Jump to content

User talk:Zhongshuangyu

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome

[edit]
Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zhongshuangyu (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

No Abusing multiple accounts. I have only one account.

Decline reason:


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zhongshuangyu (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I have only one account. I can use only public network. I was blocked infinitive long? why? Anything i should learn before editing the one or two subjects i like? Did i do anything unreasonable caused a infinitive block? The previous reason you gave me too roughly to understand.

Decline reason:

You are either one person who has used more than one account or one of two or three people making substantially the same edits to support one another. Either way, you have taken part in use of more than one account and logged out anonymous edits to edit disruptively, edit warring to impose a personal view unsupported by reliable sources. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:24, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.


This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zhongshuangyu (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

The system said " This account is a sock puppet of Isuzu1001 ", that is definitely wrong. I don't know who is it. I have no more than one account. I wouldn't accept what you said. Even i deleted the warming showed on my page, i don't think i deserve to be blocked indefinitely long. Anyway, thank you for the quick reply. But i am not happy what happened to me. Please review every logs about me, every IP i used, definitely i am not a sock puppet of Isuzu1001.

Decline reason:

Whether you're engaged in sockpuppetry or meatpuppetry, the similarity is inescapable and far too close to be coincidental. Both sock- and meatpuppetry are unacceptable. Seraphimblade Talk to me 01:05, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.


I just have a read of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Isuzu1001/Archive I am so happy. I can't believed there is a person on other place support some of my idea. Maybe he is a reader of my website. But anyway, i am not a Sockpuppet. I am who i am definitely only one in the world.


I require an investigate on the Sockpuppet of Isuzu1001 case again. I wanna talk about the editing happened on the term Ethnic issues in the People's Republic of China is not really wrong. i have a discussion with others on a culture forum. These slurs below are very very command and understanding in Canton area. Reference is from everyone Cantonese if you have a chance talk to them. But if you can't accept it, that's fine. Only know less.

岭南猴子 (lingnán houzi) - "monkey of the south", a slur for Cantonese people. This slur refer to the body size of Cantonese because they are usually short and skinny. Moreover, Cantonese usually have darker skin color than those northern origin. 南蛮 (nanman) - "southern barbarian", a slur for Cantonese people. This slur originally came from more than 2,000 years ago, when the southern states were still free from Chinese administration. They call them barbarian because those southern people have customs similar to pacific islanders. 粤猴 (yuehou) - "yue(viet) monkey", a slur similar to 岭南猴子, but more focus on Cantonese people's south east Asia origin. Slurs against Cantonese people become more and more popular amount northern Han Chinese after the Pro-Cantonese protest happened in July-August 2010.


I added an ethnic Cantonese to the ethnic of the world term. "People based in Guangdong, Guangxi, Hainan, Hong Kong, Macau of southeast of asia which also called yue ethnic. Due to Han government’s policy some of them are living in USA, Australia and other countries sometimes would easily be confused with Han."

I still stand on it because there is a DNA research and result supporting that.

Furthermore, just jump into Http://ifree.xp3.biz my website have a look. Explain everything about Cantonese.

Thank you.



11:13PM 22/11/2011 Local time


One more thing, on the term Controversy over use of Cantonese by Guangzhou Television.

The title is really wrong and misleading.

That's not the translation of 2010廣州撐粵語行動 the Chinese version term. (exactly translated to "Activities of protecting speaking mother language Cantonese in Canton 2010" )

Anyway, a government have some workers for editing Wiki English version (about some activities happened there)to mislead foreigners (comparing to Chinese).

That is political. I am blocked as well.

(Non-administrator comment) You should understand why you are blocked? You are using multiple accounts to bypass your main account's block. You should appeal your block at your main account. Mohamed Aden Ighe (talk) 01:43, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I had only one Wikipedia account until last week. I am angry with you the Wikipedia admin team. Don't let me say again. I am not more than one account until last week. I can vow with God as a Christian for that. Zhongshuangyu (talk) 02:21, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]