Jump to content

User talk:Status/2011/09

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Re:

[edit]

Congrates on finding that lol! JamesAlan1986 *talk 10:35, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Can you help with with "Supergirl" by Hilary Duff? JamesAlan1986 *talk 23:07, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Works for me I found some genres that can be added to it if that's okay? JamesAlan1986 *talk 03:16, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

KK. Did you get everything you needed off it cause I'm gonna blank the page. JamesAlan1986 *talk 03:19, 2 September 2011 (UTC) Got it redirected. You know for a promotional single it's actually hard to find a review for it. JamesAlan1986 *talk 03:27, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

All the references I've found have considered it pop, rock, teen pop the stuff I had posted so I think pop rock is fine. Though I'd have left the part about the song being 2:53 cause everywhere I've looked that's what it says. JamesAlan1986 *talk 03:31, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Here's some interesting information from the liner booklet. Parts of the lyrics from "The Getaway" were accidentally added to lyrics of "Supergirl". JamesAlan1986 *talk 03:36, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I didn't know how else to describe it but isn't that interesting? Check out what I added to the composition and if you can edit it. I used the lyrics to help describe the composition of the song. JamesAlan1986*talk 03:46, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

LOL! It took me forever to figure out that those were the lyrics to "The Getaway" but I knew they were familiar. Guess that happens sometimes. And yeah Burned does say "crow" instead of "crowd", I just looked at mine. Wow that's interesting. JamesAlan1986 *talk 03:59, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You're talking about how the side has that slash in it instead of the colon like the advertisement slip inside it does aren't you? LOL! JamesAlan1986 *talk 04:02, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

LOL Yeah talk about an annoying thing. It's dumb and no offense to Nano but he sometimes reads too much into things or doesn't fully read things. I looked and it does say not to use slashes unless it is talking about the same thing and it's not Hannah Montana 2 is a soundtrack and Meet Miley Cyrus is an album by Cyrus. JamesAlan1986 *talk 04:06, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oh did you know that "Girl Can Rock" on Most Wanted is a remix but isn't credited as such? Another stupid mistake Hollywood Record made.JamesAlan1986 *talk 04:16, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Is it okay if I add that as a note in the track listing and you can post the reference? JamesAlan1986 *talk 04:19, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You talking about "Supergirl"? I'm still looking up stuff for it right now as we speak lol. JamesAlan1986 *talk 04:24, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

K. Can do. Hey fix the Critical Reception someone messed it up. JamesAlan1986 *talk 04:26, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What needs to be done? JamesAlan1986 *talk 04:28, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I can look into that. I removed the information about the I Am Remix there's no way to find a reference for it. JamesAlan1986 *talk 04:51, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Here it is!: http://www.mtv.com/news/articles/1502881/britney-freaks-on-next-episode-chaotic.jhtml JamesAlan1986 *talk 04:58, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It was written on May 24, 2005 and here's what is say:

Tween queen Hilary Duff will release her best-of album of sorts, Most Wanted, on August 16. The album is a collection of some of Duff's most popular songs, along with three new tracks she's currently in the studio working on. ...

I can't believe I found that. JamesAlan1986 *talk 05:03, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Is there anything else I can do? JamesAlan1986 *talk 05:26, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sure do you want me to find more? JamesAlan1986 *talk 05:29, 2 September 2011 (UTC) What you want me to do for the personals? Also I can't find any more reviews. They either use Allmusic's review and a lot of them I found were already used. :( JamesAlan1986 *talk 05:38, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Check out the personal and see if it's better. JamesAlan1986 *talk 05:50, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Okay dokey. Got some more stuff added. JamesAlan1986 *talk 06:47, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Okay give me a second. JamesAlan1986 *talk 06:52, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's [[File:Beat of My Heart.ogg|uploaded]]. JamesAlan1986*talk 07:00, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I went ahead and added it for you and I added it to Beat of My Heart too. JamesAlan1986 *talk 07:07, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Reference 43 on Most Wanted is a dead link. Can you archive it like you did the other one? JamesAlan1986 *talk 07:27, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I got a picture of The Collector's Signature Editon added. :) JamesAlan1986 *talk 08:10, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Don't use this as a reference because it's got downloads but this is how I found out that the Japanese DVD has "Fly" included with the "Learning to Fly" documentary it's pretty much the DVD of "Learning to Fly" lol! http://avaxhome.ws/music/pop/hd_most_wanted_cd_dvd.html JamesAlan1986 *talk 08:29, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's looking a lot better. ^_^ JamesAlan1986 *talk 08:37, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm getting ready to delete it. JamesAlan1986 *talk 08:43, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

So what else needs to be done? JamesAlan1986 *talk 09:09, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. How come you removed the Target bonus track? JamesAlan1986 *talk 09:14, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I was talking about the I Am Remix status not Do You Want Me?! That was confirmed in both references. JamesAlan1986 *talk 09:18, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You may need to check the reference again on both: http://www.amazon.com/Most-Wanted-Hilary-Duff/dp/B000ME68Y6/ref=sr_1_7?s=music&ie=UTF8&http://www.amazon.com/Most-Wanted-Coll-Hilary-Duff/dp/B000AA7HZ6/ref=cm_cmu_up_thanks_hdr%7C The Collector's Signature Edition has a picture of the target exclusive on it. JamesAlan1986 *talk 09:23, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

And by the way, one of the reviewers is me on there. I make contributions on Amazon.com too. JamesAlan1986 *talk 09:27, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry didn't notice one of the links was messed up my bad. JamesAlan1986*talk 09:29, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's a good track. I'm working on the A Cinderella Story soundtrack page. It's a mess. JamesAlan1986 *talk 12:00, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I was fixing the track listing! :-p JamesAlan1986 *talk 12:13, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well I'm gonna do a little editing to it. JamesAlan1986 *talk 12:17, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What more needs to be done to Most Wanted? JamesAlan1986 *talk 12:23, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, glad I could help with it, check A Cinderella Story (soundtrack) and see what you think of the edit I did to it. JamesAlan1986 *talk 12:27, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hilary Duff

[edit]

