User talk:Justice1lover

March 2013

Hello, I'm Drmies. An edit that you recently made to Aafia Siddiqui seemed to be a test and it has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 02:21, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I said "test" because I didn't want to say "very unhelpful, not neutral, and not according to Wikipedia guidelines"--"test" in part because I think you may not be fully aware of Wikipedia's guidelines. Drmies (talk) 15:50, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Wikireader41. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Wikireader41 (talk) 03:30, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"Truth"

Generally speaking, editors who come to Wikipedia with the intention of upholding "the truth" don't last very long, so you're not beginning here very well. I'd suggest that you be a little less concerned about "truth" and more concerned about verification, providing citations from reliable sources and preserving a true neutral point of view. Looking into my crystal ball, I predict that if you continue on in the way you've started, you're going to be indefinitely blocked from editing before you make your 50th edit. Beyond My Ken (talk) 04:52, 7 March 2013 (UTC) Welcome![reply]

Hello, Justice1lover, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one of your contributions does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{Help me}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Drmies (talk) 15:51, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Aafia Siddiqui shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Bbb23 (talk) 18:11, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Codetruth for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Auric talk 01:48, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Drmies (talk) 03:44, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]