Jump to content

User:Gazimoff/Bookmarks

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Main
Main
   
Talk to me
Talk to me
   
Mentoring
Mentoring
   
About me
About me
   
Awards
Awards
   
Articles I've worked on
Articles I've worked on
   
Bookmarks & Sandboxes
Bookmarks & Sandboxes
   
Archive
Archive
   
Gallery
Gallery
   
Email me
Email me
 
                                     


Workstack, bookmarks, sandboxes and admin panels.


Current workstack

Priority Task name Location Comments Progress
1 RfA Review WP:RREV Complete Reflect section of review 50%.
2 Admin Coaching/Editor coaching proposal User:Gazimoff/Coaching proposal Complete initial draft Approx 50% complete, needs further detail.
3 Get World of Warcraft to GA World of Warcraft Incorporate changes from peer review, slim down further 70%
4 Get World of Warcraft: The Burning Crusade to GA World of Warcraft: The Burning Crusade Currently working on reception section 20% complete
5 Complete essay on Clue theory User:Gazimoff/Clue theory Build premise, see if it's feasible 10%
6 Add mroe parameters and options to welcome username warn template Template:Welcome-name Scope/design 10%

Sandboxes

  • No current sandboxes

Videogame bookmarks

Admin bookmarks

  • 1

Admin dashboard

Admin dashboard


CAVEAT: all the |show= parameters have been set to 7 days.


Immediate requests Entries
Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages 0
Wikipedians looking for help 1
Requests for unblock 118
Wikipedia semi-protected edit requests 33
Wikipedia template-protected edit requests 10
Wikipedia fully protected edit requests 1
Wikipedia conflict of interest edit requests 96
Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations 1
Candidates for speedy deletion 26
Open sockpuppet investigations 373
Click here to locate other admin backlogs

AB = Administrative Backlogs

[edit]

Administrative backlog

[edit]

AIV= Administrator intervention against vandalism

Administrator intervention against vandalism

Reports

[edit]

User-reported

[edit]


CSD= Candidates for speedy deletion ; PROD= Proposed deletions

Candidates for speedy deletion Entries
User requested 3
Empty articles 1
Nonsense pages 0
Spam pages 1
Importance or significance not asserted 1
Other candidates 21

The following articles have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days:
( source / chronological order / expired )

UAA= Usernames for administrator attention ; RFPP= Requests for page protection

Usernames for administrator attention

User-reported

[edit]
Requests for page protection


Current requests for increase in protection level

[edit]
Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.


Reason: Edit warring. HorrorLover555 (talk) 03:19, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Checking to see if protection is necessary. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 07:58, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 08:05, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 08:05, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Reason: High level of bad editing without sources, wrong grammar due to him being in the news recently (elected as Deputy Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu Skratata69 (talk) 04:26, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protected due to BLP violations. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 08:20, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A request was made yesterday, but presumably was denied. Disruptive editing from IP and new users continue to be a problem. CurryTime7-24 (talk) 06:02, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 06:11, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 08:12, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 08:16, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:PIA. Bunnypranav (talk) 06:45, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 08:21, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Creation protection: Repeatedly recreated. M S Hassan 📬✍🏻 07:09, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Frost 08:21, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Current requests for reduction in protection level

[edit]
Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level

Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

  • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
  • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
  • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
  • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Reason: Not so long article, some content was removed. Warthunder20 (talk) 01:08, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. The content was removed for valid reasons, as you can see in the article's edit history. ~Anachronist (talk) 01:23, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
The user has also been blocked indef. Daniel Case (talk) 03:18, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Current requests for edits to a protected page

[edit]
Request a specific edit to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here

Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

  • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
  • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
  • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
  • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
  • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.