Yeah I saw you were working on it during my daily morning stalking :P :D I'll take a look soon. PS: the lead should be expanded though. Novice7 (talk) 11:53, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the hearts in "Hilary", lol. I don't know where that came from. Yep, of course you can create a new section for new songs (maybe "New material" or "Development" or something like that). It shouldn't be short though. Fyi, I did create a sandbox for Most Wanted (you might remember... I think back in November or December). I couldn't complete it and so deleted it. I'm glad you're working on it now Zach :) Did you check Google Books and Google News Archives for information? Novice7 (talk) 12:03, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I can find more reviews for you. First lemme complete the Toni Braxton discography :) I think you can do a composition section too... But, wouldn't it be, you know, duplication of existing information? You can include the information about the new songs, their musical structure etc though in the DEV. section. Novice7 (talk) 12:11, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Here are a few reviews: Hartford Courant, Up Billboard review, of My Heart Billboard review, section. Novice7 (talk) 09:08, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Hilary Duff Is Most Wanted

[edit]

It looks way better then it did before. JamesAlan1986 *talk 13:05, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I would suggest removing the dating link it may keep it from being a GA. JamesAlan1986 *talk 13:13, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah she did. JamesAlan1986 *talk 13:25, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I had to switch browsers somehow Firefox is spamlinking and I have no idea why. JamesAlan1986 *talk 13:30, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oh sorry she doesn't she just talks about the video for "Wake Up" and "Beat of My Heart" though there is something interesting about "Wake Up" that could be noted. That Tokyo, London, Paris and New York are her favorite places (which is why they are mentioned in the song lol!) JamesAlan1986 *talk 13:42, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

She does say when she went into doing "Most Wanted" she didn't know what she wanted at the time. Exact quote: "When I did the new songs for my Most Wanted record, I didn't even really know what I wanted at the time, I just knew that when I heard these songs, they were really catchy...and I liked them and I thought it was a cool direction to go from, this kind of like, pop rock sound, that I was doing before and then moving into this kind of...still pop music but adding like this semi-dance edge but still with all the real instruments." JamesAlan1986 *talk 13:51, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Exact quote about it favorite places mentioned in "Wake Up": "So it's really a catchy song but it talks about being in all my favorite places in the world, which is Tokyo and Paris and London and New York and we..." goes into the different looks in the video. Both these quotes come from At Home With Hilary Duff. JamesAlan1986 *talk 13:58, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think a lot of that has to do with rushing and putting out an album almost every year. From 2002-2005 that's all she did was put out one album after the other. 2006 she didn't put out anything (other then "Play With Fire" as a teaser for Dignity) then she releasedDignity in 2007 and in 2008 the put out her Best of. That's too much. Doesn't give much chance to put out many singles either. JamesAlan1986 *talk 14:38, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see how that's possible unless they're saying four songs scrapped were "Wake Up", "Beat of My Heart", "Break My Heart" and "Supergirl" those were the only new songs on Most Wanted', the rest came from Metamorphosis, A Cinderella Story and Hilary Duff. (Sorry I don't count the lyric changed "Why Not" as from The Lizzie McGuire Movie, I consider it from Metamorphosis.) JamesAlan1986 *talk 14:48, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Honestly, very likely cause of how fast she did Most Wanted. JamesAlan1986 *talk 14:55, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

But there was no soundtrack released for "The Perfect Man" least not that I ever heard. JamesAlan1986 *talk 14:57, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That's cause her and Joel broke up sometime after "Material Girls" was done shooting he couldn't have gotten involved in her music after that he could've cared less. I know about Hilary Duff having the songs from "Raise Your Voice" I still have the sticker on mine and it says "Includes SPECIAL BONUS songs from Hilary's new movie RAISE YOUR VOICE. But I don't know I looked at the track listing for "The Perfect Man" soundtrack and there's no Hilary songs on it. JamesAlan1986 *talk 15:06, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think some of the dye seeped into her brain cause in the "At Home With Hilary Duff" she was talking like that about Most Wanted and it was already released. I don't think she ever grasped that she didn't do more then three songs for the album (four if you include "Supergirl").JamesAlan1986 *talk 15:08, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I doubt Disney would take the time or day but you could twitter her about it. I feel she has something wrong with her. Part of why I think things went down so nastily with her and her label. I mean she kept saying she was gonna release a new album since 2008 but here it is almost 4 years later and she didn't and then ends up knocked up. I seriously doubt she's gonna sing again, her career is over if she'd come back now her singles wouldn't hit the charts cause no one really cares about it anymore. The only thing she could probably get money for is the thing she started out with in the first place, acting. JamesAlan1986 *talk 15:16, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GRR

[edit]

Toa Nidhiki05 is getting on my nerves. Twice now he's switched the genre on Speak Now and no consensus was agreed upon on either and he's doing it anyway GRRRRRR! JamesAlan1986 *talk 14:05, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

We need to watch him though, from what I've seen on his talk page he's been getting into edit wars a lot on here. JamesAlan1986 *talk 14:17, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

HELP! JamesAlan1986 *talk 14:27, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I figured it meant all changes (edits). Oiy goyem people need to get specific when they put up warnings sheesh... lol. Thanks though. ^_^JamesAlan1986 *talk 14:31, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The information that user added is sourced, but I don't think twitpic is reliable. You may need to copyedit the article and format the refs again. Oz talk23:15, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've noticed the user has changed a few things around and unformatted some of the refs. You need to remove the Twitter sources and add the{{Citation needed}} template or find reliable sources. Oz talk 23:24, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I've reverted it back to yours now. Oz talk 23:33, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Your welcome! :) Oz talk 23:37, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your behavior, yet again

[edit]

