User talk:Jeff6741

September 2024

Hi Jeff6741! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Human rights in China several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Human rights in China, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Cordless Larry (talk) 12:47, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK, as you can see, I have modified the content following your previous suggestion to make it more fair and objective. I hope that if you have any problems to modify, please modify on this basis instead of deleting my contribution, This is a contribution that has cost me a lot of time and energy. Could you please think from my perspective? Thank you for your understanding and cooperation! At the same time, I will publish it on the talk page according to your suggestion to seek the advice of others. Jeff6741 (talk) 17:06, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have not made any suggestions, so I think you're confusing me with someone else. I observed you repeatedly reinstating material that had been removed. Please discuss this issue on the relevant talk page to try to reach consensus with other editors. Cordless Larry (talk) 19:41, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Cordless Larry I have discussed this issue on the relevant talk page, but I also think that building Wikipedia is a continuous process of improvement. The reason why I repeatedly reinstate material that had been removed is that if other editors have problems, they can directly modify or improve the information I added, which can save a lot of trouble. Jeff6741 (talk) 20:15, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's not necessarily how things work on Wikipedia. Please see Wikipedia:Edit warring and Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle. Cordless Larry (talk) 20:41, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Amigao (talk) 19:55, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK, but the information I added is true and reliable. There are sources for verification. It took me a lot of time and energy to collect and write this information. Could you please understand the efforts others have made for this and restore the content I added? Thank you very much! Jeff6741 (talk) 01:11, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop edit warring about this and seek consensus for your proposed addition on the article's talk page. If you continue to edit war, you're going to land yourself with a block. Cordless Larry (talk) 18:13, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have already sought consensus on the content of my proposed addition on the article's talk page, and I have not received any objections. So could you please help me restore the information I added? Everything I have added is true and reliable! All has sources available for verification. It took me a lot of time and energy to add this content. I hope you could understand it, instead of deleting the content that I have worked so hard to add every time. I also want to contribute to Wikipedia! Please help me to restore it, thank you very much! Jeff6741 (talk) 10:16, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Consensus needs to be reached, not simply sought. Cordless Larry (talk) 10:24, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

But no one has raised any objections, this should be a tacit consensus that has been reached. Jeff6741 (talk) 01:17, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You probably should thoroughly review WP:CON first. - Amigao (talk) 06:34, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've already viewed WP:CON, and have sought to achieve consensus by publishing content on the talk page, with no objection so far. Hence, in order to seek more consensus, could you please remove the semi-protection of the page I spent a lot of time and effort editing? Jeff6741 (talk) 09:37, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]