Jump to content

Talk:The Book of Daniel (album)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

release date

[edit]

I see that the release date is in the past, but as far as I can tell it is not released. Maybe it should be replaced with "TBD" or similar? Franknarf11 (talk) 22:51, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Franknarf11 seems like this article is moot since there's poor sourcing, and lack there of. 2600:1004:B301:1335:EC3B:8D3A:BA37:185 (talk) 15:33, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bad writing (lack of actual sourcing, lack of neutrality, and poor formatting)

[edit]

There has been a great deal of obviously self-aggrandizing, poorly formatted, and unsourced content on the article. My last revision (revision 852110710) was an attempt to rectify this, but someone got mad because I reverted someone else's reversion a couple of times. Hopefully someone who still remembers this article exists (that isn't Danny or a fan) can vouch for me here. 75.102.250.54 (talk) 19:07, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your WP:ALLEGED violations and similar do not help. I will alert the WP:BLP noticeboard, WP:Neutral noticeboard and WP:Christianity to this matter. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 04:51, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
"Oh, they fixed the manual of style almost completely, removed poorly sourced or unsourced content, and updated the information, but they used "alleged" a couple of times, so let's throw the baby out with the bathwater because I want an excuse to push someone out of the community and protect a clearly horribly written and non-neutral page." 107.77.209.90 (talk) 15:24, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Stalking with nonsense, I see. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 07:28, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
If you're gonna deny what I'm saying, the least you could do is respond coherently. 75.102.250.19 (talk) 01:45, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
There is no denial. There is you not paying attention and responding with bitter nonsense. And IP-hopping. The key to a poorly written and/or biased article is not to add even more poor and biased wording. One registered editor so far has worked on the article since I responded above and reported. Getting help on this matter was the appropriate response per the WP:Edit warring and biased wording. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 07:41, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Replacing self-aggrandizing information with neutral information that's more reflective of current information provided is not "bitter nonsense." Using my phone ≠ "IP-hopping." And if you think removing stuff that was literally made up(almost as if... wait for it... it came directly from a primary source? wow, crazy, huh?) is biased and that fixing bizarre formatting is "poorly written and biased," then I dunno what to tell you, big man. All I'm saying is I think this project would go much smoother if you dropped that arrogant and presumptuous attitude and actually heard what people are saying, das all. 75.102.250.19 (talk) 14:08, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Sighs. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 08:22, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Regarding this, I take it that Steam Heat is you. Obviously. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 14:03, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

[edit]

Edit warring reported. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 17:05, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have semi-protected this article for a week. However, if I see any named accounts engaging in clear and obvious edit-warring, they can expect a block. I can't believe the amount of disruption that's gone on here. Is it really worth all this large scale reverting and shouting at each other? Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 00:08, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Steam Heat was WP:CheckUser-blocked by NinjaRobotPirate. And since the latest semi-protection has lifted, the other editor has re-added what Steam Heat removed. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 19:29, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Ponyo did the block, actually. I just revoked Steam Heat's talk page access. I'm not too familiar with this situation, but let me know if there's something I can do to help. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 23:42, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
NinjaRobotPirate, thanks to Ponyo then. And, Ritchie333, the two are back at it. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 05:10, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Nobody's touched the article for three days. If IPs start warring again, ping me and I'll re-protect. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:33, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Ritchie333, NinjaRobotPirate and Ponyo, like I stated at the WP:Edit warring noticeboard, it's a slow edit war with no end in sight. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 19:34, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Right, semi'd for a month. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 20:03, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Jonesey95, see above. It's just the usual edit warring. It will go on forever, it seems. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 10:35, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I don't really care about the content, I just don't want editors to re-introduce broken syntax. I'm just a gnome with an error-tracking category as a hammer, so everything looks like a nail. – Jonesey95 (talk) 11:06, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Commons files used on this page have been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page have been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:52, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]