I have explained this to you before, and you are doing it again. Removing valid edits (the reassessment), and writing in caps, just so you can restore your own preferred version. It's one of the basic elements of WP:EQ that you don't do that. I'll bring it to WP:WQA the next time. Please work on your etiquette. Nymf hideliho! 07:39, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have explained to this user already what he is doing is wrong. Tell me how NOMINATING AN ARTICLE FOR GA (IN WHICH I AND OTHER EDITORS HAVE WORKED HARD ON) WITHOUT MAKING A SINGLE EDIT TO IT IS RIGHT? Am I'm having bad behavior? — Status{talkcontribs  21:02, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
There we go again with the etiquette problems. Don't scream at people! I won't tell you again. And for your information, anyone may nominate articles for GA status. No one owns the article, and it is not up to you to decide who does these things. Besides, it is not the GA edit that is the issue here, it is the fact that you scream at people and blindly revert other edits as well all the time. Also, keep the discussion at your talk page as per the edit notice. Thank you. Nymf hideliho! 22:44, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Wow. After looking into this, Status is totally right for getting upset. I view it (and anyone normal, I guess that excludes you Nymf, sorry, truth hurts) as a big disrespect for an editor to go and claim an article as their own work when they haven't even edited it. You are twisting Wiki policy, and really are being disruptive. Wiki:OWN? WTF? Do you know what that means? The argument isn't that he owns the article, but that he should be credited with his own work. Status, this should be reported to an admin, Hilary Duff has already been nominated far too many times.--CallMeNathanTalk2Me 23:04, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Typically if you haven't edited an article, you ask the actual contributors for permission before nominating it for GA. Clearly Status doesn't want you to nominate Hilary Duff, so you should accept his response and move on. Regards, Ruby comment! 23:32, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
To Nymf, I am not screaming, using caps provides EMPHASIS. So, it's fine if someone has worked on getting an article for GA for years (as one user has, and I even notified them of this problem) and someone else who hasn't made ONE EDIT to it can nominate it and receive credit for it? Um, NO. I haven't even made that many contributions to the article, so I don't see how this would have anything to do with WP:OWN, this is about principal. I didn't cuss him out for nominating it for GA. I left a message on his talk telling him that it is rude nominating an article for GA that you haven't made one contribution to. He left a reply telling me that anyone can nominate an article for GA, no matter if they many any edits to it, which is not correct. He then went and nominated it again. What have I done wrong here, riddle me that? —Status {talkcontribs  23:39, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
As I said, the GA status nomination is not the issue here, so Ruby2010 and Petergriffin9901, your points are moot. I suggest you stay out of the discussion, as you have nothing to add to it (and I am not the one looking to nominate it). Status, typing in caps makes it look like you scream (quoting from WP:SHOUT: "Capital letters are considered shouting and are virtually never appropriate"). The issue here is you screaming and blindly reverting valid edits to your own preferred version. Last time I caught you doing this was atJennifer Love Hewitt. In short: stop typing in caps, and stop blindly reverting valid edits. Nymf hideliho! 00:02, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
(edit conflict) Well, that's what this is all about, so it's valid. Yes, last time I was being quite rude and bitter about it, but that has nothing to do with the case now. In short, that's all you could have told me: to stop typing in all caps, and I would have listened. It's something that I have always done to emphasis. And again, after seeing that there was a reassessment made, I fixed it right away, so that shouldn't be an issue. Everyone makes mistake, and you don't need to leave a message saying: "Your behavior, yet again". Seems as if you are the one assuming bad faith in me, as if I do this all the time, just because we ran into a situation previously. Oh and as Nathan did, I'll use bolding from now on for emphasis. — Status {talkcontribs  00:10, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It is not the first time I bring this up (hence the "again"), and looking at your edit history, I see quite a lot edits with etiquette problems. Work on your tone, the caps and pay attention to what you revert, and I am sure everything will be fine.Nymf hideliho! 00:14, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, and bolding should only be used sparsely, as it may also look like you are raising your voice. Italics is probably better for emphasizing things. Nymf hideliho! 00:18, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

[edit]

How are you Zach. I was wondering about J-Lo's soundtracks. I think that we should remove "Alive" cause it's not present in the officialEnough soundtrack, you can see here and about Bordertown, I can not find any source :/ ! Tomica1111Question Existing? 10:29, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Btw, just to let you know, I nominated "Disturbia" for GA. So If you want to review it, you can take it. :) Tomica1111Question Existing? 19:47, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Did you really create 4 Intimate Nights with Beyoncé? Just re-directing a page means created now? Jivesh Talk2Me 11:30, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

His name is in the revision history. Why do you care anyway? I Help, When I Can.[12] 23:51, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
But when i checked i realized that you did not even put any information on that page. Jivesh Talk2Me 04:07, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
In fact i saw it on your list of created articles. I do not know what is wrong with my talk page. I do not know how that happened. Can you fix it? And yes, you are Ending-Start. Your previous name was so good. I wonder why you change it. Anyway, i wanted to tell that i i know sometimes i seemed to be harsh with you. I mean maybe you think i am too possessive of Beyonce articles or what. Well, i would not disagree. I am. I cannot lie. But what i wanted to let you know as well is that i have no hard feelings against you and i consider you as a friend, although not a very good one but at least a good one. JiveshTalk2Me 10:47, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

[edit]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs
Santa Claus Lane (song)
Feel the Noise
Spaceship (Tinchy Stryder song)
Hotel Malibu
Sure Thing (Miguel song)
Hilary Duff: This Is Now
Second Chances (TV series)
In the Air (Chipmunk song)
Hilary Lindh
What Is Free to a Good Home?
Lizzie McGuire (soundtrack)
Chico Bennett
My Little Girl
When I Had the Chance
Best Love Song
All About Aubrey
On the Floor (album)
Hilary Mason
Alive (Jennifer Lopez song)
Cleanup
This Is Me... Then
S&M (song)
Who You Are (Jessie J album)
Merge
I Wanna Go Crazy
Aphrodite (album)
Aphrodite (song)
Add Sources
Why Not (song)
DanceLife
The Back-up Plan
Wikify
Infamous 2
Promises Treatment Centers
Helen Love
Expand
Dicen Que El Tiempo
Come Clean (Hilary Duff song)
Le Grand Journal (Canal+)

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards fromNettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 15:07, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Re:

[edit]

