Template:Admin dashboard
Administrative backlog
Reports
- Deacon Bobby (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) - CeCe Winans was changed by Deacon Bobby (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.861979 on 2024-10-09T13:25:01+00:00 (Automated) ClueBot NG (talk) 13:25, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- User has been incorrectly or insufficiently warned. Re-report if the user resumes vandalising after being warned sufficiently. DatGuyTalkContribs 13:38, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Jamshed Ali Hasrat Rind (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 926 (Image vandalism II, details). Note: Please carefully consider context before blocking. Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 14:34, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Warned by Drm310. PhilKnight (talk) 17:41, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Amelia McNeese (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 926 (Image vandalism II, details). Note: Please carefully consider context before blocking. Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 14:42, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Edits are not vandalism. Please ensure recent edits constitute vandalism before re-reporting. Joyous! Noise! 15:22, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Naalek (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1319 (LTA 1319, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 16:28, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- False positive. Edits are not vandalism. Not MidAtlanticBaby. PhilKnight (talk) 17:28, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- 154.205.157.42 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 61 five times in the last 5 minutes (New user removing references, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 17:58, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- 80.0.246.251 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 231 five times in the last 5 minutes (Long string of characters containing no spaces, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 18:15, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
User-reported
- 222.154.16.98 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Every single edit from this ip address is disruptive vandalism of templates for a reality television competition—changing progress tables to not align with cited source of each episode, adding erroneous information. every single edit reverted due to incorrect information Griffindaly (talk) 17:38, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Warned user. ⇌ Jake Wartenberg 17:40, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Iddoignaciozuñigarojas2009 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Vandalism only account. Obvious sock; see SPI case for previous accounts. -- Cyberlink420 (talk) 17:47, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- On Category:Cancelled browser games (diff): vandalism after final warning; actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account; account is evidently a spambot or a compromised account. IMMEDIATE BLOCK NEEDED. *:User keeps vandalising pages, edit warring, clear sockpuppet. Thanks, Cooldudeseven7 (Cheers! Let's Discuss over a cup of tea!) Celebrating 1000 Edits! 18:08, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- User is not at all stopping! Extreme repeated vandalism Thanks, Cooldudeseven7 (Cheers! Let's Discuss over a cup of tea!) Celebrating 1000 Edits! 18:08, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- User has 74 edits, and they are ALL vandalism. ItTollsForThee (talk) 18:19, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Americanninjawarriorfan218 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Bagpipemcghee (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Ihatemayo1313 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- TheSchoolBoy12332 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Whycantiuserandomcharacters1234444 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Rashedschool69 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- University accreditatiin (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- JenniferemmysharpFaithzehfuss (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Setsetsetsetbsevwahrse (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- TheTabernacleLiarAtTempleSquare (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Trusername (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
User-reported
- Jimmymooneyofficial (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Theroadislong (talk) 07:17, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Not a violation of the username policy. Real names are permitted except when they imply that the editor is a specific living person they are not. Consider filing a report at the conflict of interest noticeboard. This doesn't appear to be a case where the person is trying to impersonate someone. Their sole edit so far asks the question about how they can get an article about themselves on the project. It's worth monitoring for COI reasons, but nothing immediate to block for. --Hammersoft (talk) 17:26, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. Please replace this notice with {{no admin backlog}} when the backlog is cleared. |
Current requests for increase in protection level
Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-time history of vandalism by IP addresses. dotXK 03:00, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Due to some of the buzz around the movie, the page is being persistently vandalized. Professor Penguino (talk) 07:02, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit warring by two editors to reinstate POV tags to the article despite a lack of consensus for the additional of those tags. TarnishedPathtalk 09:28, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – One month semi to prevent ongoing disruption by IPs/new accounts trying to push a racial POV on this BLP. Valereee (talk) 12:01, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 13:47, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Filmssssssssssss, it's got pending, which seems like it's working? Valereee (talk) 15:50, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Ok Filmssssssssssss (talk) 16:14, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Withdrawn by requestor Favonian (talk) 17:30, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent disruption. ZimZalaBim talk 14:16, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent disruption. ZimZalaBim talk 14:18, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Disruptive removal of band member from Personnel section. Also requesting page protection for the following articles for the same reason: Act I: Live in Rosario, Colours in the Dark (album) and The Shadow Self. HorrorLover555 (talk) 15:04, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:08, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Page protection appears to have expired, and IP editors are once again seeking to remove a redirect established a few months ago by AfD consensus per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zee Marathi Utsav Natyancha Awards 2023. Please re-apply protection, thanks! Dclemens1971 (talk) 15:21, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Due to conflicting views in the community, many people vandalise this article to suit their own individual conveniences rather than the beliefs held within the majority of the Sikh community (for example, depicted mona sikhs rather than sahajdhari ones) 2A00:23C8:4B00:D301:A9DC:4B8F:F3DF:8CB7 (talk) 15:50, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Strange users keep reversing any edits about the ancentry of the admiral. His Serbian ancestry is absolute non-sense and is not confirmed by any source. Karadzic46 (talk) 15:55, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. BattleshipMan (talk) 16:12, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
Reason: The article is within scope of WP:ARBECR, which states "this restriction is preferably enforced through extended confirmed protection". Sean.hoyland (talk) 16:35, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
Reason: The article is within scope of WP:ARBECR, which states "this restriction is preferably enforced through extended confirmed protection". Sean.hoyland (talk) 16:36, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
Reason: lots of ip vandalism with making it "were" vs "are an inactive" 45BearsFan (talk) 16:41, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @45BearsFan: Please read vandalism because it's not vandalism. While we will protect articles having issues with unsourced or poorly-sourced edits, it would help if the edit summaries in the article were clearer about the reasons for reversions, restorations of content, etc. That's to help both newcomers and anyone reviewing the history. A summary like
bringing this back
is not ideal. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 17:25, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite full protection: Users repeatedly recreating article despite AFD consensus to redirect. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:55, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
Reason: The page called Tharavad has this guy keep deleting cited sources for no reason. Requesting Extended Protection for the page. Tnx. DravidianSingam (talk) 16:55, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Chronic disruption of nationality of company, specifically it being changed to being Chinese by IP editors. Has been previously protected and has resumed since expiration. TylerBurden (talk) 17:02, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Edit war between IP user and registered user, IP user unwilling to talk it to talk page. ~Darth StabroTalk/Contribs 17:28, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ip vandalism. Mostly removal but a few BLP issues. Knitsey (talk) 17:56, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.
Reason: An event that has already passed, and mostly final infomation. Wikihelper910 (talk) 17:59, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Wikihelper910: This was protected under the auspices of a contentious topic designation (post-1992 politics of the United States) and cannot be unilaterally unprotected. Appeal at WP:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement or at WP:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 01:13, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Reason: It`s been edited by someone who shouldnt have the authority to edit what was effectively an acurate page. Your "editor" has already been cited many times as being extremely biased against certain protected categories and allows his fetishes to dictate what and how he edits! 124.244.164.104 (talk) 08:02, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. – Muboshgu (talk) 14:36, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
Reason: The article is a complete fabrication of the proven truth. 109.146.139.172 (talk) 10:13, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. – Muboshgu (talk) 14:36, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
Reason: The page contains false and misleading information. 90.180.72.152 (talk) 13:43, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. – Muboshgu (talk) 14:36, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Any further requests for this from another user who is here because of the GBNews piece and does not provide a defensible "change X to Y" style of request will be reverted off as disruptive.