Handled requests

[edit]
A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
Protected edit requests

1 protected edit request
v·h
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
Template:In string (request) 2024-09-03 23:19 Cascade-protected from Wikipedia:Cascade-protected items/Main Page/5 (log) Protected by Mifter on 2017-03-25: "Considering the main page was unprotected by a compromised sysop semi recently, perhaps transcluding it to a cascade protected page will provide a small increase in protection"
Updated as needed. Last updated: 18:55, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
10 template-protected edit requests
v·h
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
Template:Infobox comedian (request) 2024-08-20 02:45 Template-protected (log) Modified by Mark Arsten on 2013-10-18: "Allowing Protected Template editors"
Module:Political party (request) 2024-09-13 06:12 Template-protected (log) Protected by MusikBot II on 2021-11-18: "High-risk template or module: 13487 transclusions (more info)"
Module:MultiReplace (request) 2024-09-17 16:38 Template-protected (log) Modified by MusikAnimal on 2019-02-25: "High-risk Lua module"
Template:Rail-interchange (request) 2024-09-19 22:31 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 4000+ transclusions"
Template:Country data Guadeloupe (request) 2024-09-20 19:42 Template-protected (log) Modified by Courcelles on 2013-10-17: "Not quite high-risk enough now that we have a trusted template editor right."
Template:League icon (request) 2024-09-24 11:33 Template-protected (log) Modified by WOSlinker on 2013-10-20: "allow template editors to modify"
Template:Infobox song contest national year (request) 2024-09-24 18:17 Template-protected (log) Modified by CT Cooper on 2015-03-01: "Merging has increased use, so upping protection to template editors only."
Module:College color/data (request) 2024-09-25 22:23 Template-protected (log) Modified by Galobtter on 2019-01-24: "High-risk Lua module"
Template:WikiProject Conservatism (request) 2024-09-28 20:10 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 4000+ transclusions"
Template:Infobox language (request) 2024-09-29 17:36 Template-protected (log) Modified by MusikAnimal on 2021-08-16: "Highly visible template: transclusion count now over 9,000; most recent editors are still able to edit"
Updated as needed. Last updated: 02:27, 30 September 2024 (UTC)


RFA= Requests for adminship

RfA candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report
RfB candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report

No RfXs since 08:57, 27 September 2024 (UTC).—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online

RFP= Requests for permissions

Autopatrolled

[edit]

GnocchiFan has made 5,000+ edits this year alone including seven Good Articles. They make extensive use of WMF Library to improve sourcing and prose. I believe they are both an excellent editor and also communicator, evident at sensitive article topics at 1984 anti-Sikh riots and Gender and sexual minorities in the Ottoman Empire. In short, let's reduce NPP backlog by giving them auto-patrolled status. ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 12:11, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

Also worth mentioning GnocchiFan created 84 non redirect articles. One article was deleted Sophie Ottaway 8-months ago. ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 12:25, 21 September 2024 (UTC)

Seems to be an experienced content creator whose creations are no longer in need of input from NPP. They don't have a clean record of their articles being kept at AfD, but the last deletion was a year and half and 60 articles ago, and looking through a random sampling of their work since then doesn't reveal any major issues. TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 04:50, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

Meets minimum criteria, only one article out of many created has been deleted (in 2015). Mach61 23:06, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

There are no outstanding requests for the confirmed flag.


Confirmed

[edit]

File mover

[edit]

I am requesting file mover rights because I have experience in handling and maintaining various file types and I believe my contributions to several files and my various file rename requests as seen in the editing history here showcase my understanding of the naming policy for files. File names are often a decent part of my contributions with film and television-related articles, and carrying out these renames to satisfy naming conventions rather than having to request them every time a file needs to be renamed would prove beneficial in their up-keeping. Trailblazer101 (talk) 01:41, 24 September 2024 (UTC)

There are no outstanding requests for the page mover flag.

