User talk:ItsElGato
November 2013
[edit]
This is your last warning. The next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Jessie Rogers, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Warnings through level-3 have been given to User:Mj358, an SPA that has only ever edited Jessie Rogers, with this new user account being an obvious attempt to avoid being blocked for the repeated additions of improperly sourced material on a BLP, making the exact same edits that have been removed multiple times before. Thomas.W talk to me 00:21, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
response
[edit]Thomas.W, I'm not the user Mj358. you are wrong. You are putting wrong information about Jessie Rogers. You write in a derogatory manner and not allowing other users to update the information. You must stop to change the article because it is you who is wrong. I warn you will be blocked because you annoy the other users and because you are providing wrong information and tries to modify article for personal intentions.
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. GedUK 13:24, 13 November 2013 (UTC)Note to reviewing admin: The user seems to be a bit confused, because I haven't added anything to the article (as can be seen in the page history), all I have done is reverting improperly sourced/unsourced edits made by Mj358 (talk · contribs) and ItsElGato. With ItsElGato continuing Mj358's mission after the latter had been given three warnings, making the exact same edits as Mj358 made. Both accounts are single-purpose accounts, editing only Jessie Rogers, and make the same edits (which brings WP:DUCK to mind), in what seems like an attempt to promote Jessie Rogers, a former porn star, and portray her as some kind of new Internet celebrity. Thomas.W talk to me 20:45, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
ItsElGato (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I have been unfairly blocked because I'm correcting the misinformation that tries to impose user Thomas.W in the article Jessie Rogers. The user Thomas.W writes incorrect information and has a derogatory message towards a Jessie Rogers, he writes motivated by personal feelings and attacks Jessie Rogers. I request an administrator of Wikipedia to call Jessie Rogers and finish with the editing of this article ItsElGato (talk) 8:33 pm, Yesterday (UTC+0)
Decline reason:
Due to this legal threat I have increased the block to indefinite. You will not be allowed to edit Wikipedia whilst the threat of legal action remains. Yunshui 雲水 08:38, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Note to reviewing admin I am not user Mj358 but what he wrote is correct. The user Thomas.W writes derogatory information about Jessie Rogers and is promoting discrimination. No one here is authorized to create an article with personal information about Jessie Rogers and anyone else. This article should only be written by Jessie Rogers. All the information that I have written articles are taken from the official website of Jessie Rogers. Why the user Thomas.W tries to write something negative and discriminatory about Jessie Rogers? Thomas. W is motivated by personal interests and attempts to denigrate Jessie Rogers writing lies. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ItsElGato (talk • contribs)
- It seems like we have a language problem here, because the user doesn't seem to understand what I wrote. So let's try a machine translation to Portuguese: "Eu não acrescentou nada ao artigo, tudo o que eu tenho feito é reverter o mal proveniente edições. O artigo foi escrito por outros editores, não eu". Thomas.W talk to me 21:22, 13 November 2013 (UTC) (In case someone wonders why I chose to translate the comment into Portuguese it's because a quick check on the Portuguese WP shows the same type of edits, using the same improper references, being made by IPs geolocating to Brazil on the Portuguese language article about Jessie Rogers. So there's a better than 50% chance that the first language of ItsElGato is Brazilian Portuguese...)
Thomas. W: Why do you suppose that I am Brazilian? You are obsessed with Jessie Rogers because you think I'm Brazilian like her. I speak Spanish because I am Argentine. Let's talk as civilized people. Why you don't want to write the truth and only wants to build a bad Jessie Rogers image? Why you don't want to write that she is an internet personality and was also HUF model. She has only 20 years and long way to go and you only want to create an image of a porn star and she is more than that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ItsElGato (talk • contribs)
- Replying to an editor who either can't or doesn't want to understand even simple English is boring, especially this late in the evening (European time), so I'm outta here... Thomas.W talk to me 22:28, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
- "Let's talk as civilized people"? So you think Brazilians are uncivilized, then? Daniel Case (talk) 00:25, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
Daniel Case: I could never say something like that if I am Argentine and Brazil is a brother country. I am referring only to have a conversation with the user Thomas. W. I am soon to start legal action because Thomas W has insulted and has done damage to Jessie Rogers. Publishing false information to harm someone is humiliating and is also illegal.
For admin
[edit]ItsElGato (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I will not initiate legal action to the editors of Wikipedia, but if the editors of Wikipedia write lies about Jessie Rogers or damage to Jessie Rogers, yes I will. I try to that in the article appears the truth and there is no wrong information to damage Jessie Rogers. There are users trying to edit the article motivated to hurt Jessie Rogers. You can review the history of editions and verify that I tried to leave a neutral editing and not have a message for hurting Jessie Rogers.
Decline reason:
Well, you're still threatening legal action. In addition, I see nothing in the version of the article you edited that is defamatory or prima facie incorrect (though I think that wikilinking "anus" is overlinking); the information you removed is verified in the article, and that she "continues to make a name for herself across the internet", as you put it, is not. You will not be unblocked until you fully retract your threat of legal action. Drmies (talk) 05:44, 17 November 2013 (UTC) Reply to Drmies You did not read all editions history because in this article wrote nasty messages every day for a long time. It is ok. I will not change my position because I believe that it is the only way that do not hurt Jessie Rogers because Wikipedia does not guarantee that here will tell the truth. I am honest and I respect the law and people and I'm not going to allow them to do otherwise.
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Also, there is no doubt in my mind that you created this account after Mj358 was warned for disruptive editing. That account is now also blocked.
Drmies (talk) 05:49, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
- Drmies,I am not user Mj358, I left only the edition of Mj358 because it is better than the edition of the user Thomas.W containing lies and a disparaging and humiliating message to Jessie Rogers.