Sorry I've had a busy weekend what's up? JamesAlan1986 *talk 15:46, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Trying to find out what's going on between me and my best friend. JamesAlan1986 *talk 15:49, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Just so you know I didn't change the date. It was an IP user and I'm not in the mood to fight with vandalist today lol. JamesAlan1986 *talk 15:55, 4 September 2011 (UTC)"[reply]

Yeah they're teeing me off today all over the place vandalising stuff I've had to do several reverts already today. JamesAlan1986 *talk 16:04, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

For some reason firefox isn't agreeing with wikipedia. JamesAlan1986 *talk 16:15, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah so I'm using Google Chrome now. Check this out it's awesome! Who ever did that is good. A friend sent me that. JamesAlan1986 *talk 16:33, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

K. I gotta reupload "Supergirl then. JamesAlan1986 *talk 16:51, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It got deleted won't take me be a few seconds hold on. JamesAlan1986*talk 16:56, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Both are uploaded. JamesAlan1986 *talk 17:03, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I added a bit to the composition section. JamesAlan1986 *talk 17:09, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

And no problem I have fun uploading the music samples ^_^ JamesAlan1986*talk 17:10, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi quick discussion, on the Xtina "You Lost Me" article I don't believe that using two copyrighted images is appropriate. One illustrates a release, but the second is useless and the justification that is placed in the rational use of the image is useless. I didn't want to start an edit war or anything. But look at pages like Lady Gaga's "Judas", it only has one cover, but the CD Single had a different one, with nearly all 90's single articles multiple covers were created but I just don't think it is appropriate for this article. Have you got any thoughts, I really don't believe it adds anything to the article.

  • In the rationale, it states;
    "The entire cover: because the image is cover art, a form of product packaging, the entire image is needed to identify the product, properly convey the meaning and branding intended, and avoid tarnishing or misrepresenting the image."
    Now all of that has no relation to the image or the article. Branding and misrepresentation are all avoided with one cover.

Also...

  • "Main infobox. The image is used for identification in the context of critical commentary of the work for which it serves as cover art. It makes a significant contribution to the user's understanding of the article, which could not practically be conveyed by words alone. The image is placed in the infobox at the top of the article discussing the work, to show the primary visual image associated with the work, and to help the user quickly identify the work and know they have found what they are looking for. Use for this purpose does not compete with the purposes of the original artwork, namely the artist's providing graphic design services to music concerns and in turn marketing music to the public."
    Nearly all of this doesn't apply, identification is not an issue, the cover does nothing. No critical commentary discusses any artwork. It makes absolutely no significant contribution, generally this has no relevance.

So any thoughs? Thanks in advance --FeuDeJoie (talk) 01:40, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I don't mind but I think we should choose just one cover. --FeuDeJoie (talk) 12:25, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
By the way, I see you have worked on a lot of the Xtina articles, would you be interested in teaming up to try and improve them all? I just finished "You Lost Me" and I have "Not Myself Tonight" and "Keeps Gettin' Better" in my sandbox, I just suck at writing chart and commercial sides of things. Feel free to say no, just a thought :) --FeuDeJoie (talk) 12:41, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah I'm back to school tomorrow as well! Sucks huh! Well I see you did Kylie's discography, so you know more about the commercial side of things than me. I actually hate writing about charts, but I'm thinking we could co-nominate "You Lost Me" and after "Not Myself Tonight" that too, maybe split the GA load, I do need to format the YLM references but what do you think :) Im hoping we can get Bionic to GA too... Make a good topic!--FeuDeJoie (talk) 22:28, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Radar/Unusual You

[edit]

Zach, could you comment here? How's the tour article going? Xwomanizerx (talk) 02:40, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

'xcuse me? God knows why you RV'd my edits. First of all, USA is not right, it's US. all featured list discographys feature "US". Fair enough about the dates, though. I didn't know. Furthermore, Sweden was certified as "sweden", and no source was present - broken source. ha. Moreover, each and every featured list contains the notes at the top. Also, each and every discography is 85% and not 90%. In future, I will use the edit summary.. but for now, mate, i'm RV'ing the edits, but i will put the dates back :o) If need be, I can get others to say you're wrong... check WP:Discog. Good day.. MusicFan94 (talk) 19:47, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If that wasn't enough.. some french charts and uk chartings were incorrect. Now it isn't letting me undo your edits, they must be done manually. So very well done to you. MusicFan94 (talk) 19:50, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Also, i can't begin to tell you how wrong the info box was at the top... if you want this discog to go FL, that cannot be how it previously was. It was so wrong.. If you wish to remove the notes, do so, i've never liked them myself much, but everything else should remain. Thanks.MusicFan94 (talk) 19:56, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Will do. and sorry if i sounded stuck up or snotty.. just annoys me how people sometimes RV just for their personal preferences or higher on the 'wikipedia scale' or what not.. i want brit discog to go FL, so hopefully we can make it happen - i'll come to it in about half an hour. MusicFan94 (talk) 22:33, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 05 September 2011

[edit]

Hey

[edit]

I got the CD single for "So Yesterday" today. ^_^ JamesAlan1986 *talk 03:55, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Most Wanted

[edit]

Don't think I've forgotten about Most Wanted :) I'll work on it today. Novice7 (talk) 04:21, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey I watched the interview segment on YouTube Presents Taylor Swift and I used some of the information for the Sparks Fly page and I was wondering if you could go and edited it for me. Thanks! JamesAlan1986 *talk 04:57, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey I don't know if you checked but "Sparks Fly" is now a B-Class song article. ^_^ JamesAlan1986 *talk 04:26, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A favor

[edit]

Could you take part in this discussion please, Thanks. Template talk:Navbox musical artist#Films/TV shows being listed in the template QuasyBoy 17:23, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Should I list for GAR? Calvin NaNaNaC'mon! 18:19, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Candadian Speak Now Deluxe Edition I looked at the Product description and it's questionable status that's why I did it with the Taylor Swift Holiday Collection that product description looks like it was done by a user instead of Amazon.com

Deluxe two disc edition features six bonus tracks plus 30 minutes of videos and bonus footage. 2010 release, the third album from the Country/Pop superstar. Speak Now is the follow-up to her multi-million-selling 2008 album, Fearless. The 21-year-old singer/songwriter wrote the entire album on her own and co-produced with longtime collaborator Nathan Chapman, who worked with her on Fearless and her 2006 self-titled debut. Features the single 'Mine_f. Open Road.