Page mover

[edit]



Pending changes reviewer

[edit]

I have reviewed the criteria for receiving this permission, and feel my contribution history demonstrates an adequate knowledge of creating, expanding, and patrolling articles in accordance to Wikipedia policies. Tvfunhouse (talk) 00:54, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

Hello hello, I have been a Wikipedian for well over 4 months now, and I feel that I have learned a great many things about the site in terms of editing, content, policies, and conduct that I could have never imagined beforehand. If given this right, I humbly commit to using it to the utmost competent and fair / legitimate nature that I possibly can. Thank you Aliy Dawut (talk) 02:52, 13 September 2024 (UTC)

I have been contributing to pages for three years now, with prior experience in patrolling edit filter log. I would like to get reviewer rights so I can contribute to Wikipedia in more ways than I am able to, presently, and help with the backlog. Since my last request in July, I've been making a track record of communicating collegially with other editors, in my talk page and elsewhere. I hope you'll consider me. Thank you. — ‎‎‎hhypeboyh 💬✏️ 23:11, 13 September 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for pending changes reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([1]). MusikBot talk 23:20, 13 September 2024 (UTC)

I've been doing RC Patrolling (as a part of Anti-Vandalism) on Wikipedia for a while now, and I think that having the Pending Changes reviewer permission could be a good idea - there have been numerous instances involving a pending changes edit that I look at while looking through Special:RecentChanges that i wanted to accept/deny/etc, and i feel that this permission would be beneficial for my efficeincy. DM5Pedia 04:34, 22 September 2024 (UTC)

Hi! I believe that I'd be a good Pending Changes Reviewer, as I have a good amount of time on my hands, and can do monotonous tasks, like denying obvious vandalism, and the like. I meet, what I believe are all the requirements for this right, and humbly ask to receive this privilege. Thanks in advance! Legendbird (talk) 09:06, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

Reason for requesting pending changes reviewer rights: I am an Wikipedian for more than three years and part of various wikiprojects I need permission to expand my works on Wikipedia and also to observe Wikipedia articles. Cactinites (talk) 15:28, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

I have been reviewing semi-protected, extended-protected, and COI edit requests for about a month, and having the right to review pending changes would allow me to extend my reach in this topic. I have also been countering vandalism for 5 months, and I have the rollback right. — BerryForPerpetuity (talk) 07:50, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

I have been patrolling recent changes since 8 August 2024 and reverting edits there too. I would like to get the Pending Changes reviewers rights because I sometimes come across constructive edits and would like to accept them (if constructive). So it'll be good if I got those rights. I think I'll also be a good Pending changes reviewer too. PEPSI697 (💬📝) 05:59, 30 September 2024 (UTC)


Rollback

[edit]

I have been working to revert vandalism for some time now, mostly patrolling Recent changes. I have used Twinkle and RedWarn to revert vandalism and warn vandals. Rollback rights would make it easier for me to revert obvious vandalism. Thanks. Charliehdb (talk) 10:57, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

I have been reverting edits and warning users by patrolling recent changes for almost two months now. I have been using Twinkle to revert edits but manually warned users. I have consistently warned users most of the time after reverting their edits. I have been patrolling recent changes since 8 August 2024. I think getting Rollback rights would make it easier to revert edits or vandalism. Thank you. PEPSI697 (💬📝) 05:49, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Template editor

[edit]

I already work on templates from time to time, to improve formatting, fix links, add features, etc. My record speaks for itself that I am careful in making changes. Thanks. P 1 9 9   13:27, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

Standard Guidelines review:
  1. Green tickY (guideline: >1 year, applicant: 18)
  2. Green tickY (guideline: >1000 edits, applicant: ~55k)
  3. Green tickY (guideline: >150 template edits, applicant: ~1000)
  4. Green tickY (guideline: !<6 months, applicant: 8 years)
  5. Red XN (guideline: 3 sandboxes, applicant: ~1 (other sandboxes were edited before protection enabled)
  6. Red XN (guideline: 5 requests, applicant: 0)
Primefac (talk) 14:57, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
@Primefac: My "need for the right, as well as a familiarity with the care and responsibility required" is proven by my overall record and experience with WP, not necessarily meeting an arbitrary guideline limit. Thanks. -- P 1 9 9   15:23, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
I made no claims about your need, or lack thereof. I was simply filling out the standard guideline review. Primefac (talk) 15:36, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

Footer

[edit]

Policies and links

    Policies, processes etc

    Miscellaneous