Wikipedia talk:Article creep

	This page is within the scope of WikiProject Wikipedia essays, a collaborative effort to organise and monitor the impact of Wikipedia essays. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion. For a listing of essays see the essay directory.Wikipedia essaysWikipedia:WikiProject Wikipedia essaysTemplate:WikiProject Wikipedia essaysWikiProject Wikipedia essays pages
Low	This page has been rated as Low-impact on the project's impact scale.
	The above rating was automatically assessed using data on pageviews, watchers, and incoming links.

This essay was made from sections of the WP:CREEP essay, which now only applies the creep concept to policies and guidelines. After discussion on that talk page, there was consensus that the material here was not controversial, but that it would be better to separate the concept of creep into two essays, one for articles and talk pages, the other for policies and guidelines, because the effects of creep were different for the two applications. PPdd (talk) 01:43, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV

The article contains the term "NPOV", but does not provide definition for it. I <guess> that it simply stands for "neutral point of view", but who knows? 129.217.249.6 (talk) 14:17, 17 January 2012 (UTC) Thanks. I fixed it. PPdd (talk) 03:28, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Frog

Why does "WP:FROG" direct here? There is a small example of a frog in boiling water, but I hardly think it justifies a redirect. Mambawarrior (talk) 23:04, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]