User talk:Fantinij/sandbox

Test test.

Hi! I think your article is really good and you go in extreme depth. I like how you made it clear and concise.

Reanna.shah (talk) 00:36, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

From your draft, it is very evident that this is a very well researched composition. You've made considerable changes to a wanting section in the original article.

I believe that one area in which you can improve is to better explain all of the terms you use in explaining the classifications, because the paragraph is very difficult to understand without sufficient background knowledge on the reader's part. In that regard, I think that you can keep the same level of intellectual writing while, at the same time, making the paragraph more understandable to someone without any background pertaining to German.

Also, I think that the classification section can be better organized by talking grouping together different types of German. For example, East Germanic and Gothic, West Germanic with English, Old Saxon, Dutch, and Frisian, and lastly, North Germanic with Old Norse and Scandinavian.

Moreover, in the history section, it might be advisable to talk about the runic alphabet because it was the first writing system used by Germanic peoples.

You've done a great job and I hope you succeed. Esotericbubbba (talk) 23:35, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]