User talk:Eblashko

Welcome!

Hello, Eblashko, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Anna Lincoln (talk) 10:43, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Orange280297. I noticed that you recently removed content from Sahar (name) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Orange280297 (talk) 14:32, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Haplotype 35 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Haplotype 35 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Haplotype 35 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

jengod (talk) 06:38, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Valereee (talk) 11:57, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, Eblashko. Just wanted to let you know why another editor reverted your edit at Talk:Zionism. Until you have 500 edits, you can't edit in topics surrounding the Arab-Israeli conflict, which includes not participating in discussions on talk pages. You can made edit requests. I'd recommend at Zionism in particular that you read the entire talk page, including the FAQs, before making edit requests to make sure what you're requesting hasn't been discussed before. Valereee (talk) 12:03, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'd also suggest they read the archives. TarnishedPath^talk 09:26, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Valereee Note that this[1] was not an edit request but a comment, which this editor should not be making. Doug Weller talk 12:23, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Doug Weller, do you mean the comment they left on my user talk at Special:Diff/1251099925? TarnishedPath^talk 02:09, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, that was the wrong diff. This:[2] Doug Weller talk 07:55, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]