Jump to content

Talk:Tetraethylmethane

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Why not bend the arms to the left so that it doesn't look like a swastika?

[edit]

Sagittarian Milky Way (talk) 07:57, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Because the result would still be a swastika! (卍 or 卐.)
Because then they couldn't call it nazinonane? -A876 (talk) 23:27, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
At least it could look like one of the Indian swastikas instead of the Nazi one.
I didn't see that, it was fake anyway. Sagittarian Milky Way (talk) 12:02, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Then why not a L-R-L-R pattern? Then it is even less like a swastika, and then the hydrocarbon wouldn't be illegal. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 10:43, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Why not use its IUPAC name

[edit]

This one has an IUPAC name of 3,3-Diethylpentane. Why don't we use that name instead of Tetraethyl methane?

Haneluya (talk) 17:55, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]