Jump to content

User talk:Wpjustice

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hey, I will try and work towards justice.

Wpjustice (talk) 17:36, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]


This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wpjustice (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

The manner in which I have been blocked without explaining any reasons and based only on suspect, is questionable. Also there has been no formal investigation done and no evidence is provided, please provide evidence, I claim to be clean Wpjustice (talk) 17:19, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

There are a high number of behavioral similarities between this account and the large number of other accounts identified as belonging to Padmalakshmisx. In any event, the username of this account is inappropriate as per the username policy, as it implies some sort of official judicial role. Hersfold non-admin(t/a/c) 18:14, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Wpjustice (talk) 17:19, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]


As per the Blocking_policy Indefinite_blocks are applied when there is significant disruption or threats of disruption, or major breaches of policy. I request the administrator to provide evidence that I am a sock puppet. Wpjustice (talk) 17:37, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]