Jump to content

User talk:Gunther2011

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

QNT

[edit]

Your page QNT has been deleted because it wasn't written as a neutral, encyclopedic article, but as a promotional article with sentences like "[...]devoted team has focused on developing scientifically proven products that help to create superior size, [...]" and so on. The article should be based on third party reliable sources discussing the company and its products, not quotes from the company or its founder. It should cover both positive and negative aspects (if any), criticisms, awards, ... Every claim about being unique, the first, and so on should be sourced to a reliable, independent source, or it will be considered promotion. Fram (talk) 09:48, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Quality Nutrition Technology has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't include references (only a forum/shops), couldn't find any reliable source

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. mabdul 17:39, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Quality Nutrition Technology

[edit]

The article Quality Nutrition Technology has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Advert for unnotable entity

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mean as custard (talk) 11:31, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]