User talk:257.122.14,1O

It has been found that you have been using one or more accounts abusively or have edited logged out to avoid scrutiny. Please review the policy on acceptable alternate accounts. In short, alternate accounts should not be used for the purposes of deceiving others into seeing more support for your position. It is not acceptable to use two accounts on the same article, or the same topic area, unless they are publicly and plainly disclosed on both your and the other account's userpage.

Your other account(s) have been blocked indefinitely. This is your only warning. If you repeat this behaviour you will be blocked from editing without further notice. Thank you.

If you're not User:Raxythecat, then you should present your defense here: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Raxythecat. Skyerise (talk) 19:02, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

September 2021

Your account has been blocked indefinitely because the chosen username is a clear violation of our username policy – it is obviously profane, threatens, attacks or impersonates another person, or suggests that you do not intend to contribute positively to the encyclopedia (see our blocking and username policies for more information).

We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, but users are not allowed to edit with inappropriate usernames and we do not tolerate 'bad faith' editing such as trolling or other disruptive behavior. If you think there are good reasons why these don't describe your account, or why you should be unblocked, you are welcome to appeal this block – read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock-un|new username|reason=your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. GeneralNotability (talk) 19:32, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

257.122.14,1O (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Requested username:

new username (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

block reason says I have an offensive name, but it offends nobody. It was actually allowed explicitly in the rules and wiki software 257.122.14,1O (talk) 19:37, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Obviously misleading. Yamla (talk) 20:04, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

I didn't say your name was offensive; that was one of several possibilities listed in the template (I was going for "suggests that you do not intend to contribute positively"). Regarding "allowed explicitly in the rules...", Wikipedia:MISLEADNAME says otherwise. GeneralNotability (talk) 19:47, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

in which way does this name mislead you? Does someone else use a similar name? Come on with it, no hiding secrets!

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

 GeneralNotability (talk) 19:53, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

(uninvolved non-admin comment) the WP:MISLEADNAME violation is that the name resembles an IP address which could cause confusion. Lavalizard101 (talk) 20:26, 17 September 2021 (UTC)