Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 February 1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

February 1

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 17:44, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Only transcluded in one article, Mountbatten-Windsor, in which it is redundant to the section entitled "Male-line descendants of Elizabeth II", which contains links to all of the articles contained in this navigation template. It is probably not included in the articles of its other constituents because it is redundant to the sidebar Template:House of Windsor. Bsherr (talk) 23:54, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 17:45, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

One transclusion. Substitute and delete. Steel1943 (talk) 23:17, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 17:45, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

One transclusion. Substitute and delete. Steel1943 (talk) 23:09, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 04:04, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This was created to prevent persistent vandalism of the infobox image. Since that need no longer exists and the template is only transcluded on one page, it serves no purpose. - MrX 🖋 21:26, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete per criterion G7 by Athaenara. Steel1943 (talk) 20:14, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Templates with unclear usage potential. The only transclusions of these templates are on a user's subpage. Either move to User:CharlieHuang/Template:Qinpu and User:CharlieHuang/Template:Qinpu LS without leaving redirects (and replace their sole transclusion) or delete. Steel1943 (talk) 18:37, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 17:45, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template has 1 transclusion as a external referenced section on a page, thus this template is unnecessary. Substitute and delete. Steel1943 (talk) 18:33, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:The Simpsons. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 17:44, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Simpsons characters with Template:The Simpsons.
{{The Simpsons}} already has a section for "Characters". Not all of those listed on {{Simpsons characters}} are there so obviously those will need to be moved over, but seems like a straightforward obvious merge then redirect. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 17:12, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Lehigh Valley Transit Company templates

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 17:43, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

These were mostly redirects to the SEPTA family of S-line templates. I've split them out to Module:Adjacent stations/Lehigh Valley Transit Company. All transclusions replaced. Mackensen (talk) 01:44, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 17:42, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This specific-source template is for a government gateway which, according to the Wayback Machine, has been permanently down since February 2009, and no replacement site appears to have been built. Delete. Flapjacktastic (talk) 01:14, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).