Look at the end of it it where it says "Feature the single Mine" that's not an Amazon.com description. JamesAlan1986 *talk 12:16, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is ricky's boyfriend. hes not gonna be on for awhile. im checking his stuff for him. i use to have an account on here but they blocked mine cause they said i was a sockpuppet of his and it wasnt true cause we share the same address as we use a wireless router. but im to let anyone who message him to let them know hes not gonna return for a month. hes got some type of block on his account thatll keep him off till then. hes been getting harrased on here and attacked and hes just had enough for awhile and he says he went and found a way to make it a permanent offline one for awhile. but he still considers you, someone named nano and novice and black yoshi friends and he hopes when he returns that stuff will stop. but thats all i know i cant tell you anymore then that im sorry i am just passing on the message. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.83.198.136 (talk) 22:15, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 12 September 2011

[edit]

You know after first mention, it's last name only? | helpdןǝɥ | 02:13, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Opinion.

[edit]

Talk:Speak Now#Layout edit if you could please give your opinion on this subject. Thanks. JamesAlan1986 *talk 13:38, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Femme Fatale Tour

[edit]

Hey man, could you comment here Talk:Femme Fatale Tour#Edits by User:Itsbydesign? It's ridiculous now. Xwomanizerx (talk) 14:27, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re: I HATE YOU

[edit]

LOL Thanks! I have learned from the best here on Wikipedia. :) - Saulo Talk to Me 21:55, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

[edit]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs
Addiction (Ryan Leslie song)
Cassi Thomson
Michael Brinkenstjärna
Greatest Hits (Aqua album)
Around the World (Aqua video)
Rocko (rapper)
Aqua Mania Remix
Cassis (gastropod)
Hej Matematik
How R U Doin?
Don't Sit Down 'Cause I've Moved Your Chair
Neef Buck
Aqua: The Video Collection
Aqua: The Videos
Love Forever Shines
Do It Again (Cassie Davis song)
Bumble Bees (song)
Frække Frida og de frygtløse spioner
Destructo Doll
Cleanup
Behind the Bridge to Elephunk
Live from Sydney to Vegas
Kim Hill (soul musician)
Merge
Universal Motown Republic Group
Sammie discography
Step Up discography
Add Sources
We Belong to the Sea
Claus Norreen
Amy Winehouse discography
Wikify
1978 UEFA European Under-21 Football Championship
Medindia
Manhattan Clique
Expand
Last Train to Paris
My Humps
Fresh Out the Oven

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 03:15, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why does everyone do this?

[edit]

I'm sorry but Pretty Guardian Sailor Moon is the proper name for the manga. Look at the Harry Potter franchise. You wouldn't go calling the books Harry Potter 1, Harry Potter 2, etc. would you? NO! So why do it to Sailor Moon? That's ridiculous. JamesAlan1986 *talk 05:14, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sailor Moon isn't even the proper name for it and I've always been told we're suppose to publish stuff that isn't US as their proper Japanese name or is that just a pick and chose thing? JamesAlan1986 *talk 05:15, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The best example is Pokemon. They post things properly on there. JamesAlan1986 *talk 05:19, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

And I gave proof that the title was wrong. I gave reference and everyone opposed it it's just like Hannah Montana 2: Meet Miley Cyrus we're posting it improper so it' needs to be moved to it's proper name. JamesAlan1986 *talk 05:22, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The Harry Potter books and movies needs to go as Harry Potter 1, Harry Potter 2, etc. And if you say no then your hypocriting what you say about Sailor Moon cause Harry Potter 1, Harry Potter 2, etc. are common names for the Harry Potter books and movies but yet we don't put them like that. I'm sorry but it seems to me people need to pick and choice their battles here. If Harry shouldn't go by that then neither should those Sailor Moon chapters and they should move cause like I said it's hypocritical to not do it to all. JamesAlan1986 *talk 14:50, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

In the case of Sailor Moon there are only 3. Pretty Soldier Sailor Moon (the anime), Pretty Guardian Sailor Moon (manga & live action), and Sailor Moon (Egnlish dub title). JamesAlan1986 *talk 02:52, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Actually Harry Potter is the best example as there are 2 titles for the first book. Harry Potter and the Philosopher Stone (Worldwide title except in the US). and Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone (in the US only). If you look at the English page it goes by the British release title and as such I think each Sailor Moon paged geared towards certain parts of the "theme" should go by their proper names, the main articles name is Sailor Moon why should the rest go by that name just cause that's how they went when they went English? The only reason the live action has it's proper name is cause it wasn't released in English. JamesAlan1986 *talk 02:59, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I forgot to point out that there are various common names for the Harry Potter books many just using the words past "and the" from the title Eg. "Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows" commonly goes by "Deathly Hallows", etc. Then there's the Harry Potter 7 or whatever, etc. That have also been used as common names but we don't post those on here (we're suppose to according to this) but people just wanna pick and chose their battles and chose pride or incorrect information all the time on here. I will note here that no where in the article itself of the List of Sailor Moon chapters does it mention it's correct name (it's only mentioned in the picture and I put it on there as no one else did) and no one has said anything about that it should be mentioned in the article. Oh well like I've said people just pick and chose. JamesAlan1986 *talk 14:01, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
You been a great friend and a good guidance. JamesAlan1986 *talk 08:42, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A bowl of strawberries for you!

[edit]
With this bowl of strawberries, i want us to start afresh. We have had many conflicts in opinion in the past (and just recently). In fact, i understand your behavior because i also had your age in 2009 (You may find this awkward now but when you will see it two years later, you will find the amount of truth dissimulated in this message). I also went through all these things (here and in real life as well). Sometimes, it is better not to indulge in something unknown to you. As you see whatever i have been saying (was) is justified and i knew it would be. Let's just forget the past. I came here with sincere intentions. Let's be friends and work as a team. A team which does not have useless conflict in opinions. Briefly, i want to be your friend. And you? I hope to get a positive and heartfelt answer. ★Jivesh 1205★ (talk / ♫♫Give 4 a try!!!♫♫) 09:23, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 19 September 2011

[edit]

My recent edit on User:Jimbo Wales...

