User talk:Ashugaur

Komal Chauhan moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Komal Chauhan, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Maliner (talk) 13:11, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ashugaur

Hello Ashugaur,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Ashugaur for deletion, because it seems to be a test. Did you know that the Wikipedia Sandbox is available for testing out edits?

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 06:45, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ashu gaur for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ashu gaur is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashu gaur until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

----modern_primat ඞඞඞ ^TALK 12:27, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Reference sources in article for IMDB, links are very much genuine. Infact although I also write articles for News, Blogs but never linked those as they were self-written (So just added the Website in Additional Links). Social Projects, Activities and other information posted on the Page very much authentic and Genuine with Print Media References all available on the Official Links Ashu Gaur | Business & Technology Consultant | (talk) 13:55, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

do you get money for editing?

this is just a humble question, please dont hesitate to answer, thanks. ----modern_primat ඞඞඞ ^TALK 12:28, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, editing here on Wiki is not for money or any professional engagement, nor im into content marketing or so Ashu Gaur | Business & Technology Consultant | (talk) 13:37, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks that you asked this question humbly, being a strategist, i believe in the era of AI, Wiki no longer the source of information for future when AI is there to answer. Infact i believe soon there will be innovations implemented on Wiki as well Ashu Gaur | Business & Technology Consultant | (talk) 13:45, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

This is your only warning; if you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising again, as you did at Taraxacum, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. You are using this website for promotion. It mentions your name, which is the same as your Wikipedia username. This is a violation of Wikipedia policy. Reporting you to admin. Zefr (talk) 17:31, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]