User talk:WGH Schmitt

This is WGH Schmitt's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Siegmund Hadda has been accepted

Siegmund Hadda, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 23:50, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Carl Simon Fried (March 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Not significant enough to satisfy our standards.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Carl Simon Fried and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 18:43, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Carl Simon Fried (August 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dodger67 was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Carl Simon Fried and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 21:55, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! WGH Schmitt, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 21:55, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

{{subst:Wikipedia:Teahouse/Suggestions/SuggestBot |category1= Thanks for the critical review. I learned a lot. I will careful rewrite my submission and try to find a neutral point of view. I try to convince the Wikipedia community Fried deserves more recognition. Since 1933 his papers have only exceptionally been cited in Germany; He has been deported to the Buchenwald concentration camp. He had to flee to Brazil. where his language had been forbidden. Since “Sister twister” requested to prove Carl Fried’s notability, so I had to mention several citations of famous radiotherapists. In your opinion, how can I solve this dilemma between being neutral and at the same time proving his notability? Besides I have a second question: In my letter from Sept. 15. 2017. I compared Fried with his colleague, also radiotherapist in the Frankfurt Region, Boris Rajewsky. I noticed the discrepancy in his Wikipedia article: Rajewsky’s many honors are listed but the dark sides of his personality remain unmentioned. In Rajewsky’s article Reference Nr.2. (Klee) is cited in an incomplete und misleading way. How can I improve this article? Wolfgang |category2= |category3=

Your submission at Articles for creation: Carl Simon Fried has been accepted

Carl Simon Fried, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Galobtter (talk) 11:37, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]