User talk:NgHanoi
April 2024
[edit]
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. MrOllie (talk) 18:55, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- @MrOllie, I'm wondering if you actually read the source instead of automatically undoing my edition? NgHanoi (talk) 18:57, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Immaterial. You've attempted the edit multiple times and been reverted, the onus is on you to gather support at the article's talk page. MrOllie (talk) 19:18, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- I did say the source is incorrectly cited and this is out of carefully reading the source. So Wikipedia's policy for incorrect citation is by gathering support from article's talk page instead of verifying the correctness of the source? Anyway, I did your suggestion of leaving comment on the Talk page but I'm under an impression that a biased group of editors is trying to overrun the page. NgHanoi (talk) 19:38, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Immaterial. You've attempted the edit multiple times and been reverted, the onus is on you to gather support at the article's talk page. MrOllie (talk) 19:18, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Welcome!
[edit]Hi NgHanoi! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! Polygnotus (talk) 16:36, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
Links
[edit]
When adding links to material on external sites, please ensure that the external site is not violating the creator's copyright. Linking to websites that display copyrighted works is acceptable as long as the website's operator has created or licensed the work. Knowingly directing others to a site that violates copyright may be considered contributory infringement. This is particularly relevant when linking to sites such as YouTube or Sci-Hub, where due care should be taken to avoid linking to material that violates its creator's copyright. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Bon courage (talk) 07:42, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Hi @Bon courage, I have no idea the guy behind the link is licensed to display that material or not. I'm just google the title and it pops out. I did mention in the post that I don't know if it's appropriate or not. If you think its in fact a violate of the Wikipedia's policy, I'm happy to take it out, but again, I'm not associated with the link. NgHanoi (talk) 10:38, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Indeed. If you "have no idea the guy behind the link is licensed to display that material or not" it is better to err on the side of caution. Bon courage (talk) 11:16, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks, I'm new to Wikipedia editing by the way, so a lot of mistakes can be made... I'm open to know about the mistakes that I can make. NgHanoi (talk) 11:24, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Indeed. If you "have no idea the guy behind the link is licensed to display that material or not" it is better to err on the side of caution. Bon courage (talk) 11:16, 26 September 2024 (UTC)