Jump to content

User talk:Alan Zheimer

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Hello, Alan Zheimer, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{Help me}} on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Please sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing four tildes (~~~~); our software automatically converts it to your username and the date. We're so glad you're here! Meatsgains(talk) 01:55, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Why have lists when there are categories?

Lists on Wikipedia have three main purposes:

Information:

Lists are a valuable presentation format, especially the structured list. Examples include lists organized chronologically, grouped by theme, glossarized, or annotated.

Navigation:

If a user is browsing without a specific research goal in mind, they would likely use the See also lists embedded in articles. If the user has some general idea of what they are looking for but does not know the specific terminology, the general topics lists (outlines and indices) would be most useful.

Development:

Outlines and indices give an indication of the state of the 'pedia, the articles that have been written, and the articles that have yet to be written (shown by red links).

Like categories, lists are great for keeping track of changes to subject areas, using the Related Changes feature. Unlike categories, lists are centralized, providing direct control over the contents. Lists also allow detection of deletion of pages from them (the list item will "red link"). Another advantage of a list is that changes can be tracked in the page's history, while changes to categories cannot.

To add this auto-updating template to your user page, use {{totd}}

I requested a change of username a few days ago as I don't want my real name to be public. I was told that I would get an email the next day but it didn't happen for some reason. Please change my username to {Anonymous user}.

If Special:GlobalRenameRequest did not work for some reason, you may make a request at WP:CHUS. You probably will need to have a more individualistic name than "Anonymous user", either just adding something to that, or using an alias of some kind. 331dot (talk) 10:24, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Priyanka Reddy rape and murder, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Praxidicae (talk) 16:33, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 09:50, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Alan Zheimer! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 09:50, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 06:42, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Death of Anjali Singh moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Death of Anjali Singh, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Ravensfire (talk) 21:46, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

[edit]

A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. Fram (talk) 13:24, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Fram The page was a report about a series of recent murders, and was not meant to threaten anyone. Alan Zheimer (talk) 13:37, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Please see WP:SUSPECT. Fram (talk) 13:39, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Fram It wasn't a biography of a living person; it was a report about a series of murders. Alan Zheimer (talk) 13:42, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Fram I'll rewrite the page without mentioning the names of the people arrested. Will that be fine? Alan Zheimer (talk) 13:45, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Even then, all you have is a WP:NOTNEWS event of a potential crime (we shouldn't even call it a murder without a conviction). Wikipedia is very conservative when it comes to reporting on such things. The current version of the page will have to be deleted in any case. Fram (talk) 13:51, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Please take a look at Koodathayi cyanide murders to which I also contributed. This is a recent news report on the case: https://www.onmanorama.com/news/kerala/2023/02/05/koodathayi-foresnsic-probe-cyanide-absent.html
How was my page different from this one? Alan Zheimer (talk) 14:26, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If no one has been convicted of murder yet, it should not be called a murder. Murder of George Floyd was not called such until the conviction of those involved. 331dot (talk) 16:44, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I've renamed that article to put "killings" instead of "murders". 331dot (talk) 16:51, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2023 Ujjain rape case for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2023 Ujjain rape case is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2023 Ujjain rape case until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Black Kite (talk) 18:51, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Raj Premi moved to draftspace

[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Raj Premi. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 12:02, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]