Jump to content

User talk:Madeforall1/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 04:16, 23 August 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: DJ Kelblizz has been accepted

DJ Kelblizz, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

dxneo (talk) 07:34, 26 July 2024 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:Nigerian gospel music awards indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. plicit 13:28, 26 July 2024 (UTC)

Shallipopi - 2024

@Madeforall1: Please do not revert any edit made on Shallipopi again. Any more revert would be considered as page vandalism. Thank You. 2RDD (talk) 11:06, 28 July 2024 (UTC)

Who changed edited his category as “Musician from Benin” ? Madeforall1 (talk) 11:08, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
@Madeforall1: You made a nice edit there. But do not revert others.. 2RDD (talk) 11:16, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
The edits are too similar bruh @2RDD, but best regards. Madeforall1 (talk) 11:20, 28 July 2024 (UTC)

AFDs

Hello, Madeforall1,

You are free to participate in AFD like any editor is. But please take them seriously. Your personal opinion of a subject is not relevant, what's important is to provide policy-based argument and a careful analysis of sources, both those in the article and those brought up in an AFD discussion. You are still gaining experience as an editor and participating in AFDs takes a thorough knowledge of policies and standards of notability so new editors are advised to wait before diving in to these discussions but please do not let another editor intimidate you into removing your comments from a discussion once they are made. You can strike them if you wish but just be careful and put thought into them before offering your assessment of an article and what should happen with it. If you have questions, there is always Teahouse|the Teahouse. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 01:20, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

Thank you so much @Liz, some editors make me feel like I’m not welcomed but I’ll still try, I know I’m doing my best on Wikipedia and I give good contributions. Madeforall1 (talk) 05:20, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Madeforall1, I'm so disappointed that you are socking. You were a promising editor. Liz Read! Talk! 23:37, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
I saw the block days ago and I was surprised but never had the time to say a word. Couldn't believe I was speaking for a sock account here Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kingdom Achievers Award due to the attack. Anyways, now apologies goes @CfA, I hope you have a nice day. cheers. Gabriel (……?) 00:08, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
@Liz this is @Madeforall1, Please help me, Maybe it’s an IP match or maybe someone close to me but certainly not me, all this was 5 years ago and I’m a changed person, yes I have used my colleagues phone to edit on wiki some years ago but not anymore, this is my real account and I’ve made good contributions to the community checking from my contributions, I’m not directly affiliated with the sock @Wizkizayo, help me beg the check user admin, from my contributions I’m not like that and I’ve tried my best. 105.113.8.155 (talk) 17:44, 30 July 2024 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Wizkizayo per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Wizkizayo. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Spicy (talk) 15:26, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Madeforall1 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Greetings @Spicy, This is @Madeforall1, I’m real and maybe my account has been historically linked with a sock account due to some reasons, I’ve edited on Wikipedia before now and I’m begging that with my account “Madeforall1”, I’ve not abused it or made any wrong edits, all I pled is to be unblocked as my account is locked and I can’t use it to respond on my talk page, but I used same device and my IP address is visual, I bet that I’m disconnected from that sock account as it belongs to a colleague I know years back and I lost his contact, We where a group and we where practicing on begin editors on Wikipedia and maybe it wasn’t a good idea as many accounts where created, I pled to the community to check my contributions very well and understand I have passion for editing, even @Liz could see, help I’m not a sock anymore and @Madeforall1 is the only account I want to use for lifetime contribution to Wikipedia, thank you sir Madeforall1 (talk) 17:53, 30 July 2024 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Moot, as the account is now globally locked. —Ingenuity (t • c) 00:54, 17 August 2024 (UTC)


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This isn't some accidental coincidence from bad luck. One of these sockpuppet accounts was registered the day you were arguing angrily at AFD and was used to votestack for your position. Your explanation that it was just some IP mixup from five years ago is implausible. There's also other significant overlap that is very inconsistent with your explanation. And yes, Liz said that you were a promising editor, but while expressing disappointment in your socking. This very unblock request itself is improper as your account is now globally locked [1]; you no longer have any right to edit on any Wikimedia project, anywhere in the world, on any computer, using any account, for any reason. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 04:40, 10 August 2024 (UTC)