bytes. But sources existing in the early 20th century or earlier, about women, when publishing was costlier rings stronger with regards to GNG than a single article on the internet. Overall, I'm confident this user will create encyclopedic content without significant errors. None of us are error free.--v/r - TP 20:27, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- @TParis: I was just taking a look at this when you accepted the request, but I have my concerns here. The single source tags on Martha Bohachevsky-Chomiak and Elizabeth Neesom are valid, and Elisabeth Nilsson (lawyer) doesn't demonstrate the subject's notability very well. They have some very good-looking articles, but I feel that the basis of quality for their creations needs to be a bit higher before they're ready for the autopatrolled flag. Courtesy ping for GnocchiFan; I hope this feedback is useful for your writing in the future. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 19:36, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
Automated comment This user has had this permission revoked in the past 180 days ([8]). — MusikBot talk 20:20, 3 October 2024 (UTC)- No opinion on the underlying disagreements, but since the right remains revoked, marking as
Not done for the bot. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 08:46, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Benmite (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Seems to be an experienced content creator whose creations are no longer in need of input from NPP. They don't have a clean record of their articles being kept at AfD, but the last deletion was a year and half and 60 articles ago, and looking through a random sampling of their work since then doesn't reveal any major issues. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 04:50, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Greeneyed soul (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Meets minimum criteria, only one article out of many created has been deleted (in 2015). Mach61 23:06, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Done--v/r - TP 19:21, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
Already done (automated response) by TParis. — MusikBot talk 20:30, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Nayyn (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Created 55 articles, none of which were deleted, including BLPs. I believe granting the AP flag to this editor will benefit NPP reviewers by reducing the backlog. GrabUp - Talk 16:00, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Done--v/r - TP 19:22, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Already done (automated response) by TParis. — MusikBot talk 20:30, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Tom.Reding (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Per my previous request December 2023 and 1) User talk:Tom.Reding#Auto patrol?, 2) User talk:Tom.Reding#Redirect reviews, 3) User talk:Primefac#Redirect reviews. ~ Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf) 16:57, 2 October 2024 (UTC) ~ Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf) 16:57, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Your recent creations of lists of minor planets is automated, right? Is there a bot request or other prior consensus somewhere for it somewhere? – Joe (talk) 11:57, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Tom.Reding: – Joe (talk) 11:57, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks.
Done on the understanding that the planet lists are uncontroversial. – Joe (talk) 12:16, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Iwaqarhashmi (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I saw my username on the Wikipedia database reports and found out I was eligible for the autopatrolled privilege. I've made lots of articles about Indian politicians recently and will continue to do so in the future. I'm a trusted user with lots of rights including NPP and fully familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. I also have the redirect autopatrol pseudoright, and I'd like to request the autopatrolled right in order to reduce the reviewing workload of new page patrollers. Thank you, Waqar💬 20:02, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Done asilvering (talk) 19:00, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Demt1298 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I have almost 25,000 edits, of which 98.9% are still live and have created 49 articles of which only one has been deleted, and that was a naming error on my part. I am a member of New Page Patrol as of September 2024. I am familiar with Wikipedia guidelines for both creation and deletion of articles. I would like to request autopatrol rights. Demt1298 (talk) 15:13, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- TheBirdsShedTears (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I am requesting autopatrol rights as I have been an active contributor since my account was unblocked. During this time, I have created multiple articles that adhere to Wikipedia's content policies and guidelines. My contributions focus on history and education, and I take care to ensure thorough referencing and proper formatting in every article.
