Jump to content

User talk:Rnieders

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Rnieders, you are invited to the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Rnieders! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join other new editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Wikipedia; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! TheOriginalSoni (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:08, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Future Perfect at Sunrise: Fut.Perf. I am not sure if I am responding correctly. I have left a message on the File:GAP cross-border terminal and bridge 2001.jpg, am very new to this and have no clue where to start. As mentioned in the File:GAP cross-border terminal and bridge 2001.jpg, I started the Tijuana cross-border terminal project in 1990, was central in the Mexico-US negotiations, put the project together and created most of the promotional material, but am having problems deciphering the conditions listed to be able to upload the images central in showing how this project took 20 years to put together and how it also changed over time. Any help would be greatly appreciated and hopefully this will reach you. Thank youRnieders (talk) 04:02, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:GAP cross-border terminal and bridge 2001.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:GAP cross-border terminal and bridge 2001.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. 05:51, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:SANDAG bi-national airport proposal 1990.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:SANDAG bi-national airport proposal 1990.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:36, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:San Diego TwinPorts US-Mexico airport proposal 1991.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:San Diego TwinPorts US-Mexico airport proposal 1991.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:36, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Mexicana de Aviacion cross-border terminal proposal 1990.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Mexicana de Aviacion cross-border terminal proposal 1990.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:44, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Casey Development cross-border terminal proposal 1996.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Casey Development cross-border terminal proposal 1996.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:53, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Aero Charter cross-border terminal proposal 1991.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Aero Charter cross-border terminal proposal 1991.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:56, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:ASA Tijuana airport expansion proposal 1992.jpg listed for deletion

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:ASA Tijuana airport expansion proposal 1992.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:38, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pictures in Cross-border terminal article

[edit]

First of all how wonderful that you've take the time to share the history with others. In Wikipedia it will be aceessed by far more people than anyone on Earth. As for the pictures there is really nothing you can do. Unless you own the rights to them yourself there are very few other pictures that are considered in the Public domain, with the major exception of US federal government work. And Open Street Map.

City, state and country works are not in the public domain and neither are those of Mexican government entities. There is an exception for "fair use" but I have only ever seen this applied for an album cover or tv show's logo, as part of an article for a tv program, film etc. Keizers (talk) 08:42, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I still don't know where to reply so I do it the other person's talk page even though you don't have the whole thread is in different places. What you talk about is not fair use. You should add conversations to the bottom of talk pages. Read up on what fair use is in terms of copyright. WP:FU. I know it's frustrating - it really is as restrictive as you think. and it winds up making wikipedia often incomplete by lacking essential images. Keizers (talk) 15:45, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I renamed the article. Good suggestion. As for the pictures if I try to explain another way, I think that pictures that are released in a press kit - the rights are still somehow retained by the owner (I think) - and probably someone else couldn't use them for certain commercial purposes - if they are in Wikipedia the rights have to be explicitly signed away, *entirely*. Btw any idea when the terminal will be finished and usable? We will use it regularly as we live in MEX and are originally from SAN. Keizers (talk) 20:00, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
It has been a while since I last contacted you, I have slowly added information to the Tijuana cross-border article. All the images I added I created and own but now I received a notice that there is a question if I own and created the pictures I uploaded, one file has already been deleted and now all the images have been tagged for deletion, who can I contact? I created this project, was directly involved in every facet of the negotiations, added references so that readers could understand the politics that affected the project supported by newspaper reports and now my images are being questioned? cannot understand this process. Rnieders (talk) 03:45, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Files for deletion

[edit]

See Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2014 September 1#Tijuana Cross-border Terminal. --Stefan2 (talk) 14:45, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talk pages

[edit]

That's great! Congratulations on all your contributions. This is such a great way to increase knowledge amongst by far the most number of readers, compared to any other way such as a blog. A small tip, when writing on a Talk page, click the New Section tab and make your comment that way. It will create a new section at the bottom of a user's talk page. Or you can add text to an existing section on their page e.g. I already have a section talking about Tijuana Cross-border Terminal. Cheers! Keizers (talk) 19:05, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Cross-border Terminal, Tijuana International Airport

[edit]

Hello! Your submission of Cross-border Terminal, Tijuana International Airport at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! LookingYourBest (talk) 12:44, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Tijuana Cross-border Terminal

[edit]

HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:04, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Still do not know how to reply to messages, is it above or below the edit line?? I still have quite a few files on the Tijuana cross-border terminal, spent 18 years working on it from the inside, will add information on the land acquisition and keep it as short as possible. Thank you for the grammar correction, have always had problem with it. all the best 108.202.3.119 (talk) 04:10, 5 November 2014 (UTC) Forgot to log in before writing Rnieders (talk) 04:12, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tijuana Cross-border Terminal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jerry Sanders. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:58, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Images

[edit]

Hello, Just an idea. You could create a website and upload the images to it. It's easy to create a site with Blogger or Wordpress.com. Then at least they will be online. Keizers (talk) 14:23, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, good to hear from you, I am not too computer savvy and never thought of creating a blog. I will submit to OTRS but they seem to be at least 20 days backlogged. Since there are enough references to establish who Ralph Nieders is, the claim now is that I must prove that rnieders and Ralph Nieders are the same person and not someone impersonating and uploading images in his name. This has been quite an exercise in patience, do all Wikipedia articles go through this process?? Hope you have a Merry Christmas and that next year is a better one, all the best Rnieders (talk) 17:00, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

[edit]
Hello, Rnieders. You have new messages at Stefan2's talk page.
Message added 16:28, 12 March 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Stefan2 (talk) 16:28, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tijuana Cross-border Terminal, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Transamerica, James Harvey and John Beckett. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tijuana Cross-border Terminal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BAA. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cross Border Xpress, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Susan Davis. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the check, I removed the link as it looks odd placing "Susan Davis (politician)" left it as Congresswoman Susan Davis, forgot to sign-in when I did the edit. Again, thank you for catching the error. ~
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cross Border Xpress, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page UPS. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Rnieders. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Flight crew usage of Cross Border Xpress

[edit]

I added this verbiage:

"Flight crew that want to use the facility must hold a boarding pass and pay the fee alike."

Can you please confirm? Thank you. --2601:646:4200:F86:153:FC6B:83EE:9B0D (talk) 15:34, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What you previously wrote was good information. Though I started the project and carried for 20 years, after the land deal closed, I was no longer involved and have not used the crossing. Enrique Valle is in charge of the crossing, the business card he gave me, the telephone never seemed to work, but may be it works now (619) 299-9976, have no email for him. Sorry I could not help you, but I liked what you added. Rnieders (talk)
Great, thank you. I enjoyed reading your content. It is very rich in detail and it shows the perseverance that you and others had to see this project to fruition. --2601:646:4200:F86:153:FC6B:83EE:9B0D (talk) 16:25, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, do you know who changed the format of the article?? The section titles? Rnieders (talk)
I added a section header so that it could show each decade (late 1980s, 1990s, 2000s, 2010s), for readability. I left all of your subsection titles in tact. The only difference is they are indented. If you want me to take out the titles by decade, I am happy to do so. Let me know. Thanks. --2601:646:4200:F86:153:FC6B:83EE:9B0D (talk) 16:42, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
do you have cross-referencing wiki-links that depend on sections being numbered as you had them previously? --2601:646:4200:F86:153:FC6B:83EE:9B0D (talk) 16:48, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
No, there are cross-references, was wondering if you would mind if I or you could change the section titles a little e.g. first section "Early development, competing proposals and setbacks- 1988-2000, second section "Planning and land acquisition- 2000-2008" and last section "Government negotiations, construction and opening- 2009-2016" Also would like to add your Airways Magazine article as a footnote, I have all the info for that. this message is basically a repletion, may have sent it to the wrong address. Thank you for your patience.Rnieders (talk) 17:05, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I had Keizers look at the changes, he created the Cross Border Xpress page and I have been working with him since 2014 when he first created a section on the terminal under the Tijuana Airport wiki page and later this article. He suggested going back to the original format. The history and politics on this project were difficult to say the least and I worked directly with Ernest Velasco Leon the Director of ASA during and after the airport privatization process.Rnieders (talk) 06:33, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Rnieders. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited History of the Cross Border Xpress, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page UABC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the notice, I have corrected the problem.Rnieders (talk) 16:34, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Rnieders. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest

[edit]

Following our conversation at #wikipedia-en-help connect, please note the following advice:

Nomination of Ralph Nieders for deletion

[edit]

Hi Ralph, following appeared on my Wikipedia talk page and am sharing with you in case you would like to chip in at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ralph Nieders:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ralph Nieders is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ralph Nieders until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

-- Keizers (talk) 14:19, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]