Jump to content

Talk:WASP-13/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: I will review this article against the good article criteria. Tyrol5 [Talk] 20:44, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


Nicely written article, an interesting read.

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    I'm having issues with reference #1; the abstract does not appear to supply cited information.
    Resolved
     – I've found the PDF article
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
    I've no reason to suspect OR, but I can't seem to find cited info in ref #1.
    Resolved
     – I've Found the PDF article
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
    N/A; No images used in article.
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
    Article, overall, looks good to me. Will wait until I hear from you on the journal reference. On hold for seven days. Tyrol5 [Talk] 20:59, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    I've found the PDF and resolved the issue. Everything looks good; glad to list as good article. Tyrol5 [Talk] 21:42, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]