Jump to content

User:Lacrymology

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

my Contributions To Wikipedia

This is mainly for my personal use, but you're free to check out what links here.

I am a firm believer that people should research before asking and in the concept that asking is the best way to get an answer that fits your problem exactly. Therefore, I am a walking contradiction and proud of it.


One of my favourite wiki articles on vandalism


Later I think I am going to post here a list of doubts I have always had and that would like to see answered in a way or another. Maybe even in articles. Anyways, it would be just a matter of filling up space

Ok, I will start this. Feel free to answer to them below.

How do they call Batman on a clear night?

[edit]

I am not talking about the TV series where he has that stupid Bat-phone, but about the old-syled Bat-signal (what the hell is wrong with this encyclopedia that doesn't have articles on these?). How does Batman get called when there is not a cloud in the sky to project the Bat-signal onto?

They use the bat-phone, silly :p Cokehabit 15:38, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
I am talking in the comic books. He doesn't HAVE a bat-phone in those --Lacrymology 11:24, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
A light projected onto the clear sky will still be visible. It won't be as solid a reflection as on a cloudy sky, but it should be enough. I mean, he's Batman, after all. -VJ 03:07, 27 November 2005 (UTC)

Note: The correct answer to this question is: It is Gotham City. It is NEVER a clear night in Gotham --Lacrymology 17:39, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

Where does Superman keep his cape and boots?

[edit]

I don't think this needs further explanation.

The Jedi Dillemma

[edit]

Why is it OK for a Jedi to kill hundreds of stormtroopers but if he kills one of the "bosses" he will turn to the Dark Side?

A Little Dissertation

[edit]
El equilibrio en las cosas es punto fuerte,
necesidad sin exigencias
dadivosidad sin obligación

La fuerza verdadera se encuentra en el comienzo
  pero la continuación
      no
         puede
    ser olvidada
                        al momento del análisis



y el análisis nunca puede dejar
de ser parte
        del fenómeno

Así como el objeto siempre es parte del objeto



y el sujeto no ve sino la parte
     del objeto
que puede comprender
          comprehender
          abarcar
en fin, hacer suya

"y la virgen pasó haciendo
  Ala
  Δ"

  Por eso digo
incluso las cosas mas concretas
                      abstractas

cosas tan concretas como el amor
          abstractas        odio
                            perdón
                            ciudad
                            bastón
                            perro
                            ignorancia
                            amor

no son menos que parcialidades
       más        parcialidades?

Únicas, universales, intangibles, indiscutibles

por eso no se discuten

por eso son verdaderas

                       y falaces

puedo amar lo que es mío
      odiar
      perro

lo que pude observar, asimilar, enmarcar

        y de lo inmarcable

        la inmarcabilidad, nada más
                                menos?

Ahí está la fuerza
en no luchar contra lo individual sino aceptarlo
                          usarlo
                  abrazarlo
            comprehenderlo
        comprenderlo
    aceptarlo



No "crear para todos" generalizando visiones
sino "crear para cada uno"
              acercándose a lo que cada visión BUSCA

Así las abstracciones tienen mas significado
                                 significados
para cada individuo
 lo concreto para la masa.


        en lo abstracto está la fuerza
        en lo concreto hay unión

--Lacrymology 13:16, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

Released into public domain
I agree to release my text and image contributions, unless otherwise stated, into the public domain. Please be aware that other contributors might not do the same, so if you want to use my contributions under public domain terms, please check the multi-licensing guide.