“A prosocial orientation refers to a set of dispositional attitudes, cognitions and behaviours that successfully potentiate social interactions” [1].
Im not sure if having this inverted references is sufficient alone... we should probably add more to this? Or have it go, or reworded? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 388827MGMT (talk • contribs) 00:43, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Just posting some links to some preliminary research. Have a look before the next meeting so you're all experts by then.
http://eds.b.ebscohost.com.ezp.lib.unimelb.edu.au/eds/detail/detail?sid=1306d9ea-ffb7-4969-a21f-162b913022e2%40sessionmgr110&vid=0&hid=126&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWRzLWxpdmUmc2NvcGU9c2l0ZQ%3d%3d#AN=92547700&db=bth
http://eds.b.ebscohost.com.ezp.lib.unimelb.edu.au/eds/detail/detail?sid=8ef009cb-9810-47c8-a5a4-9e6b96e4a0c9%40sessionmgr110&vid=0&hid=126&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWRzLWxpdmUmc2NvcGU9c2l0ZQ%3d%3d#AN=97633812&db=sih
http://eds.b.ebscohost.com.ezp.lib.unimelb.edu.au/eds/detail/detail?sid=b529f694-7700-4be3-894e-ac8ea0f665c8%40sessionmgr198&vid=0&hid=126&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWRzLWxpdmUmc2NvcGU9c2l0ZQ%3d%3d#AN=26058287&db=cmedm
http://eds.b.ebscohost.com.ezp.lib.unimelb.edu.au/eds/detail/detail?sid=9c545d85-4a99-48ef-8617-2ead5c648d6d%40sessionmgr112&vid=0&hid=126&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWRzLWxpdmUmc2NvcGU9c2l0ZQ%3d%3d#AN=edsjsr.41683886&db=edsjsr
http://eds.b.ebscohost.com.ezp.lib.unimelb.edu.au/eds/detail/detail?sid=be33ba4a-bf23-4dcd-8238-a501b9b15f9f%40sessionmgr198&vid=0&hid=126&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWRzLWxpdmUmc2NvcGU9c2l0ZQ%3d%3d#AN=102491399&db=edb
http://eds.b.ebscohost.com.ezp.lib.unimelb.edu.au/eds/detail/detail?sid=19fe5694-7667-4b6b-891d-68faf1a11b5f%40sessionmgr111&vid=0&hid=126&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWRzLWxpdmUmc2NvcGU9c2l0ZQ%3d%3d#AN=65118808&db=sih
http://eds.b.ebscohost.com.ezp.lib.unimelb.edu.au/eds/detail/detail?sid=f628106b-0f67-4ba4-8063-cfff28b2372b%40sessionmgr114&vid=0&hid=126&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWRzLWxpdmUmc2NvcGU9c2l0ZQ%3d%3d#AN=35279012&db=s3h
http://eds.b.ebscohost.com.ezp.lib.unimelb.edu.au/eds/detail/detail?sid=b112a0d3-3ade-467a-ab7b-1149a5b65923%40sessionmgr112&vid=0&hid=126&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWRzLWxpdmUmc2NvcGU9c2l0ZQ%3d%3d#AN=21952723&db=cmedm
http://eds.b.ebscohost.com.ezp.lib.unimelb.edu.au/eds/detail/detail?sid=b224123e-2e9c-41dd-8186-926114a80752%40sessionmgr115&vid=0&hid=126&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWRzLWxpdmUmc2NvcGU9c2l0ZQ%3d%3d#AN=S0167487015000823&db=edselp
http://eds.b.ebscohost.com.ezp.lib.unimelb.edu.au/eds/detail/detail?sid=d9d47f88-10c7-4829-a627-f05b6e91685d%40sessionmgr115&vid=0&hid=126&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWRzLWxpdmUmc2NvcGU9c2l0ZQ%3d%3d#AN=27404369&db=bth
http://eds.b.ebscohost.com.ezp.lib.unimelb.edu.au/eds/detail/detail?sid=f377ab15-af15-4874-a019-e2306d16a0b6%40sessionmgr113&vid=0&hid=126&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWRzLWxpdmUmc2NvcGU9c2l0ZQ%3d%3d#AN=101964026&db=edb
http://eds.b.ebscohost.com.ezp.lib.unimelb.edu.au/eds/detail/detail?sid=1f0cd71a-dd3d-4512-aa27-91c50c763db3%40sessionmgr114&vid=0&hid=126&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWRzLWxpdmUmc2NvcGU9c2l0ZQ%3d%3d#AN=EJ571492&db=eric
http://eds.b.ebscohost.com.ezp.lib.unimelb.edu.au/eds/detail/detail?sid=5b8f39b4-8abc-4570-8ca9-82fd3711ee3b%40sessionmgr111&vid=0&hid=126&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWRzLWxpdmUmc2NvcGU9c2l0ZQ%3d%3d#AN=edsoai.786475819&db=edsoai
http://eds.b.ebscohost.com.ezp.lib.unimelb.edu.au/eds/detail/detail?sid=68930a66-2dfe-4479-9c3b-0e7fbbf022c8%40sessionmgr110&vid=0&hid=126&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWRzLWxpdmUmc2NvcGU9c2l0ZQ%3d%3d#AN=edsswe.oai.services.scigloo.org.33194&db=edsswe
Also, should we make a "measurement" section? Seems like there has been a lot of studies and they use different measurements to define prosocial orientation.
684312MGMT (talk) 12:36, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Good links! I agree that we should have a measurement section. 686044MGMT (talk) 12:41, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. A measurement section would be great, we could find the most effective/common from more credible journals and use them as an example.
541830MGMT (talk) 12:21, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
everyone read this, there are seperate pages on each section https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Good_article_criteria710220MGMT (talk) 06:50, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
hey guys, i updated and added links to the entire outcomes section. I think its done now unless anyone finds some new awesome info.
710220MGMT (talk) 14:55, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hey team I have figured out how to add pictures to the page if anyone wants me to add anything or take something out give me a yell, lachy ¬¬¬¬ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 686044MGMT (talk • contribs) 02:07, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Can we combine Conditions/Moderators with Causes? 537648MGMT (talk) 11:16, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah that's a good idea.
Here a few useful links for our final editing:
Good article critera- https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:GACR#Criteria in case you also couldnt get the original link from the instructions to work
Style manual- https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style
Some good article nominations- https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Good_article_nominations/Instructions
According to the style manual only the first word in the title should be capitalised. Ie- Prosocial orientation.
541830MGMT (talk) 01:53, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
It looks like the sentence "RSA has also been proven to release oxytocin in the body when individuals feel warmth or trust towards those they interact with" should have a reference. Thoughts? 541830MGMT (talk) 04:14, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
