Talk:Suzdal

Russia: Visual arts / History / Human geography High‑importance

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the visual arts in Russia task force.
	This article is supported by the history of Russia task force.
	This article is supported by the human geography of Russia task force.

World Heritage Sites Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject World Heritage Sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of World Heritage Sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.World Heritage SitesWikipedia:WikiProject World Heritage SitesTemplate:WikiProject World Heritage SitesWorld Heritage Sites articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

etimologia

river Suzdar near vilage Logdus in Vologda region 176.65.96.7 (talk) 08:57, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Оригинальная марка 975 лет Суздалю Россия 1999.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:54, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reads like a manual

I'm unclear on how this article reads like a manual. Have edited to a more neutral POV. Vanessa hexagon (talk) 04:05, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I agree for the most part, ignoring the Tourism section. I'll open a new discussion for it but I believe the tourism section to be the main issue, as it lists "main sights" which reads more like a travel guide than encyclopedia. I'd recommend a different section, for example on the "protected buildings" or "special buildings" etc. Shibabao (talk) 12:01, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tourism section + sourcing

As I've mentioned in a reply before, I feel like the tourism section is the main issue of this article. It reads more like a travel guide than an encyclopedic article, so I'd recommend renaming it (e.g. "notable buildings") and adjusting the contents a little.

On another topic, most of the sources are in Russian so I cant fact-check them. Im quite busy at the moment but so I'd ask for assistance but should nobody else do it within a few weeks, I might go through the English sources myself. I also wonder if other English sources should be included; most seem to be from Russia Beyond the Headlines, a news portal owned by Russia Today that has been accused of propaganda in the past. If nobody replies to this, I'll assume thats a yes and look for those as well. Shibabao (talk) 12:05, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]