I believe autopatrol rights would help reduce the workload for patrollers, as my work consistently meets Wikipedia's standards. I would appreciate your consideration of this request. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 17:00, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- I'm sorry but the UPE concerns raised last year will disqualify you from this permission for the foreseeable future. Not done. – Joe (talk) 12:20, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Joe Roe: My account was compromised. I didn't violate any policy of the Wikipedia since registered on this website. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 12:28, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Okay, but a) I have no way to confirm this (maybe @Xaosflux: can help with this?) and b) this is a sensitive right when it comes to UPE, I'm not sure we should be taking the risk of it happening again. – Joe (talk) 12:41, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- While not definitive, a potential account compromise does seem to have occurred between August and September of 2023. As it has been a year since then, if no new concerns have been raised since then I suggest this request be evaluated based on the article creations since then. — xaosflux Talk 15:08, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Okay, but a) I have no way to confirm this (maybe @Xaosflux: can help with this?) and b) this is a sensitive right when it comes to UPE, I'm not sure we should be taking the risk of it happening again. – Joe (talk) 12:41, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Joe Roe: My account was compromised. I didn't violate any policy of the Wikipedia since registered on this website. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 12:28, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
Confirmed
[edit]- Mlsfcx (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
The reason i wanted to ask to be confimed is that i was on the MF DOOM page and noticed that his name wasnt capitlized, he has stated many times in songs and other media that his name is spelled with "all caps", eventhis spotify page is capitlized so i was planning on correcting it but needed to either be autoconfimed or confirmed and i am sending this request for that reason. Mlsfcx (talk) 11:58, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Not done – Hi, and thank you for creating an account to edit Wikipedia. Although I fully understand your desire to dive right in, many of our articles are semi-protected because they are controversial, prone to vandalism, or other reasons. As a new editor with few edits, it might be wise to discuss your edits on the article talkpage in order to gain consensus for your edits, and then use {{Edit semi-protected}} to request the edit be performed. I only recommend this until you are used to the challenges of reliable sources, the biographies of living persons policy, and other similar policies. The good news is that fewer than 5 percent of Wikipedia articles are protected; this means that more than 95 percent of the articles can use your help right now! stwalkerster (talk) 12:47, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Page mover
[edit]
- Skitash (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I often move poorly-titled pages to more appropriate titles, usually to make them more WP:CONCISE, specific, neutral, or to correct spelling and transliterations. I also revert undiscussed moves in line with WP:RMUM. I would greatly appreciate having the ability to manage this myself. Skitash (talk) 21:43, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Nuvolet (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I'd like to get this right to delete unnecessary redirects (i.e. move pages over existing single revision redirects regardless of target). Additionally, I would also like to try to harmonize some pages of Spanish municipalities with the name of the country and the province (when necessary) instead of other subnational units (such as comarca). Moreover if a double denomination exists in some cases, I shall use the slash with spaces in between to enhance visual effect of different linguistic nomenclatures. However if an English form is more relevant I shall use it instead of double and local denominations. Other than that I could help elsewhere to move pages if necessary. Thank you, Nuvolet (talk)
Pending changes reviewer
[edit]- Aliy Dawut (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hello hello, I have been a Wikipedian for well over 4 months now, and I feel that I have learned a great many things about the site in terms of editing, content, policies, and conduct that I could have never imagined beforehand. If given this right, I humbly commit to using it to the utmost competent and fair / legitimate nature that I possibly can. Thank you Aliy Dawut (talk) 02:52, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- HypeBoy (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I have been contributing to pages for three years now, with prior experience in patrolling edit filter log. I would like to get reviewer rights so I can contribute to Wikipedia in more ways than I am able to, presently, and help with the backlog. Since my last request in July, I've been making a track record of communicating collegially with other editors, in my talk page and elsewhere. I hope you'll consider me. Thank you. — hhypeboyh 💬 • ✏️ 23:11, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment This user has had 1 request for pending changes reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([9]). — MusikBot talk 23:20, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- DM5Pedia (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I've been doing RC Patrolling (as a part of Anti-Vandalism) on Wikipedia for a while now, and I think that having the Pending Changes reviewer permission could be a good idea - there have been numerous instances involving a pending changes edit that I look at while looking through Special:RecentChanges that i wanted to accept/deny/etc, and i feel that this permission would be beneficial for my efficeincy. DM5Pedia 04:34, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Legendbird (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hi! I believe that I'd be a good Pending Changes Reviewer, as I have a good amount of time on my hands, and can do monotonous tasks, like denying obvious vandalism, and the like. I meet, what I believe are all the requirements for this right, and humbly ask to receive this privilege. Thanks in advance! Legendbird (talk) 09:06, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Cactinites (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Reason for requesting pending changes reviewer rights: I am an Wikipedian for more than three years and part of various wikiprojects I need permission to expand my works on Wikipedia and also to observe Wikipedia articles. Cactinites (talk) 15:28, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Neveselbert (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I've been editing since 2015 and primarily work on articles related to politics and history. I have experience with reverting vandalism, verifying content complies with policies like V, NPOV and BLP, and I think I can help maintain the quality of articles like those in my watchlist by reviewing pending changes, which I've successfully requested for pages at RPP multiple times in the past, including in August 2021, May 2023, this January and this August. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 22:07, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Thx56 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hi! I've been using Wikipedia on-and-off since 2020, but I'm starting to become more active. I'd like to become a pending change reviewer, as I've often wanted to help out but have struggled finding where I can actually contribute, and I think this is a good place to contribute. I'm familiar with the guidelines, as well. Thx56 (talk) 21:28, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Rollback
