Jump to content

User talk:Sethant/Archive:2012-Winter

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Nomination of The Face of the Enemy (Babylon 5) for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Face of the Enemy (Babylon 5) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Face of the Enemy (Babylon 5) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. LogicalFinance33 (talk) 00:23, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:NCG-WilliamMiller.jpg

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:NCG-WilliamMiller.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 07:46, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:NCG-LockeCraig.jpg

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:NCG-LockeCraig.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 07:58, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:NCG-WilliamKitchin.jpg

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:NCG-WilliamKitchin.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 07:58, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:NCG-WilliamHawkins.jpg

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:NCG-WilliamHawkins.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 07:58, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:NCG-WarrenWinslow.jpg

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:NCG-WarrenWinslow.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 07:58, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:NCG-TodCaldwell.jpg

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:NCG-TodCaldwell.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 07:58, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:NCG-ThomasBickett.jpg

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:NCG-ThomasBickett.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 07:59, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:NCG-RobertGlenn.jpg

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:NCG-RobertGlenn.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 07:59, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:NCG-JonathanWorth.jpg

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:NCG-JonathanWorth.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 07:59, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:NCG-JohnOwen.jpg

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:NCG-JohnOwen.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 07:59, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:NCG-JohnMorehead.jpg

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:NCG-JohnMorehead.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 07:59, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:NCG-JohnEllis.jpg

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:NCG-JohnEllis.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 07:59, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:NCG-JamesTurner.jpg

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:NCG-JamesTurner.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 07:59, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:NCG-JamesIredell.jpg

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:NCG-JamesIredell.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 07:59, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:NCG-HutchinsBurton.jpg

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:NCG-HutchinsBurton.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 07:59, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:NCG-HenryClark.jpg

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:NCG-HenryClark.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 07:59, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:NCG-EliasCarr.jpg

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:NCG-EliasCarr.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 07:59, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:NCG-EdwardDudley.jpg

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:NCG-EdwardDudley.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 08:00, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:NCG-DavidReid.jpg

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:NCG-DavidReid.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 08:00, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:NCG-CurtisBrogden.jpg

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:NCG-CurtisBrogden.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 08:00, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:NCG-CharlesManly.jpg

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:NCG-CharlesManly.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 08:00, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:NCG-BenjaminSmith.jpg

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:NCG-BenjaminSmith.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 08:00, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Chris Cole (politician) for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chris Cole (politician) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Cole (politician) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. —Tom Morris (talk) 13:59, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Southwestern Commission has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Stub article that is a child of a larger article (North Carolina Councils of Governments) and which has not had a substantive edit in over four years. What information isn't contained there (such as the headquarters) could easily be added and sources transferred, but there's no need for a separate page.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tyrenon (talk) 07:07, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Land-of-Sky Regional Council has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Stub article that is a child of a larger article (North Carolina Councils of Governments) and which has not had a substantive edit in over four years. What information isn't contained there (such as the headquarters) could easily be added and sources transferred, but there's no need for a separate page.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tyrenon (talk) 07:08, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Isothermal Planning and Development Commission has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Stub article that is a child of a larger article (North Carolina Councils of Governments) and which has not had a substantive edit in over four years. What information isn't contained there (such as the headquarters) could easily be added and sources transferred, but there's no need for a separate page.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tyrenon (talk) 07:08, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article High Country Council of Governments has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Stub article that is a child of a larger article (North Carolina Councils of Governments) and which has not had a substantive edit in over four years. What information isn't contained there (such as the headquarters) could easily be added and sources transferred, but there's no need for a separate page.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tyrenon (talk) 07:09, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Western Piedmont Council of Governments has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Stub article that is a child of a larger article (North Carolina Councils of Governments) and which has not had a substantive edit in over four years. What information isn't contained there (such as the headquarters) could easily be added and sources transferred, but there's no need for a separate page.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tyrenon (talk) 07:18, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Centralina Council of Governments has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Stub article that is a child of a larger article (North Carolina Councils of Governments) and which has not had a substantive edit in over four years. What information isn't contained there (such as the headquarters) could easily be added and sources transferred, but there's no need for a separate page.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tyrenon (talk) 07:18, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Piedmont Triad Council of Governments has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Stub article that is a child of a larger article (North Carolina Councils of Governments) and which has not had a substantive edit in over four years. What information isn't contained there (such as the headquarters) could easily be added and sources transferred, but there's no need for a separate page.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tyrenon (talk) 07:19, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Northwest Piedmont Council of Governments has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Stub article that is a child of a larger article (North Carolina Councils of Governments) and which has not had a substantive edit in over four years. What information isn't contained there (such as the headquarters) could easily be added and sources transferred, but there's no need for a separate page.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tyrenon (talk) 07:19, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Kerr-Tar Regional Council of Governments has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Stub article that is a child of a larger article (North Carolina Councils of Governments) and which has not had a substantive edit in over four years. What information isn't contained there (such as the headquarters) could easily be added and sources transferred, but there's no need for a separate page.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tyrenon (talk) 07:20, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Upper Coastal Plain Council of Governments has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Stub article that is a child of a larger article (North Carolina Councils of Governments) and which has not had a substantive edit in over four years. What information isn't contained there (such as the headquarters) could easily be added and sources transferred, but there's no need for a separate page.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tyrenon (talk) 07:21, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Mid-Carolina Council of Governments has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Stub article that is a child of a larger article (North Carolina Councils of Governments) and which has not had a substantive edit in over four years. What information isn't contained there (such as the headquarters) could easily be added and sources transferred, but there's no need for a separate page.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tyrenon (talk) 07:22, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Lumber River Council of Governments has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Stub article that is a child of a larger article (North Carolina Councils of Governments) and which has not had a substantive edit in over four years. What information isn't contained there (such as the headquarters) could easily be added and sources transferred, but there's no need for a separate page.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tyrenon (talk) 07:22, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Cape Fear Council of Governments has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Stub article that is a child of a larger article (North Carolina Councils of Governments) and which has not had a substantive edit in over four years. What information isn't contained there (such as the headquarters) could easily be added and sources transferred, but there's no need for a separate page.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tyrenon (talk) 07:23, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Eastern Carolina Council of Governments has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Stub article that is a child of a larger article (North Carolina Councils of Governments) and which has not had a substantive edit in over four years. What information isn't contained there (such as the headquarters) could easily be added and sources transferred, but there's no need for a separate page.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tyrenon (talk) 07:26, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Mid-East Commission has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Stub article that is a child of a larger article (North Carolina Councils of Governments) and which has not had a substantive edit in over four years. What information isn't contained there (such as the headquarters) could easily be added and sources transferred, but there's no need for a separate page.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tyrenon (talk) 07:27, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Albemarle Commission has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Stub article that is a child of a larger article (North Carolina Councils of Governments) and which has not had a substantive edit in over four years. What information isn't contained there (such as the headquarters) could easily be added and sources transferred, but there's no need for a separate page. It was tagged for a shortage of sources in 2009 and has seen no improvement since then.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tyrenon (talk) 07:28, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Map for Williamsburg, VA

[edit]

Hey, I noticed that you were the one who uploaded the map of Virginia showing Williamsburg's location. Unfortunately, the highlighted political entity seems to be York county other than Williamsburg. Could you fix this? Thanks! Hiyayaywhopee (talk) 17:21, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Adminship Anniversary

[edit]