Jump to content

User talk:Dumfounded watsD

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


  • Wikipedia is a collaborative environment, so even if your edits are constructive, your edit summaries and messages are not collaborative. Please be more civil toward other editors. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 20:11, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm C.Fred. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Chula–Thammasat Traditional Football Match without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Your edits removed citations. If there's a valid reason for the removal, you need to be clearer with your edit summary so we understand how the article is improved by the edits. Thank you.C.Fred (talk) 20:13, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Dumfounded watsD (talk) 20:14, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Seek & Destroy shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Dbrodbeck (talk) 23:31, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Boku Patalliro!

[edit]

My apologies for an erroneous warning, I am human and make mistakes, however I hope you can be more civil to other editors in the future. Chrissymad ❯❯❯ Talk

My apologies to you. I felt for a moment when seeing the template I was being treated like the common vandal and that somehow it might have looked that way if I were reported. Thanks for easing my mind over it. --Dumfounded watsD (talk) 21:02, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dumfounded watsD, you are invited to the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Dumfounded watsD! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Naypta (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

December 2016

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Trypophobia has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:06, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Edit war warning

[edit]
Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Trypophobia shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Jytdog (talk) 06:12, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copy and pasting

[edit]

We run "copy and paste" detection software on new edits. One of your edits appear to be infringing on someone else's copyright. See also Wikipedia:Copy-paste. We at Wikipedia usually require paraphrasing. If you own the copyright to this material please follow the directions at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials to grant license. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 16:34, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 16:45, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 17:29, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

[edit]
  1. ^ This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
  2. ^ Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

[edit]