- @Muboshgu: The talk page is currently semi-protected due to a glut of drive-by users coming in thanks to a GBNews piece about the topic. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 15:28, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}}
,{{Edit template-protected}}
,{{Edit extended-protected}}
, or{{Edit semi-protected}}
to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}
template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Handled requests
A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
15 protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Updated as needed. Last updated: 17:07, 9 October 2024 (UTC) |
16 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Updated as needed. Last updated: 18:13, 9 October 2024 (UTC) |
WP:PERM
Requests for autopatrolled |
---|
Autopatrolled
GnocchiFan has made 5,000+ edits this year alone including seven Good Articles. They make extensive use of WMF Library to improve sourcing and prose. I believe they are both an excellent editor and also communicator, evident at sensitive article topics at 1984 anti-Sikh riots and Gender and sexual minorities in the Ottoman Empire. In short, let's reduce NPP backlog by giving them auto-patrolled status. ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 12:11, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
Meets the minimum criteria, and a random sampling of their creations doesn't raise any red flags. My only concern is their liberal use of quotations in reception sections, but I don't consider it an overly serious issue for this permission as the copyright reports come away otherwise clean; I've also started a discussion on their talk page about it. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 18:54, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
Dear Wikipedia Admins, I am requesting the Autopatrolled right to further support my contributions to Wikipedia. While I may not have thousands of edits or article creations, my work is rooted in careful research and learning from experienced editors. My focus is on Iranian early modern, modern, and contemporary art and culture, especially highlighting the stories of Iranian women often overlooked in history. I ensure all my edits are supported by reliable, academic sources, and I have a track record of accurate contributions with very few reverts. I believe that having the Autopatrolled right would allow me to continue enhancing the articles related to Iran and Iranian art and culture. Thank you for your consideration. Warm regards, Hounaam (talk) 22:53, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
I am requesting the Autopatrolled right, like any other editor, to help reduce the NPP work load. I have worked at AFC/NPP/AFD, and I've created good articles that would pass a deletion discussion if nominated. Cheers! Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 11:47, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
|
Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access |
---|
AutoWikiBrowser
I'm requesting access for updating articles and doing various small tweaks. Ty. — Sadko (words are wind) 00:10, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
i will use it to correct the citation before the punctuation, on many articles i known User.inu6 (talk) 12:56, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
Would find this very useful for tedious/repetitive edits. Thanks! Cocobb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 15:45, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
I've been asked to create talk pages (linking to wikiprojects) for category pages which I have created. This would be easy with AWB (there are a lot of them). Perspicax (talk) 13:37, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
I want to replace links to old photos with links to better photos Kent Wang (talk) 18:31, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
I'd like to keep using AutoWikiBrowser to better add WikiProjects to talk pages in other languages, such as those in the Vietnamese versions of Establishments in Italy by year, as well as fixing (not necessarily removing like before) unknown parameters in templates. OpalYosutebito (talk) 13:22, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
I would love to use this for category maintenance and WikiProject tagging across a wide spread of articles quickly. (Oinkers42) (talk) 22:21, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
AWB would be helpful for tasks like fixing simple citation template errors, which I've been doing off and on since I made an account. I'd also like to continue leaning into other WikiGnome things (typos, ...). FifthFive (talk) 04:17, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
|
There are no outstanding requests for the confirmed flag. |
---|
Confirmed |
Requests for extended confirmation |
---|
Extended confirmed
I have created this alternate account to separate my edits on different topics; mainly to maintain separate Watchlists, Notifications etc. I have already made over 10.7k+ edits on my other account. Vestrian24Bio 2 (TALK) 12:44, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