[edit]

...was deleted. Now, I don't object to this in any way, but why is this? I just thought Jim would like it. I don't want to spark an edit war, I would just like a reason. Thanks in advance. onyx321 11:54, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Before you forgive...

[edit]

...Look at this and contemplate your decision... | helpdןǝɥ | 02:56, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You are making things worst. So what if Jimee wrote that? Whatever Status did in the beginning pissed him off. Can't he be angry? Have you never been angry in your life. If no, you are not a human being. You should tried to understand that all this time we have been here bettering Beyonce's articles, we would not start adding false information only now. ★Jivesh 1205★ (talk / ♫♫Give 4 a try!!!♫♫) 03:57, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hmmm, Status why did you remove this? Please let's be friends. I am really sincere. ★Jivesh 1205★ (talk / ♫♫Give 4 a try!!!♫♫) 05:02, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Please reply. ★Jivesh 1205★ (talk / ♫♫Give 4 a try!!!♫♫) 10:17, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Zach, I would just say this, handle this situation efficiently. I have complete faith in you. And if you ever find them making personal attacks again, let me know. I see that Jivesh has apologized, but the other user named Theuhohreo hasn't. I believe you deserve an apology and again, let me know if it doesn't come. Making personal attacks, and then saying that "I don't care" is the worst unacceptable case. I wouldn't even mind if such users are permabanned. — Legolas (talk2me) 12:02, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hey Status I'm not trying to get involved but from what I've read and seen all I can say is I'm sorry that's happening to you. I know how you feel bud, don't forget you've seen that I've been personally attacked on here several times for trying to do the right thing. Remember on "Sparks Fly"? No user on here deserves those personal attacks, no one. I hope the situation gets better, I'm here for you bud. JamesAlan1986 *talk 13:25, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
If Jivesh doesnt want to speak, then forget him. You can't help it if someone is behaving like a child. And that foul user was banned for attacking and trying to defame me, Should have known better. — Legolas (talk2me) 19:54, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No problem bud, And you are right about what you said. How's school going? Oh, check this. It just got announced today. JamesAlan1986 *talk 19:55, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well, let's see...

[edit]

This is the ONLY place I will be commenting on this situation. Involved users, and any users who may wish to put their two cents in, please comment here, and here only.

Where do I even begin? I read your message; thinking it was genuine, to only come across a conversation happening behind my back between two users (one of which I don't recall ever speaking to before), and a user suggesting you leave me some WikiLove. Now, how does that now equal butterflies and rainbows? What the hell did I even do to you? (This is to the both of you, but I definitely more upset with you Jivesh, due to the fact that I've actually spoken with you in the past). I can show you over 15 times you were rude to users here; when was I? All I told you is that you need a reliable source to confirm the release was cancelled. That's it. But then you went on and tried to build an army of people to support you (Yes, I saw the messages you sent users to "confirm" the release was cancelled). I may not know which damn hand Beyonce writes with, but what does that have to do with whether a song was sent to radio or not? It doesn't. And on the matter of the Discography (if you're gonna bring that up) soundtrack singles ARE singles, and you were later told that. As for whatever happened before between us, again, I do not remember any of it for the life of me.

And Theuho, it would probably be in your best interest to care; surely since I haven't had a single conversation with you before. So tell me how I am a "useless ass user" that is also "wiki-tarded"? How ya wanna sugar coat this? Was I wrong? Was I wrong to revert obvious Beyonce STANS (now, don't you lie to yourselves; check your talk pages) trying to remove a song as a single due to speculation that the release was cancelled? You should both know better than this. Wikipedia runs on rules, and you both broke them numerous times during this whole situation. Which rule(s) did I break?

If either of you had a problem with me; every user has a talk page for a reason. You leave messages for a user about their edits. But surely you wouldn't have said any of this directly to me, would you have? And, if you didn't know, Wikipedia is open for everybody to see, so if you thought I wouldn't see both of you bashing me, you were mistaken. What have I ever said about either of you? Tell me that. — Statustalk contribs  10:44, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

