User talk:Former user

The work of the United States Government listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The work of the United States Government. Since you had some involvement with the The work of the United States Government redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 01:29, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Stimulation

The article Stimulation has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

All original research since 2004. This seems to be a coatrack article, with not a shred of academic support (reliable sources).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rhadow (talk) 23:58, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Stimulation for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stimulation is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stimulation until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rhadow (talk) 13:42, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]