|
There are no outstanding requests for the event coordinator flag. |
---|
Event coordinator |
There are no outstanding requests for the file mover flag. |
---|
File mover |
Requests for new page reviewer |
---|
New page reviewer
I have been a registered user on Wikipedia for several years, with over 500 undeleted mainspace edits. I possess a strong understanding of content policies and guidelines, supported by my experience in quality control processes. I have actively participated in deletion processes like AfD, PROD, and CSD, contributed to Articles for Creation, and written new articles. I maintain a solid track record of interacting civilly and constructively with other editors, especially newcomers. I have no active behavioral blocks or 3RR violations within the last 6 months, and I am committed to reviewing pages solely on a volunteer basis. Imad_J (talk) 13:26, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I would like to request temporary NPR rights. After reviewing the criteria, I believe I meet the necessary requirements. Could you please confirm if I am eligible? Thank you! EEverest 8848 (talk) 04:34, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
Greetings! I am requesting an extension of my NPP trial or have it made permanent. I was previously given a one-month extension to demonstrate my AfD skills, and in the one-month trial prior to that, I demonstrated my Review and AfC skills. Unfortunately, I have been busy preparing for the Chinese Chemistry Olympiads Finals and have had little time to edit Wikipedia for the past month. Still, I have performed some AfD and have hopefully shown my knowledge in that area. The Finals will be over on November 1st, and I'd have plenty of time to do editing then, which is why I am making this request. Pygos (talk) 07:09, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
Hello. My 1 month NPP trial is set to expire in less than a week. I believe I have performed fairly well in working both redirects and articles. I've recently been working on initiating more AfDs. Requesting a review of my trial's expiration date for an extension or permanent status. Garsh (talk) 18:45, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
Reason for requesting new page reviewer rights 79lives (talk) 11:20, 6 October 2024 (UTC) I just want to help review articles; I have tried going into WP:AFD and that has actually been really fun developing my knowledge on notability. But, going back on to the topic of being a New Page Reviewer would mean dedicating my time to try helping to alleviate he backlog and being able to sort out new articles whether they are an orphan or even need more citations.
I try to become more active, and I'm familiar with the guidelines as well. I need permission to expand my contribution on Wikipedia. Vikingsam (talk) 21:28, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
To review new pages on for the wikipedia main space-- Declining articles that don't represent our goals on this project. Gonzafer001 (talk) 09:18, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
I am requesting trial for New Page Reviewer rights as I have made many significant edits to main pages on Wikipedia. I am familiar with Wikipedia’s guidelines and policies and have experience in assessing the quality of new articles. With my background in content creation and editing, I believe I can contribute effectively to the review process and help maintain the quality of newly created pages. A trial would allow me to demonstrate my ability to effectively contribute to the review process and ensure that new pages meet the required standards. Thankyou! 𝒮-𝒜𝓊𝓇𝒶 12:48, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
|
Requests for page mover |
---|
Page mover
I often move poorly-titled pages to more appropriate titles, usually to make them more WP:CONCISE, specific, neutral, or to correct spelling and transliterations. I also revert undiscussed moves in line with WP:RMUM. I would greatly appreciate having the ability to manage this myself. Skitash (talk) 21:43, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
I'd like to get this right to delete unnecessary redirects (i.e. move pages over existing single revision redirects regardless of target). Additionally, I would also like to try to harmonize some pages of Spanish municipalities with the name of the country and the province (when necessary) instead of other subnational units (such as comarca). Moreover if a double denomination exists in some cases, I shall use the slash with spaces in between to enhance visual effect of different linguistic nomenclatures. However if an English form is more relevant I shall use it instead of double and local denominations. Other than that I could help elsewhere to move pages if necessary. Thank you, Nuvolet (talk)
i have been on wikipedia for almost 10 years, I have familiarized myself with the projects mission. Gonzafer001 (talk) 09:19, 7 October 2024 (UTC) |
