Jump to content

Talk:Sucker Punch (soundtrack)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleSucker Punch (soundtrack) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 16, 2011Good article nomineeListed

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Sucker Punch (soundtrack)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Ashliveslove (talk · contribs) 10:14, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Now it seems good enough. ASHUIND 04:46, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Final Analysis

[edit]
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    Not much concerns here. ASHUIND 18:01, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    No such concerns here. Article has been searched thoroughly for such references. ASHUIND 18:01, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    All such aspects have been covered. Some issues were there but were resolved. ASHUIND 18:01, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
    Fine here.
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    All images are proper till the review date and well captioned. ASHUIND 18:01, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Keep up the good quality of Article. Don't let it delisted.
Regards.
ASHUIND 18:01, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]