Jump to content

User talk:Madelinecj

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Prospect Park Books (October 14)

[edit]
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.


Teahouse logo
Hello! Madelinecj, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Your submission at Articles for creation: Draft:Prospect Park Books (August 8)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. Sionk (talk) 01:35, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Madelinecj, I think you're slightly misunderstanding Wikipedia's concept of notability. Though you have cited many third party sources, almost all of them are about books that have been published by Prospect Park Books, rather than about the company. Unfortunately if one or more of a company's products are 'notable', it doesn't follow that the company is too.
Obviously, the Publishers Weekly article is very good and substantial about Prospect Park Books. Is there any more similar coverage? Sionk (talk) 10:21, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]