User talk:Bigmikeyy

Notes

Hi! I'm not the Content Expert for your class (Sage (Wiki Ed is), but I noticed that a student from one of my classes moved your work out of your sandbox into a userspace page. I've moved it back, as it had a few things that needed to be addressed before it was moved live.

The first is that the article is written with a favorable, praising bias towards Taylor and his work. Even if this is something that most people would agree with, the article still needs to be neutrally written. Avoid point of view/opinion terms and make sure that everything is as neutral as possible. The second is that the article reads a little like a persuasive essay, with the goal being to get people to see Taylor as relevant and in a positive light. An example of this is the sentence "Ultimately, it is evident that most of Taylor’s writing -- along with McPhee’s narration of Taylor’s viewpoints and suggestions -- is ahead of its time and still applicable today.". This is something that would be seen as subjective to the reader, as someone may disagree with this and the sentence is ultimately written to persuade the reader to see this point of view.

I just wanted to give you a quick head's up - I've pinged Sage so he can see this also. This really is an interesting person you've chosen to write about! Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 14:33, 20 April 2018 (UTC)