Requests for pending changes reviewer |
---|
Pending changes reviewer
Hello hello, I have been a Wikipedian for well over 4 months now, and I feel that I have learned a great many things about the site in terms of editing, content, policies, and conduct that I could have never imagined beforehand. If given this right, I humbly commit to using it to the utmost competent and fair / legitimate nature that I possibly can. Thank you Aliy Dawut (talk) 02:52, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
I have been contributing to pages for three years now, with prior experience in patrolling edit filter log. I would like to get reviewer rights so I can contribute to Wikipedia in more ways than I am able to, presently, and help with the backlog. Since my last request in July, I've been making a track record of communicating collegially with other editors, in my talk page and elsewhere. I hope you'll consider me. Thank you. — hhypeboyh 💬 • ✏️ 23:11, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
I've been doing RC Patrolling (as a part of Anti-Vandalism) on Wikipedia for a while now, and I think that having the Pending Changes reviewer permission could be a good idea - there have been numerous instances involving a pending changes edit that I look at while looking through Special:RecentChanges that i wanted to accept/deny/etc, and i feel that this permission would be beneficial for my efficeincy. DM5Pedia 04:34, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
Hi! I believe that I'd be a good Pending Changes Reviewer, as I have a good amount of time on my hands, and can do monotonous tasks, like denying obvious vandalism, and the like. I meet, what I believe are all the requirements for this right, and humbly ask to receive this privilege. Thanks in advance! Legendbird (talk) 09:06, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason for requesting pending changes reviewer rights: I am an Wikipedian for more than three years and part of various wikiprojects I need permission to expand my works on Wikipedia and also to observe Wikipedia articles. Cactinites (talk) 15:28, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
Hi! I've been using Wikipedia on-and-off since 2020, but I'm starting to become more active. I'd like to become a pending change reviewer, as I've often wanted to help out but have struggled finding where I can actually contribute, and I think this is a good place to contribute. I'm familiar with the guidelines, as well. Thx56 (talk) 21:28, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
To review pending changes on Wikipedia Gonzafer001 (talk) 09:16, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Reason for requesting pending changes reviewer rights: I have been a wikipedia editor for some time now and love to revert vandalism and unconstructive edits to prevent the spread of problems on wikipedia. I currently am a Recent Changes patrol and love my job! I have successfully achieved 1000 total edits (or ~ 325 mainspace edits) on the english wikipedia. I can't wait to be a pending changes reviewer, as it will allow me to stop the spread of vandalism even farther! Thanks, Cooldudeseven7 (Cheers! Let's Discuss over a cup of tea!) Celebrating 1000 Edits! 11:40, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
|
Requests for rollback |
---|
Rollback
I have been working to revert vandalism for some time now, mostly patrolling Recent changes. I have used Twinkle and RedWarn to revert vandalism and warn vandals. Rollback rights would make it easier for me to revert obvious vandalism. Thanks. Charliehdb (talk) 10:57, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
I've been editing since 2015, with almost 80K edits, and have experience patrolling recent changes such as those in my watchlist. I'm familiar with policies such as VANDAL and WARN, and regularly use appropriate edit summaries and warning templates, through the use of Twinkle and RedWarn. Having rollback rights would help me revert clear cases of vandalism more effectively. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 15:35, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
I have been engaging in recent changes patrolling for some time now, so I'd like to request rollback permission primarily to be able to use tools, so that I can patrol more quickly and efficiently. Thanks. Kovcszaln6 (talk) 17:38, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
I've been actively patrolling recent changes for a significant amount of time and have developed a solid understanding of Wikipedia’s guidelines on vandalism and disruptive edits. Throughout this period, I’ve consistently identified and reverted problematic edits, but doing this manually can be time-consuming. Having rollback rights would allow me to handle these issues more quickly and efficiently, helping ensure Wikipedia stays a reliable resource. I’m committed to using these tools responsibly and continuing to contribute effectively to the project. Thank you DelphiLore (talk) 19:11, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
