Jump to content

User talk:Ph03n1x77

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lexi Walker (November 8)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chenzw was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Chenzw  Talk  09:54, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello! Ph03n1x77, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Chenzw  Talk  09:54, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Lexi Walker

[edit]

Hello, Ph03n1x77. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Lexi Walker".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 18:57, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eamon Farren (June 13)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gbawden was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Gbawden (talk) 12:09, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eamon Farren (July 3)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DrStrauss was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
DrStrauss talk 09:07, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New Article Submission On Your Topic

[edit]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Genniferwithag01/sandbox#Eamon_Farren Hello, See link. I had written my own page for this topic but someone else had beat me to it, so I submitted it for review separately. You were the last editor to look at this topic. Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks! GGenniferwithag01 (talk) 03:41, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semyonov's Rebellion moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Semyonov's Rebellion, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 20:58, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Semyonov's Rebellion (August 17)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by JavaHurricane was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
JavaHurricane 04:39, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Semyonov's Rebellion has been accepted

[edit]
Semyonov's Rebellion, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 10:36, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Ph03n1x77! Thank you for your contributions to articles related to free and open-source software. I'd like to invite you to become a part of the free and open-source software task force, a project aimed at improving the quality of articles about free and open-source software on Wikipedia.

If you would like to participate, please visit the free and open-source software task force for more information. Feel free to sign your name under "Participants". Thanks! — Newslinger talk 05:46, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Newslinger thanks for the invite! I'm happy to join up. Ph03n1x77 (talk) 16:56, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

[edit]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Grigory Mikhaylovich Semyonov into Semyonov's Rebellion. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 20:35, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Diannaa Thanks for bringing that to my attention, I incorrectly assumed that since it was all internal to Wikipedia it didn't require attribution. I appreciate the correction! Ph03n1x77 (talk) 04:45, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of PAN Foundation for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article PAN Foundation is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAN Foundation until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Viia o Lanti (talk) 10:37, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Curbon7 were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Curbon7 (talk) 02:41, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, Ph03n1x77. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of Largest US Charities by Private Donations, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:29, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ph03n1x77. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "List of Largest US Charities by Private Donations".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 13:39, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]