User talk:AxelMontclaire

Welcome!

Hello, AxelMontclaire, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! DES ^(talk) 16:57, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, AxelMontclaire. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by DES ^(talk) 17:14, 8 May 2017 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, AxelMontclaire. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by DES ^(talk) 21:29, 8 May 2017 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Words for dates and duration

Wikipedia articles should usually not use terms such as "the present", "Today" and "currently" because the reader has no easy way to know what time is actually referred to. It is not safe to assume that someone will revise the article and keep it up to date at all times. For example suppose that someone wrote about a partially destroyed structure "The rest of the building still stands today." This was correct when written. But 2 years later if the rest of the building is leveled, it would be wrong unless revised. It would be better to write "{{xt|As of May 2017, the rest of the building still stands.}" Or suppose in an article about a musician, someone wrote "He is now working on his next album, with the working title Explosion. If the album is released in 6 months but no one revises the article, a reader might be mislead into thinking the album had not yet come out. Instead one should write: "As of May 2017, he is working on his next album, with the working title Explosion. If someone reads this next January, it will be clear that the album's status is only given as of this month. Similarly, history sections should avoid titles such as "2012-Present", using "2012-2017" or "2012-Present (as of 2017)". think about how the article will read if it is not edited for 5 years, and whether words like "present" will still be accurate.

This note is, of course, prompted by recent edits on Draft:Xposed 4Heads such as this edit. DES ^(talk) 21:47, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Xposed 4Heads concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Xposed 4Heads, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (December 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rusalkii was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:AxelMontclaire/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:AxelMontclaire/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Rusalkii (talk) 03:06, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, AxelMontclaire! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Rusalkii (talk) 03:06, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Xposed 4heads (January 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eagleash was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Xposed 4heads and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Xposed 4heads, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Eagleash (talk) 18:36, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Xposed 4heads

Hello, AxelMontclaire. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Xposed 4heads, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:01, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Xposed 4heads

Hello, AxelMontclaire. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Xposed 4heads".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 18:42, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]