Jump to content

Talk:Veðrfölnir and eagle/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: maclean (talk) 03:10, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see Wikipedia:What is a good article?)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    One grammatical error noted below.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    Short article but I've reviewed the background and I think it covers everything adequately.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
  5. It is stable.
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    2 images, both WPCommons-hosted public domain images.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
Notes
  • "may have been influenced by these Asiatic cosmologies from a northern." - there is a missing word here: from a northern what?
  • "...asks High what other notable facts..." - can an adjective be provided indicating who High is? Like "asks the deity High..." or "asks High, a wise deity,...".
Both issues fixed. Thanks for reviewing the article! :bloodofox: (talk) 03:06, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
OK. Thanks. maclean (talk) 00:48, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]