User talk:LagoonGoose

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

== Welcome! ==

Hi LagoonGoose! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

I've noticed that you've expressed an interest in the Arab–Israeli conflict. Unfortunately, due to a history of conflict and disruptive editing it has been designated a contentious topic and is subject to some strict rules.

The rule that affects you most as a new or IP editor is the prohibition on making any edit related to the Arab–Israel conflict unless you are logged into an account and that account is at least 30 days old and has made at least 500 edits.

This prohibition is broadly construed, so it includes edits such as adding the reaction of a public figure concerning the conflict to their article or noting the position of a company or organization as it relates to the conflict.

The exception to this rule is that you may request a specific change to an article on the talk page of that article or at this page. Please ensure that your requested edit complies with our neutral point of view and reliable sourcing policies, and if the edit is about a living person our policies on biographies of living people as well.

Any edits you make contrary to these rules are likely to be reverted, and repeated violations can lead to you being blocked from editing.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Selfstudier (talk) 20:15, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ARBECR

WP:ARBECR applies to your edits in the above topic area. That means that all you can do is make straightforward edit requests (see WP:EDITXY on article talk pages, that's it.

It's not necessary to use the formal template, but if you do not, make sure that any request is in the form change X to Y and sourced as appropriate. Thank you. Selfstudier (talk) 20:17, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you mean this edit I said why in my edit summary, not an edit request. Selfstudier (talk) 10:17, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Selfstudier, no, I'm asking about the edit request, before that. You deleted my edit request as well?

I want to make another edit request about a different error on that page (one section misquotes or misinterprets the reference given for it), and I want to make sure that doesn't get deleted as well.

In the request you deleted I used the edit request template and I pointed out a bug on the page, I didn't have a "change to" because it looked like a technical glitch and I didn't know how to solve it. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Misinformation_in_the_Israel%E2%80%93Hamas_war&diff=prev&oldid=1224486866

But I don't understand why mine was deleted given what else is still there? The request above it is still there, and it is just vague feedback with no source. And above that there are long opinionated comments there from people who aren't even logged in?

I'm asking because I want to make sure I know how to write an edit request that won't get deleted.

LagoonGoose (talk) 01:35, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe I will just try again, but if you deleted the next edit request, please write something more helpful than "not an edit request", please tell me what I need to do to make it quality as an edit request. LagoonGoose (talk) 01:49, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I wrote WP:ARBECR as well, did you read it? It explains that you are limited to edit requests. And above I have pointed you to WP:EDITXY for doing edit requests, did you read that?

That link you have given above is also not an edit request and why I deleted it. If you are having problems with making an edit request, try the Teahouse for some advice. Selfstudier (talk) 08:36, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Selfstudier can you give an example of how I could re write that linked thing as an edit request? LagoonGoose (talk) 06:38, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Selfstudier, I couldn't offer a suggestion of how to fix the bug because I didn't know how. Is that the problem? Is the lack of suggested solution the only problem that made it "not an edit request"?

I did read the information about edit requests. I thought I understood it. I even tried to explain to the guy above me how he could improve his request. I understand why you deleted my attempt to give him suggestions, if there's a very strict "no other comments" rule that makes sense.

But what I'm confused by is why my bug report doesn't count as an edit request, and so it gets deleted, but his vague suggestion with no source etc. does count as an edit request and it still there? And why all the other stuff that's even less like an edit request I'd still there, from people who are not even logged in. Did the rule change recently?

LagoonGoose (talk) 09:04, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A bug report is not an edit request and has nothing to do with the page you are trying to edit. As I said above, if you are having problems, you can get advice at the Teahouse. Selfstudier (talk) 09:07, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Selfstudier, but you deleted my edit request as well, why? LagoonGoose (talk) 10:13, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of LGBTQ Muslims topic outline

A tag has been placed on LGBTQ Muslims topic outline requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. C F A 💬 02:27, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Outline LGBTQ Muslims

A tag has been placed on Outline LGBTQ Muslims requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. C F A 💬 02:27, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category LGBTQ in the United States

A tag has been placed on Category LGBTQ in the United States requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. C F A 💬 02:27, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@CFA I already moved all of these to draft space, and I think I did that before these messages? LagoonGoose (talk) 02:38, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, these speedy deletions were only for the redirects left behind after you moved the articles to draftspace. When you move an article, a redirect is automatically left behind at the original title. Wikipedia doesn't allow redirects from articlespace to draftspace, so they were deleted. Your drafts are still available at Draft:LGBTQ Muslims topic outline and Draft:Outline LGBTQ in the United States. C F A 💬 02:44, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@CFA Why does it make a redirect when you move things to draft space if it's not supposed to have a redirect? Can I move it without that? LagoonGoose (talk) 03:19, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well, to be honest, I'm not really sure. It would make sense to disable the automatic redirect when moving from article to draftspace. It doesn't work that way, though, and the redirects just have to be deleted immediately afterwards. Administrators and Page movers can move pages without leaving redirects behind, but those rights require a lot of experience to be granted. If you want to move something to draftspace in the future, you can tag the resulting redirect for speedy deletion yourself by adding "{{db-r2}}" to the top of the new redirect page. C F A 💬 03:36, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

thanks, that option at least keeps my talk page tidy? LagoonGoose (talk) 03:42, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, if you add the tag yourself you won't receive any talk page notifications. C F A 💬 03:47, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How do I set up a talk page archive?

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

LagoonGoose (talk) 08:04, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There are several options you can use to archive your talk page and they are listed on here. You can either use a manual method of cut-and-paste or their are ways listed on the page to have one click archiving or letting a bot archive it for you. cyberdog958^Talk 14:39, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Religion and philosophy request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Athena on a "Religion and philosophy" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 11:30, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Armand Duplantis on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 22:30, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Irtapil per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Irtapil. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. RoySmith (talk) 14:40, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]