Jump to content

Talk:Sonic Battle

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

NPOV

[edit]

In the response section, two lines in particular stuck out as being NPOV, "Sonic Battle is considered by many members of the Sonic fanbase to be one of the best Sonic games since Sonic & Knuckles" and "a Role-Playing-Game should be non-linear and the player may make choices on how the story progresses, while Sonic Battle is clearly linear in its story-line." These statements seem very biased and I petition to have them removed.

Besides, plenty of RPGs are linear. CrossEyed7 17:44, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, many RPG's are linear Tquinnathome1 14:46, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, and linear RPGs are not looked upon favourably by reviewers. The only RPG-like element to Sonic Battle is that you must 'walk' your character around to each battle. If you don't go to the battles in the exact order that the programmers want you to, you don't get anywhere. Sonic Battle is a beat-em-up with an in-depth story, but it's a story that you can't affect in any way.(Harley, 27th October 2006)

Yeah, this is a fighting game, not an RPG. Is there...really any doubt of that. O_o —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.165.54.26 (talk) 23:05, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Response

[edit]

I removed that section. It seemed that a few editors could somehow speak on some, many, and most critic's website's behalf without even giving sources. Fix that up or don't re-add it. 199.126.137.209 09:03, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Series

[edit]

(Xgamer4726 (talk) 16:43, 2 November 2008 (UTC)) can i point out that sonic advance 3 is in the main series yet the plot is about the events of sonic battle and sonic battle isn't. -Unsigned[reply]

Emerl

[edit]

There was a bad link for Emerl on the Sonic X article which I just fixed to direct to his name, which properly forwards to his description on this page. I am not sure if Emerl is a recurring character in the games or not, but I did put a note about him in the E-Series describing his role in Sonic X, which is basically as important to the character development of Cream as E-123 is to Amy Rose (if not more so...). He seems to be the only character hosted on this page. I'm not sure at this point, but I'd consider him nearly a primary character of Sonic X, due to his power level, character development, and causing the E-series and stuff. Do you guys think he deserves his own article or would that receive resistance? I'm hesitant to do it because judging by the history a lot of revisions have been made to the name. I guess the problem is, he may not be recurring, he plays a strong role in this game, yet it's worth mentioning his depiction in Sonic X (of similar tragedy) which isn't really appropriate for the Sonic Battle video game since it doesn't happen in the game, but in the anime. Tyciol (talk) 03:42, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Sonic Battle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:13, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Sonic Battle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:08, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Sonic Battle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:06, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]