User talk:Patate324

This is Patate324's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Passion Flakie

I reverted your edits to Passion Flakie because the subject is not notable. Chris Troutman (talk) 15:16, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Chris troutman Why is the topic of passion flakies not notable when several other cakes from the same company Vachon Bakery have their own page? e.g. May West, Jos. Louis

Patate324 (talk) 18:11, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS is not a reasonable argument. WP:GNG is the defining criterion. The Jos Louis might pass. The May West probably does not. Chris Troutman (talk) 18:14, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Chris troutman Thanks for taking the time to answer. I did not know this. Cheers. Patate324 (talk) 16:02, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Rideau Transit Group Logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Rideau Transit Group Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Min☠︎rax^«¦talk¦» 03:36, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rideau Transit Group (October 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

References are mainly general announcements and brief mentions, falling short of WP:ORGCRIT. This also needs cleaned up for tone as things such as an entire section for key people is unencyclopedic and is promotional.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rideau Transit Group and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CNMall41 (talk) 20:29, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Patate324! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CNMall41 (talk) 20:29, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]