All those things you saw were posted at least two days before. I did not remove then as that would have been ridiculous. Something like that would have proved that i was just toying with you. However, i can swear on all the love i have for Beyonce that this time, i was genuine. But if you will not believe me, i cannot do anything. At least, i will have the satisfaction that i tried to do something to give way to a better relationship between me and you. One last thing, human beings err many times in life. If not, they are simply not human beings. Adopting such an attitude will bring you nowhere (I am especially making reference to life outside Wikipedia). You should learn to forgive. And i request you to please go on "Party" talk page again and see how many times i tried to explain you politely before you just really pissed me off. That's why i just got angry. ★Jivesh 1205★ (talk / ♫♫Give 4 a try!!!♫♫) 10:57, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Again — I will repeat — all I was trying to tell you was that you need a reliable source. You didn't give that. And then you were persistent to remove it on the talk page, kept removing it, and then I just gave up. Is that really how you want to handle things here? Annoying users until they give up with you? I may have acted pissed in the article, but show me where I talked shit about as an editor? Oh, that's right; I didn't. Just because your upset with me reverting your edits, doesn't mean you can go to Theuho and talk about me. You even talked about me right on the talk page of "Party", and you were warned about it. I don't appreciate you removing the message. I should be getting ready for school right now, but I'm preoccupied here. I want to further talk about this, and if I come back from school today to see it removed again, I will just be reporting this to administration. You wanted a reply, and I want to keep talking further about this in a civil manner. — Statustalk contribs  11:13, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
What on earth is this you went on and tried to build an army of people to support you? As far as i see, everyone was against me on that talk-page. And what you gave up? Everything is on the talk-page now. Remember when i last reverted the edit, i told you There is a limit to everything. You are simply being silly now. Everything is there. Read it. Please do not make up things. You are talking as if you had been right all that time and then you decided to back down and i won. Please do not start another drama. ★Jivesh 1205★ (talk / ♫♫Give 4 a try!!!♫♫) 11:17, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
As it says in the brackets, I saw you asking IP users to "confirm" the release was cancelled. When did I make up things? When have I mentioned edit summaries? I don't even look at those. I'm not starting drama. I am simply confronting the situation. What would you like me to do? Leave it alone? You both obviously didn't. The discussion started in late August, and the bashing was on the 17th of September. I backed out, and a few days later "Love on Top" was also pulled from radio. A discussion about whether a song is a single or not does not result in "winning", and I never took it as such. You shouldn't either. Wikipedia is a collaborative effort. I really have to get ready to go now. I will be back at approximately 18:00 Wikipedia time. I don't want to start anything up with you, I just want to have a civil conversation — with both of you. — Statustalk contribs  11:31, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I did not force them to say yes. And did they comment on the talk-page of "Party"? You are making things up when you wrote: You didn't give that. And then you were persistent to remove it on the talk page, kept removing it, and then I just gave up. If you are really gave up, you wouldn't have reverted the song to a single after i had presented everything correctly on the talk-page. That was why i wrote this: There is a limit to everything. You are simply being silly now. Everything is there. Read it. And now you are telling me something else. For heaven sake, let's stop this because you simply won't agree and you are mixing up things. ENOUGH IS ENOUGH. And this is my talk-page, if i want to remove something, i can. ★Jivesh 1205★ (talk / ♫♫Give 4 a try!!!♫♫) 11:39, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Two cents: On the comment, "I saw you asking IP users to "confirm" the release was cancelled." I also saw that happening. | helpdןǝɥ | 12:08, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Exactly, i asked them to confirm. ★Jivesh 1205★ (talk / ♫♫Give 4 a try!!!♫♫) 12:12, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I am telling you both very nicely. From today do not even talk to me here and anywhere else. Take this anyway you want. I apologized and i cannot do anything more. This is the unluckiest day i have had so far in 2011 and this day is irreplaceable. ★Jivesh 1205★ (talk / ♫♫Give 4 a try!!!♫♫) 17:23, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hmmm, i think i better clarify this. I actually wanted to continue this discussion after you return from school. But when you were not here, a lot happened. I lost a friend forever and indirectly it is related to you. And i have no idea how to contact him. It pains a lot to lose someone dear to you. No one knows this better than me., I have lost many of my dear ones in real life. Simply too many!!! And this repeats here. ★Jivesh 1205★ (talk / ♫♫Give 4 a try!!!♫♫) 20:02, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
And i do not want anyone to write somewhere that i am behaving like a child. I am simply fed up of seeing this being written on Wikipedia. ★Jivesh 1205★ (talk / ♫♫Give 4 a try!!!♫♫) 20:03, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Opinion

[edit]

Can I get your opinion on this? I think I made a decent argument about making compromises on here when it comes to the whole "common name" argument. But it doesn't hurt to have a second and third opinion. Please read it thoroughly and take into consideration what I am saying before throwing a big opposition. LOL! JamesAlan1986 *talk 11:25, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for fixing that I don't know how to do the long dash lol! JamesAlan1986 *talk 20:25, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cool! Congratulations! That's awesome man! Doing better actually. Things are starting to look up for me over here. And I'm excited about the album too. Can't wait to see what's gonna be on the CD. For now they've only released information about the DVD and since it's from the North American leg (am I saying that right?) of Speak Now World Tour so I based the track listing closely on what was posted on the site and the tour set. JamesAlan1986 *talk 20:49, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

When you get a chance can I get your opinion on this? JamesAlan1986 *talk 21:00, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

QuasyBoy suggested we post about the live album on the page but I suggested we wait on a consensus on that. JamesAlan1986 *talk 21:19, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Most Wanted

[edit]

No lol. I haven't forgotten. Just adding the final ingredients to Toni Braxton discography, then it's off to FLC. I'll then start Most Wanted :D Did you hear Demi's new album? I love many songs like "Fix a Heart", "Together" and "Who's That Boy" :) Novice7 (talk) 11:36, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ringer

[edit]

Could you help me find a way to keep the Ringer Pilot plot summary short but more accurate than the present one? Events are out of order or presented later because they were skipped and now needed to explain something else's significance, some of them are incorrect (such as Bridget telling Henry about the phone call from the doctor when they meet. She didn't get the call til after she saw Henry and it's implied that Andrew told Henry and Gemma). Overall it's just kinda awkward, but I get way too wordy...

Thanks 35.32.227.74 (talk) 12:51, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You are doing it again

[edit]

Here. Sigh! Explain yourself. Nymf hideliho! 06:28, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I swear to god it's like I don't even notice. My mistake, again. I've reverted back and just restored the filmography section. Best, — Status {talkcontribs  10:25, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It's all good. Cheers for restoring the edits. Nymf hideliho! 15:28, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you can check how I posted about the live album in the Release and promotion section and if you can edit it to make it more Wikipedia like that'd be be great. Unless you think what I have is fine. JamesAlan1986 *talk 10:49, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

K I'll try my best. :) Oh she's got an advertisement for Wonderstruck. JamesAlan1986 *talk 11:00, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
OMG! That looks amazing! JamesAlan1986 *talk 04:34, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Track listing for DVD/Bluray on Speak Now World Tour – Live

[edit]

Technically it was announced on there as it says on the announcement that

"The DVD / Blu-ray will give fans the complete Taylor Swift Speak Now concert experience, showcasing performances of all 17 songs from Taylor’s Speak Now show (“Sparks Fly,” “Mine,” “Story of Us,” “Our Song,” “Mean,” Back To December,” “Better Than Revenge,” “Speak Now,” “Fearless,” “Last Kiss,” “You Belong With Me,” “Dear John,” Enchanted,” “Haunted, “Long Live,” “Fifteen,” and “Love Story”), plus additional bonus content. The CD will contain over 75 minutes of music, including live versions of favorites from the Speak Now album."

