Jump to content

Wikipedia:Wiki Ed/SUNY New Paltz/WOM319 Feminist Art and Subculture (Spring 2018)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This Course Wikipedia Resources Connect
Questions? Ask us:

contact@wikiedu.org

Course name
WOM319 Feminist Art and Subculture
Institution
SUNY New Paltz
Instructor
Dr. Jessica N Pabon
Wikipedia Expert
Shalor (Wiki Ed)
Subject
Feminist Art and Subculture
Course dates
2018-03-16 00:00:00 UTC – 2018-05-19 23:59:59 UTC
Approximate number of student editors
26


A survey of major aesthetic and political feminist subcultures, throughout the Americas, from the World War II era to present day.

Student Assigned Reviewing
Rainegrayson Glitter
Hannahrosebuc Video game culture American Burlesque
Threedeezeens Nava Atlas, Zine Zine, Tattoo, Skateboarding
Smnananm LGBT slang
Hansonc1 American burlesque Pin up model
Bogertr1 Feminist comedy LGBT slang
Roger.chat Twink (gay slang)
Chirgwinsara Surf culture Video game culture
WDeniseB Homosexuality in American football, Yarn bombing Yarn bombing
Russoj12
Schendoa1 Ghost Hunting, Drag
Sarahgatti Pin-up
Susiepew Pin-up model Pin up modeling
Jpegallery Pin-up model
Dogperson2007 Emo
Szalayr1 Native Hip Hop Native Hip Hop
Esmearielfemsub Radical cheerleading Radical cheerleading
Femme18 Pachuco Roller Derby
Jlspeakman Skateboarding Feminist comedy
Cyborgbunny88 Goth (subculture)
Loseej1 Straight Edge
Rebeccaf1995 Roller derby Pachuco
Gxbes Ice hockey

Timeline

Week 1

Course meetings
Friday, 16 March 2018
In class - Welcome to Wikipedia! (Art + Feminism Edit-a-thon)

On Friday March 16th, we will begin our Wikipedia learning adventure at the Art + Feminism Edit-a-thon.

Welcome to our Wikipedia project's course timeline. This page will guide you through the Wikipedia project. This page breaks down writing a Wikipedia article into a series of steps, or milestones. These steps include online trainings to help you get started on Wikipedia. New training modules will appear on this timeline as you get to new milestones. Be sure to check back and complete them! Incomplete trainings will be reflected in your grade. 



Our course has also been assigned a Wikipedia Expert. Check your Talk page for notes from them. You can also reach them through the "Get Help" button on this page. 


We will spend the entire class time at the Edit-a-thon training and doing some editing, so settle in!

Your "to do" list for today: 


  1. Create an account (if you haven't already) and join this course page, using the enrollment link your instructor sent you. (To avoid hitting Wikipedia's account creation limits, this is best done outside of class. Only 6 new accounts may be created per day from the same IP address.) 
  2. Once you have a Wiki account, enroll in the Art + Feminism event dashboard: https://outreachdashboard.wmflabs.org/courses/SUNY_New_Paltz/Art_Feminism_Edit_a_Thon_(March_7,_2018)?enroll=kbywfons
  3. Read the following handouts: 
  4.  Complete the following trainings:
  •  Due before you leave class Friday:
    • Finish readings and trainings (should take about an hour)
    • Practice by:
      • introducing yourself to a classmate on that classmate’s Talk page
      • complete one of the following tasks:
        • add some citations to an article 
        • add an image to an article 
        • add a sentence or two to an article
        • edit the content on a page for clarity, check hyperlinks are working etc.
      • Make sure to include an edit summary on the Talk page for anything you do!

 
Get sharing: Please tag all Wikipedia edits and all social media posts with #ArtAndFeminism #Noweditingaf #AF5 #npsocial

Milestones

This week, everyone should have a Wikipedia account. All students should have taken class time to get started in Wikipedia AND make their first Wiki edit!

Week 2

Course meetings
Tuesday, 27 March 2018   |   Friday, 30 March 2018
In class - Evaluate Wikipedia

It's time to think critically about Wikipedia articles. You'll evaluate a Wikipedia article related to the course and leave suggestions for improving it on the article's Talk page. 


