User talk:GobletG

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Albus Dumbledore, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Aleta ^Sing 20:36, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Snape edits

Thanks for all the hard work on the Severus Snape article~ It might be helpful if you can also remember to use the edit summary field, even for minor edits. If you are just copy-editing, then you may want to say "copy edit" in the summary; correcting grammar or spelling mistakes, etc, can likewise be summarised with 'copy edit', 'spelling', and so on. Magidin (talk) 16:04, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Lord Voldemort edits

Note that the sections in question are not, as you state in my talk page book summaries. They are summaries of the appearances of the character in question during the course of the series. Not every HP character page describes them separately. Severus Snape did not have them separately until you attempted to introduce them; Albus Dumbledore does not have them separately either, nor even the Harry Potter page, which puts second through fourth books together, and fifth and sixth together as well. None of them refers to the books by their titles in the Appearances section, though both Hermione Granger and Ron Weasley do; some do, some do not. Since we are not summarising the books, but rather describing the character's role and appearances within the books of the series, it is perfectly reasonable to talk about "first book", and so on. As to "lumping", for many characters the roles in the sundry books are very similar, even if the details vary; and for some the appearances in some of the books are minor (e.g., Snape in the second book). As such, it makes sense from a literary description point-of-view to put them together to highlight this parallelism. In the case of Snape, his role in the plot of the second and third books is minor, and the second one entirely tangential, very different from his role in the first and fifth through seventh novel. Since the roles in the second and third novel are minor, it is debatable whether they should be highlighted by separating them into their own separate section. His role in the fifth and sixth is very similar to one another, but again very different from his role in the seventh novel, so it makes sense to have both the descriptions of the role in the fifth and sixth books together, separate from the rest. Likewise with Voldemort, who plays a very different role in the first three books than he plays in the rest, and who does not even show up in the third book. The sum total of his appearance in the course of those three books is comparable to his appearances in the fourth and fifth. His appearances in the fourth and fifth book are also closely parallel to one another in story structure, so it makes sense to keep them together. At least, it makes sense to me, and it seems to make sense to a lot of other editors, since I was not the first or the only one to revert your changes. In fact, at first I was willing to let them stand for a while and see what others thought (with Snape I merged the extremely minor appearance in the second book with that in the third), but apparently others agree that it is better this way. I do not see any gain in "professional look" with your changes.

As long as I am here: a lot of people don't like the cquotes template, though you seem to favor it inordinately. The consensus seems to be to avoid it for most quotes, so you may want to consider that before once again adding them wholesale. Magidin (talk) 15:31, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:POF Eye.JPG

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:POF Eye.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 15:54, 19 August 2012 (UTC)