Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2011 September 5

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

September 5

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 18:07, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Navbox Company (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused and redundant to Template:Infobox company. Toshio Yamaguchi (talk) 14:35, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:25, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, unmodified since 20 June 2006. EmanWilm (talk) 14:00, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Deleted by Fastily. CSD G2. (non-admin closure) --Σ talkcontribs 07:50, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox art group (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

marked "not for use" since 2008 (actually used in just three articles). Redundant to {{Infobox organisation}}. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 12:20, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was subst and delete for the one userpage. JPG-GR (talk) 18:09, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Insane (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Pointless template with 2 transclusions, not really humorous, and which user? Rcsprinter (talk) 09:57, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Userfy to the one user who is using it (Notedgrant - the other use is in a sandbox). — This, that, and the other (talk) 11:05, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 18:10, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Selection of Steinway's Royal Warrants of Appointment (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template's purpose is purely promotional. None of the linked articles have information about the Steinway warrant. Binksternet (talk) 07:06, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.