  • Complete the "Evaluating Articles and Sources" training (linked below).
  •  Create a section in your sandbox titled "Article evaluation" where you'll leave notes about your observations and learnings. 
  •  Choose a page related to class to read and evaluate. As you read, consider and take notes the following questions (but don't feel limited to these): 
    • Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
    • Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
    • Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
    • Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?
    •  Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted? 
    • Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
    •  Check out the Talk page of the article. What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? 
    • How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
    • How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?
  •  Tidy up your notes and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback with four tildes — Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 20:20, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


In class - Discussion
What's a content gap?

Now that you're thinking about what makes a "good" Wikipedia article, consider some additional questions.

  • Wikipedians often talk about "content gaps." What do you think a content gap is, and what are some possible ways to identify them?
  • What are some reasons a content gap might arise? What are some ways to remedy them?
  • Does it matter who writes Wikipedia?
  • What does it mean to be "unbiased" on Wikipedia? How is that different, or similar, to your own definition of "bias"?

Week 3

Course meetings
Tuesday, 3 April 2018   |   Friday, 6 April 2018
In class - Discussion
Thinking about sources and plagiarism
  • Blog posts and press releases are considered poor sources of reliable information. Why?
  • What are some reasons you might not want to use a company's website as the main source of information about that company?
  • What is the difference between a copyright violation and plagiarism?
  • What are some good techniques to avoid close paraphrasing and plagiarism?


Assignment - Illustrate an article

You'll want to find or create an appropriate photo, illustration, or piece of video/audio to add to an article.


  •  Before you start, review the Illustrating Wikipedia handbook, or see Editing Wikipedia pages 10–11. 
  • When you've reviewed those pages, take the training linked below.
  •  When you're ready to start finding images, remember: Never grab images you find through an image search, or those found on Instagram, Tumblr, Reddit, Imgur, or even so-called "Free image" or "free stock photo" websites. Instead, you'll want to find images with clear proof that the creator has given permission to use their work. Many of these images can be found on search.creativecommons.org
  •  Don't just upload an image to Wikipedia. Instead, upload it to Wikipedia's sister site for images, Wikimedia Commons. For instructions, read through the Illustrating Wikipedia handbook. 


Assignment - Add to an article

Familiarize yourself with editing Wikipedia by adding a citation to an article. There are two ways you can do this:


  • Add 1-2 sentences to a course-related article, and cite that statement to a reliable source, as you learned in the online training.
  •  The Citation Hunt tool shows unreferenced statements from articles. First, evaluate whether the statement in question is true! An uncited statement could just be lacking a reference or it could be inaccurate or misleading. Reliable sources on the subject will help you choose whether to add it or correct the statement. 


Assignment - Choose your topic / Find your sources

It's time to choose an article and assign it to yourself.


  • Review page 6 of your Editing Wikipedia guidebook.
  •  Find an article to work on.
  •  In your sandbox, write a few sentences about what you plan to contribute to the selected article. 
    •  Think back to when you did an article critique. What can you add? Post some of your ideas to the article's talk page. 
    •  Compile a list of relevant, reliable books, journal articles, or other sources. Post that bibliography to the talk page of the article you'll be working on, and in your sandbox. Make sure to check in on the Talk page to see if anyone has advice on your bibliography. 


Guide(s) for writing articles in your topic area

Women's Studies

Week 4

Course meetings
Tuesday, 10 April 2018   |   Friday, 13 April 2018
In class - Draft your article edits

You've picked a topic and found your sources. Now it's time to start writing.


  •  Identify what's missing from the current form of the article. Think back to the skills you learned while critiquing an article. Make notes for improvement in your sandbox

Keep reading your sources, too, as you prepare to write the body of the article.



Resources: Editing Wikipedia pages 7–9


Milestones

Everyone has begun writing their article drafts.

Week 5

Course meetings
Tuesday, 17 April 2018   |   Friday, 20 April 2018
In class - Discussion
Thinking about Wikipedia
  • What do you think of Wikipedia's definition of "neutrality"?
  • What are the impacts and limits of Wikipedia as a source of information?
  • On Wikipedia, all material must be attributable to reliable, published sources. What kinds of sources does this exclude? Can you think of any problems that might create?
  • If Wikipedia was written 100 years ago, how might its content (and contributors) be different? What about 100 years from now?


In class - Expand your draft
  • Keep working on transforming your article into a complete first draft. Get draft ready for peer-review.
  • If you'd like a Wikipedia Expert to review your draft, now is the time! Click the "Get Help" button in your sandbox to request notes.


In class - Peer review and copy edit
  • First, take the "Peer Review" online training.
  • Select a classmate’s article that you will peer review and copyedit. On the Articles tab, find the article that you want to review. Then in the "My Articles" section of the Home tab, assign it to yourself to review.
  • Peer review your classmate's draft. Leave suggestions on the Talk page of the article, or sandbox, that your fellow student is working on. Other editors may be reviewing your work, so look for their comments! Be sure to acknowledge feedback from other Wikipedians.
  • As you review, make spelling, grammar, and other adjustments. Pay attention to the tone of the article. Is it encyclopedic?
Milestones

Every student has finished reviewing their assigned articles, making sure that every article has been reviewed.


Assignment - Respond to your peer review

You probably have some feedback from other students and possibly other Wikipedians. It's time to work with that feedback to improve your article!

  • Read Editing Wikipedia pages 12 and 14.
  • Return to your draft or article and think about the suggestions. Decide which ones to start implementing. Reach out to your instructor or your Wikipedia Expert if you have any questions.

Week 6

Course meetings
Tuesday, 24 April 2018   |   Friday, 27 April 2018
In class - Begin moving your work to Wikipedia

Once you've made improvements to your article based on peer review feedback, it's time to move your work to Wikipedia proper - the "mainspace."

Editing an existing article?

  • NEVER copy and paste your draft of an article over the entire article. Instead, edit small sections at a time.
  • Copy your edits into the article. Make many small edits, saving each time, and leaving an edit summary. Never replace more than one to two sentences without saving!
  • Be sure to copy text from your sandbox while the sandbox page is in 'Edit' mode. This ensures that the formatting is transferred correctly.

Creating a new article?

Week 7

Course meetings
Tuesday, 1 May 2018   |   Friday, 4 May 2018
Assignment - Continue improving your article

Do additional research and writing to make further improvements to your article, based on suggestions and your own critique.

  • Read Editing Wikipedia page 12 to see how to create links from your article to others, and from other articles to your own. Try to link to 3–5 articles, and link to your article from 2–3 other articles.
  • Consider adding an image to your article. Wikipedia has strict rules about what media can be added, so make sure to take Contributing Images and Media Files training before you upload an image.


Assignment - Polish your work

Continue to expand and improve your work, and format your article to match Wikipedia's tone and standards. Remember to contact your Wikipedia Expert at any time if you need further help!

Week 8

Course meetings
Tuesday, 8 May 2018   |   Friday, 11 May 2018
Assignment - Final article

It's the final week to develop your article.


  • Read Editing Wikipedia page 15 to review a final check-list before completing your assignment.
  • Don't forget that you can ask for help from your Wikipedia Expert at any time!


Write a reflective essay (2–4 pages) on your Wikipedia contributions.


Consider the following questions as you reflect on your Wikipedia assignment:


  • Critiquing articles: What did you learn about Wikipedia during the article evaluation? How did you approach critiquing the article you selected for this assignment? How did you decide what to add to your chosen article?
  • Summarizing your contributions: include a summary of your edits and why you felt they were a valuable addition to the article. How does your article compare to earlier versions?
  • Peer Review: If your class did peer review, include information about the peer review process. What did you contribute in your review of your peers article? What did your peers recommend you change on your article?
  • Feedback: Did you receive feedback from other Wikipedia editors, and if so, how did you respond to and handle that feedback?
  • Wikipedia generally: What did you learn from contributing to Wikipedia? How does a Wikipedia assignment compare to other assignments you've done in the past? How can Wikipedia be used to improve public understanding of our field/your topic? Why is this important?
Milestones

Everyone should have finished all of the work they'll do on Wikipedia, and be ready for grading.