Jump to content

Talk:The Chronicles of Riddick: Escape from Butcher Bay/GA2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Hi there, I'm MacMed and I am going to be handling this review. Let's get started :) Regards, MacMedtalkstalk 23:13, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

The links are mostly good, there's just a few issues that I listed below. Regards, MacMedtalkstalk 23:35, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • The glitches link in the reception section is a redirect.
  • The Vivendi Universal link in the first paragraph of Development is a redirect.
  • The first Chronicles of Riddick' link in the same section is a redirect to the film article, though I think you meant to link it to an article about the video game franchise. Feel free to correct me if I am wrong about the target you want.
  • The levels link in the Gameplay section is a redirect.
  • The enhanced remake link in the lead is a redirect.

Article

[edit]
  • Could you put something about the development in the lead? It summarizes every section but that.


GA review (see here for criteria)

Everything is good, just waiting on the lead fix.

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
I think I fixed the lead. GamerPro64 (talk) 23:26, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  1. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    I will do these tomorrow.
  2. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  3. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  4. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  5. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  6. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    Congrats.