I regularly patrol the recent changes page using filters that flag edits that may have problems or could be vandalism. With confirmed vandals, I keep an eye on their contributions for a short time afterwards to catch any resumed vandalism, while continuing to patrol recent changes. I previously used RedWarn, but I currently use UltraViolet and Twinkle. Rollback would enhance my recent change patrolling and anti-vandalism efforts. Thank you. R0paire-wiki (talk) 04:48, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
|
Requests for template editor |
---|
Template editor
I already work on templates from time to time, to improve formatting, fix links, add features, etc. My record speaks for itself that I am careful in making changes. Thanks. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:27, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
Due to the chronic shortage of admins at DYK to perform prep-to-queue moves, the protection levels were recently downgraded to Template editor - really per WT:DYK#Plan of action v2 but you may wish to start at WT:DYK#Giving queues template instead of full protection? for the full context. I would like to help with this. Launchballer 16:06, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Standard Guidelines review:
— Martin (MSGJ · talk) 08:22, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
|
Usage
{{Admin dashboard/header}}
{{Admin dashboard/ab}}
{{#ifeq:{{Yesno|{{{showaiv|7 days}}}}}|yes|{{#ifexpr:{{#time:U|-{{{showaiv|7 days}}}}}-{{#time:U|{{REVISIONTIMESTAMP:WP:Administrator intervention against vandalism}}}} <= 0|{{Admin dashboard/aiv}}}}}}
{{Admin dashboard/csd}}
{{Admin dashboard/uaarfpp}}
{{Admin dashboard/rfarfp
| 1 = {{{style|}}}{{#if:{{{showperm|}}}|
{{!}} showperm {{=}} {{{showperm}}} }}{{#if:{{{showrfab|}}}|
{{!}} showrfab {{=}} {{{showrfab}}} }}{{#if:{{{showacc|}}}|
{{!}} showacc {{=}} {{{showacc}}}} }}{{#if:{{{showaptl|}}}|
{{!}} showaptl {{=}} {{{showaptl}}} }}{{#if:{{{showawb|}}}|
{{!}} showacc {{=}} {{{showawb}}}} }}{{#if:{{{showconf|}}}|
{{!}} showconf {{=}} {{{showconf}}} }}{{#if:{{{showfmvr|}}}|
{{!}} showext {{=}} {{{showext}}} }}{{#if:{{{showacc|}}}|
{{!}} showacc {{=}} {{{showevco}}}} }}{{#if:{{{showext|}}}|
{{!}} showfmvr {{=}} {{{showfmvr}}} }}{{#if:{{{showmms|}}}|
{{!}} showmms {{=}} {{{showmms}}} }}{{#if:{{{showrevr|}}}|
{{!}} shownpr {{=}} {{{shownpr}}} }}{{#if:{{{shownpr|}}}|
{{!}} showpmvr {{=}} {{{showpmvr}}} }}{{#if:{{{showpmvr|}}}|
{{!}} showrevr {{=}} {{{showrevr}}} }}{{#if:{{{showrlbk|}}}|
{{!}} showrlbk {{=}} {{{showrlbk}}} }}{{#if:{{{showte|}}}|
{{!}} showte {{=}} {{{showte}}} }}
}}
{{Admin dashboard/footer|newadmin={{{newadmin|no}}}}}<!--
You can re-arrange the order or pick and choose by transcluding elements separately -->
Note that directly transcluding the template or using all the subtemplates above can cause the page to exceed the post-expand include size.
Parameters
TemplateData for Admin dashboard
Administrators Dashboard
Parameter | Description | Type | Status | |
---|---|---|---|---|
style | 1 | Backwards compatibility. Not entirely show of purpose at this time.
| String | optional |
New administrator | newadmin | Allows you to toggle the 'New administrators' navbox on/off. Set to 'yes' to transclude.
| String | optional |
Show AIV | showaiv | Allows you to toggle the WP:AIV section on/off. Set to 'no' to prevent transclusion.
| String | optional |
Show PERM | showperm | Allows control over the entire WP:PERM section in one parameter. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show sections that have had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
Show RfA/RfB | showrfab | Allows hiding the requests for RfA/RfB section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
Show account creator | showacc | Allows hiding the requests for account creator section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
Show autopatrolled | showaptl | Allows hiding the requests for autopatrolled section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
Show confirmed | showconf | Allows hiding the requests for confirmed section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
Show extended confirmed | showext | Allows hiding the requests for extended confirmed section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
Show file mover | showfmvr | Allows hiding the requests for file mover section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
Show new page reviewer | shownpr | Allows hiding the requests for new page reviewer section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
Show page mover | showpmvr | Allows hiding the requests for page mover section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
Show reviewer | showrevr | Allows hiding the requests for reviewer section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
Show rollback | showrlbk | Allows hiding the requests for rollback section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
Show template editor | showte | Allows hiding the requests for template editor section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |