Jump to content

Talk:Simp/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 17:55, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 17:55, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Basic stuff and comments

[edit]
  • Try moving references in the lead to the body of the article.
  • exclamation mark  The references in the lead are there because the statements in it have been challenged before; I expect they would be again challenged if the references were removed. jp×g 20:12, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Add a serial comma after "e-girls".
  • Add a comma after the first use of "Too Short".
  • What could possibly help readers in describing "Mr. Simp Sexual"?
  • exclamation mark  The term is usually employed (at least in memes) alongside a sort of character vignette, whose description is otherwise lacking from the article. I chose this one since it's not just a random post, it's a post that is deliberately included as an exemplar of the archetype in an article from a reliable source. jp×g 20:12, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "described use of" → "described the use of"
  • Remove the comma after "written on it".
  • Blue question mark? This one I have a minor objection to, since the sentence is extremely long and has multiple clauses in it. I will still do it if you are totally certain that it should be that way. jp×g 20:07, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "time of announcement" → "time of the announcement"
  • References are already archived.
  • Optional, but linking sources through "|website=" helps readers.

Progress

[edit]
GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·

@Some Dude From North Carolina: Modifications have been made, what do you think? jp×g 20:18, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]