User talk:SayfKhan807

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello SayfKhan807! Your additions to Orient Islamic School have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's eligibility.
Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Tymon.r Any questions? 22:32, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Orient Islamic School, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Please be aware that re-adding unsourced material after it has been deleted is against WP policy. Please see WP:BURDEN.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:44, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain pages (Orient Islamic School) for conflict of interest editing.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Izno (talk) 00:29, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SayfKhan807 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Good Day Administrators. I request to be unblocked as i have made stupid errors and have not understood wikipedia's rules and orders. I have now read over wikipedia's rules and have now learnt how to edit. Please unblock me from editing this page and other pages. Thank you for your time and consideration

Decline reason:

You are only blocked from one page, and are free to edit the article talk page. If you build up a track record of constructive talk page posts to the school's talk page, your block could be undone, but for now it seems premature. PhilKnight (talk) 13:23, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

SayfKhan807 (talk) 00:47, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Which errors? Izno, the socking is CU-confirmed. Drmies (talk) 00:51, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I did not know that socking was not allowed and due to the fact that when I asked Onel5969 for help in rectifying my mistake first time,instead he removed my work and i was left puzzled. I now know that i have made a mistake by socking etc and will not do this in the future

Thank you for your time SayfKhan807 (talk) 00:55, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]