That's why I posted the track listing as I had. LOL! JamesAlan1986 *talk 13:09, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

[edit]

Message for you on my talk page :) I don't know if I am on your watchlist? I should be lol. Pancake (talk) 16:02, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"Ringer"

[edit]

"over the hour" isn't needed because that's an obvious statement. I will however remove my addition of "series premiere" as it's also not needed. Jayy008 (talk) 19:41, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've changed some other things as well. I've moved the women numbers before the 18-49 as The CW claims to target that, any objections? About the GA thing, that's annoying me, it's the same user. The user didn't listen until I left an... "this is your only warning" template on their page. I didn't even know that you added it yourself, I thought the green dot automatically appeared. My bad! I will be happy to help. It's good enough for GA now, but I would personally like some more casting and production information before I nominate it. I really enjoy the show, I just think The CW should give it a better timeslot, SMG has fans, but she's not enough to hold that time slot - Nothing works there apart from "One Tree Hill". Jayy008 (talk) 19:51, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
That's great. I won't be doing any this particular evening — I'm Wikipedia'd out — But I will add some production information tomorrow. Maybe elaborate a bit more on the network move, and ABC pulling out. Jayy008 (talk) 19:56, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think "90210" and "Gossip Girl" should ever be paired again because they went awfully together, despite being similar. I wanted "Ringer" leading into "Nikita" on Thursday's and TVD moved. A new president this year, he should have been a little more of a risk taker. 90210 with "Ringer" is a mistake a costly one, so far. I'm happy it's on The CW, personally, as I love The CW. I don't think they'll cancel it or move it. I follow the network very closely and it will definitely come back as it's still doing good for that timeslot, best since 07, I believe. Jayy008 (talk) 19:59, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

October 2011 Wikification drive

[edit]

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Wikify at 16:37, 25 September 2011 (UTC). Redirected here from User talk:Ending-start.[reply]

Hey

[edit]

Yeah sure. Sorry I was kind off busy with the "Rehab" article. I'm not sure I understand the comments. I have to go now, but I will be back in two hours and try to understand and help with it. Ok?! — Tomica1111Question Existing? 20:20, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reading JohnfromPickney's comments and still I CAN NOT UNDERSTAND his points ... not idea what should I do :/ ! — Tomica1111Question Existing? 22:12, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 26 September 2011

[edit]


Thank you for fixing that I got so caught up in fixing it and finding references and everything else and getting as much information as I could find added I was rushing through it really fast to get it fixed. The album was originally released in 2001 but it's a 2002 album as the 2001 release was disowned by Rimes and then discontinued. The 2002 is the official release so I had to fix it so it all matched to that and BOY was it a LOT of work! LOL! JamesAlan1986 *talk 02:28, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

LOL! Great minds think a like I was gonna ask if you thought it was a compilation album as under the circumstances of the albums condition. LOL! JamesAlan1986 *talk 02:35, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You can reply on my talk page if you want. JamesAlan1986 *talk 02:47, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey if you get a chance can you edit what I've posted on there? I've been working my butt off on it and I'm trying to get it as a GA but I don't know what more to do. JamesAlan1986 *talk 21:11, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for going through and fixing some of it. It's been a real pain to do. And sorry I didn't get to answer you sooner, the day just caught me and I've had a lot to deal with. My friend called me today and I found out a horrifying situation that I'm literally scared of. Someone's hacking his accounts and trying to frame me by changing his passwords and putting my e-mail address as a secondary to it. So I'm keeping a low profile right now till situations get straightened out cause another incident prior to my friend calling me was brought to my attention by my mother so yeah. JamesAlan1986 *talk 04:08, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oh and about what you were saying regarding the album not much can be done with it. There's hardly any reviews left about it and at the times Rimes was suing both her record label and her father and so the album was thrown together without her knowledge and released. She didn't know about it till after it was released that it even existed which is why she disowned it and it would later get discontinued. It wasn't hers. The 2002 release is though cause it's the only one you can find in stores like Wal-Mart, etc (I'm not including used stores as I've found the album used several times). The 2001 is not official but the 2002 is under the circumstances of the album's history. The only reason I didn't put about the lawsuits going on at the time was because it was posted as harsh so I removed it though I have references for all of it. JamesAlan1986 *talk 04:17, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey buddy. I hope you're not angry that I'm not fixing MW. Well, I've started (I wanna first do a clean draft in my sandbox. I'll paste it to your sandbox later.) Hope it's okay :) Novice7 (talk) 11:09, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It should be done by tomorrow :) Novice7 (talk) 04:14, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

English Wikipedia Internal Account Creation Interface

[edit]

I have requested an account. :) — Status {talkcontribs  22:54, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Archives

[edit]

any particular reason you want all your talk page archives deleted? DGG ( talk ) 00:13, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

yes , it listed them all; you need to edit them and remove the link from them. I'm doing the 2010s. Please do the others. If any get accidentally deleted, let me know & I'll restore them. I did delete the main 2010 p. & 2011 ps. , as they are non-functional without the header.
Not sure about User:Status/Junkyard, & User:Status/UBX I'm deleting the first, since it is empty, and leaving the 2nd. DGG ( talk ) 00:25, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re: That me?

[edit]

I'm not "Mathiassandell", in case you're implying it. It's quite funny because i've got my own account so i don't need another one.Chronisgr (talk) 10:09, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I know, i thought it was a single from the Christmas album but then i read that:

" While "The Christmas Song" was recorded during her debut album sessions, all of the other songs from My Kind of Christmas were recorded while Aguilera was on tour in mid-late 2000 "

Christmas Time is supposed to be the album's only (radio) single.

As far as the duet with Ricky Martin and Car Wash are concerned, you're right.Chronisgr (talk) 10:34, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WP:FILM September 2011 Newsletter

[edit]

The September 2011 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. —Erik (talk | contribs) 16:39, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, as you was involved with the GAR, you have to decide on the GAR page whether or not you think the article should be kept or demoted. Thanks. Calvin NaNaNaC'mon! 23:49, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 DoneStatus {talkcontribs  00:23, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. Calvin NaNaNaC'mon! 11:07, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]