[edit]- Charliehdb (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I have been working to revert vandalism for some time now, mostly patrolling Recent changes. I have used Twinkle and RedWarn to revert vandalism and warn vandals. Rollback rights would make it easier for me to revert obvious vandalism. Thanks. Charliehdb (talk) 10:57, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- I see that you are failing to consistently warn editors when you revert their edits (e.g. 1, 2, 3). Why? It's important to leave a notification for every revert you make. Are you aware that we have tools such as Twinkle or Ultraviolet that make this extremely easy? -Fastily 08:27, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Fastily: Thanks for pointing it out. I assure you that I will warn all vandals from now on. I hope you give me Rollback rights. Thanks. Charliehdb (talk) 12:40, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Please ensure that you are always leaving warnings. I can't stress enough the importance of not biting the newcomers; if you find yourself reverting good faith edits, then it's especially important to notify the editor. If you don't want to leave a template warning, that's completely fine, but you do need to leave a talk page message explaining why you reverted the edit. Moving forward, could you please make a promise to leave warnings/notifications for every revert? -Fastily 01:08, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Fastily: Offcourse, I will leave warnings/notifications for every revert. Charliehdb (talk) 13:39, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Great, thanks for confirming. I'm also a bit concerned by your recent block for edit warring. How have you learned from this experience, and in your own words, can you explain why your actions leading up to the block were inappropriate? Also, courtesy ping for @Bbb23 -Fastily 20:29, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- I don't think Charlie is ready for rollback. Besides responding to your request for an explanation, I think they should wait until they have a better track record, including not edit-warring and giving people warnings.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:55, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Fastily: I was blocked on 5 July 2024, due to edit warring. But after that, I have learned more about wikipedia policies. As you can see, in my recent contributions I haven't been in any edit warring and was notifying the users about the reverts. Thanks. Charliehdb (talk) 03:09, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- Great, thanks for confirming. I'm also a bit concerned by your recent block for edit warring. How have you learned from this experience, and in your own words, can you explain why your actions leading up to the block were inappropriate? Also, courtesy ping for @Bbb23 -Fastily 20:29, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Fastily: Offcourse, I will leave warnings/notifications for every revert. Charliehdb (talk) 13:39, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Please ensure that you are always leaving warnings. I can't stress enough the importance of not biting the newcomers; if you find yourself reverting good faith edits, then it's especially important to notify the editor. If you don't want to leave a template warning, that's completely fine, but you do need to leave a talk page message explaining why you reverted the edit. Moving forward, could you please make a promise to leave warnings/notifications for every revert? -Fastily 01:08, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Fastily: Thanks for pointing it out. I assure you that I will warn all vandals from now on. I hope you give me Rollback rights. Thanks. Charliehdb (talk) 12:40, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Template editor
[edit]- P199 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I already work on templates from time to time, to improve formatting, fix links, add features, etc. My record speaks for itself that I am careful in making changes. Thanks. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:27, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Standard Guidelines review:
(guideline: >1 year, applicant: 18)- (guideline: >1000 edits, applicant: ~55k)
- (guideline: >150 template edits, applicant: ~1000)
- (guideline: !<6 months, applicant: 8 years)
(guideline: 3 sandboxes, applicant: ~1 (other sandboxes were edited before protection enabled)- (guideline: 5 requests, applicant: 0)
- Primefac (talk) 14:57, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Standard Guidelines review:
![[7]](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Google_Chat_Home_Android.png){kind=link}
Footer
[edit]Policies and links
DYK
[edit]| Count of DYK Hooks | ||
| Section | # of Hooks | # Verified |
|---|---|---|
| August 4 | 1 | |
| August 5 | 1 | |
| August 7 | 1 | |
| August 8 | 1 | |
| August 11 | 1 | |
| August 14 | 1 | |
| August 20 | 2 | 1 |
| August 23 | 1 | |
| August 24 | 3 | 3 |
| August 25 | 5 | 4 |
| August 26 | 3 | 1 |
| August 27 | 5 | 4 |
| August 28 | 4 | 2 |
| August 29 | 5 | 3 |
| August 30 | 11 | 2 |
| August 31 | 5 | 3 |
| September 1 | 3 | 3 |
| September 2 | 5 | 2 |
| September 3 | 4 | 3 |
| September 4 | 2 | 1 |
| September 5 | 2 | |
| September 6 | 4 | 1 |
| September 7 | 7 | 1 |
| September 8 | 5 | 2 |
| September 9 | 7 | 3 |
| September 10 | 6 | 5 |
| September 11 | 4 | 2 |
| September 12 | 7 | 2 |
| September 13 | 3 | 1 |
| September 14 | 3 | 3 |
| September 15 | 9 | 4 |
| September 16 | 7 | 2 |
| September 17 | 3 | 1 |
| September 18 | 10 | 7 |
| September 19 | 7 | 3 |
| September 20 | 9 | 1 |
| September 21 | 4 | 1 |
| September 22 | 6 | 2 |
| September 23 | 7 | |
| September 24 | 7 | 3 |
| September 25 | 6 | 2 |
| September 26 | 7 | 3 |
| September 27 | 9 | 3 |
| September 28 | 8 | 5 |
| September 29 | 7 | 6 |
| September 30 | 6 | 6 |
| October 1 | 6 | 5 |
| October 2 | 1 | |
| October 3 | 9 | 1 |
| October 4 | 7 | 3 |
| October 5 | 1 | |
| Total | 248 | 110 |
| Last updated 08:50, 5 October 2024 UTC Current time is 10:29, 5 October 2024 UTC [refresh] | ||