User talk:Davoodianiman
November 2022
[edit]Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Woman, Life, Freedom. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Semsûrî (talk) 16:22, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Woman, Life, Freedom, you may be blocked from editing. Semsûrî (talk) 19:41, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Semsûrî (talk) 16:25, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Davoodianiman, you may be blocked from editing. Semsûrî (talk) 22:37, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
[edit]Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Davoodianiman reported by User:Semsûrî (Result: ). Thank you. Semsûrî (talk) 16:36, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Daniel Case (talk) 21:56, 18 November 2022 (UTC){{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Daniel Case (talk) 03:08, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
Davoodianiman (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
The reason for my block is stated as trolling, disruption, or harassment, but I believe this is a misunderstanding. My edits were intended to add factual information. Unfortunately, the editor who blocked my account did so based on my account history rather than the accuracy of my contributions. A review of the page history will reveal a pattern of systematic control aimed at maintaining a singular viewpoint. I respectfully request that my account be unblocked so that I can continue to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. Thank you. Davoodianiman (talk) 23:26, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Decline reason:
After creating your account at the beginning of 2018 you didn't edit until the end of 2022, and did so to focus on a specific article and edit it disruptively. You've now waited a year and a half to request unblocking. This request doesn't adequately address these timing issues or tell what edits you intend to make going forward. 331dot (talk) 07:57, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.