User talk:Lottabug

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:11, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lottabug (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not SEFPRODUCTIONS. I was blocked before CheckUser was used, which I know for sure would have shown my IP to be unrelated, and thus, innocent. The reason I know why is because I am a Scottish fan of Paul Easter/SEFPRODUCTIONS, and I am not him. I think that when he is making accounts to get into Wikipedia he is setting himself up for failure, seeing as Wikipedia frowns very heavily on sockpuppets. I am innocent. I made these pages solely because I am a fan. I do not even type like him. Lottabug (talk) 18:14, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

WP:DUCK sockpuppetry. Additionally, I've salted the pages you are trying to recreate. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 19:26, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.