Talk:Roblox
The article Roblox Studio was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 26 August 2024 with a consensus to merge the content into Roblox. If you find that such action has not been taken promptly, please consider assisting in the merger instead of re-nominating the article for deletion. To discuss the merger, please use this talk page. Do not remove this template after completing the merger. A bot will replace it with {{afd-merged-from}}. |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Roblox article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find video game sources: "Roblox" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5Auto-archiving period: 90 days |
This page is not a forum for general discussion about Roblox. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Roblox at the Reference desk. |
|
Pokémon Brick Bronze was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 4 March 2021 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Roblox. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
Material from Roblox was split to List of Roblox games on 2021-05-12 from this version. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted so long as the latter page exists. Please leave this template in place to link the article histories and preserve this attribution. |
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: |
Suggestions
This section is pinned and will not be automatically archived. |
The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.
- Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lead section. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article.[?]
- Consider adding more links to the article; per Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Linking and Wikipedia:Build the web, create links to relevant articles.[?]
- Per MOS:CAPTION, Images should have concise captions.[?]
- As per Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers, dates shouldn't use th; for example, instead of (if such appeared in the article) using January 30th was a great day, use January 30 was a great day.[?]
Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style#Section headings, headings generally should not repeat the title of the article. For example, if the article was Ferdinand Magellan, instead of using the heading ==Magellan's journey==, use ==Journey==.[?]Thinking ofRoblox Studio
- Per criterion 2b of Wikipedia:Featured article criteria and Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Layout#Headings and sections, this article's table of contents (ToC) may be too long – consider shrinking it down by merging short sections or using a proper system of daughter pages as per Wikipedia:Summary style.[?]
- This article may need to undergo summary style, where a series of appropriate subpages are used. For example, if the article is United States, then an appropriate subpage would be History of the United States, such that a summary of the subpage exists on the mother article, while the subpage goes into more detail.[?]
- Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a.[?]
You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, — Yours, Berrely • Talk∕Contribs 08:55, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
- Also, a few of my suggestions:
- Remove citations from lead per WP:CITELEAD
- Try to make the article have a better flow. Some sentences are quite short and can easily be merged with other sentences.
- Expand the infobox: There are many more parameters that can be filled there; there isn't even a link to the website!
- External links should go above references (at least I believe)
- In § Development, it seems to read as more a timeline than an actual paragraph
- There are some sections that can easily be merged, for example § Players, is this really worth a whole section?
- This is just my opinion, but the article seems to go into a bit too much detail.
All of the sets include a code that can be used to redeem virtual items.
- Once again, just some of my opinions, I may be completely wrong! — Yours, Berrely • Talk∕Contribs 09:05, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
- User:Berrely, I've implemented a couple of your suggestions, there is a bit of a problem with LEADCITE, since most of the content in the lead is not actually cited elsewhere in the article, we have to keep the citations there for now, or otherwise it would fail WP:V. I'm not entirely sure how to fix that at the moment, but expanding the "Development" section (which is definitely the weakest one IMO) to include a more general overview of the history of Roblox might help, and would also help with the other problems with that section. I am fairly sure, from looking at a few prominent articles, that References are supposed to be above external links though. Devonian Wombat (talk) 03:46, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
- Devonian Wombat, sorry for replying so late! Apologies I was viewing on mobile and got confused by the references, you are correct on that front. The reason there shouldn't be citations in the lead is that the lead is meant to relay information already said in the article, but this is not a huge problem. Good job on massively improving this article (really comparing the current article from when you first edited it and now is astounding)! — Yours, Berrely • Talk∕Contribs 09:19, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
- I suggest splitting the Erik Cassel article from ROBLOX; Why on earth is Erik Cassel not a separate article? Erik is a vital person to ROBLOX's history, and articles like Alex Balfanz, Uplift Games or Adopt Me! have already been developed without any questioning from the community, so the Erik Cassel page should also be a separate one from ROBLOX. This does not deserve to be a redirect page. It's way more important than that. He also doesn't have a minor appearance like the developers mentioned in this, he literally was one of the creators of the game. MatEditzWiki (talk 15:03, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
- Notability is not inherited. Every topic is evaluated separately. For Erik Cassel to have an article, reliable secondary sourcing that meets WP:GNG must be provided. -- ferret (talk) 15:10, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
- Good source for Erik Cassel's huge involvement in Roblox - [1][2] I believe these two together at minimum are sufficient reliable secondary sources. Countless articles from large outlets mention and build upon this trove of information. Shredux (talk) 23:06, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
- Notability is not inherited. Every topic is evaluated separately. For Erik Cassel to have an article, reliable secondary sourcing that meets WP:GNG must be provided. -- ferret (talk) 15:10, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
- User:Berrely, I've implemented a couple of your suggestions, there is a bit of a problem with LEADCITE, since most of the content in the lead is not actually cited elsewhere in the article, we have to keep the citations there for now, or otherwise it would fail WP:V. I'm not entirely sure how to fix that at the moment, but expanding the "Development" section (which is definitely the weakest one IMO) to include a more general overview of the history of Roblox might help, and would also help with the other problems with that section. I am fairly sure, from looking at a few prominent articles, that References are supposed to be above external links though. Devonian Wombat (talk) 03:46, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
References
- ^ Russell, Melia. "The lesser-known cofounder of $45 billion Roblox was the architect of its blazing success and the 'nicest guy'". Business Insider. Retrieved 2022-03-10.
- ^ "10 Facts You Didn't Know About The Making Of Roblox". TheGamer. 2021-02-06. Retrieved 2022-03-10.
Bloomberg: Roblox's Pedophile Problem
Probably worth mentioning. There's updated figures for things like user numbers, as well. Eldomtom2 (talk) 19:25, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
- Done. Now the article mentions the child predator developer's, who was previously mentioned anonymously in the People Make Games' accusations section, name and game at last. ❤︎PrincessPandaWiki (talk | contribs) 19:56, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
Dynamic pricing controversy
Roblox has added dynamic pricing onto the platform on the price floor (the lowest amount of robux you can purchase something) and it has met controversy since some items can get expensive up to 100 Robux for the cheapest items on the Catalog.
It's probably worth mentioning but there is very little sources except one GameRant article and Roblox slighty mentioning on their Developer Wiki.
Those are both not really good sources to be honest and we should probably wait. Flushedwtf (talk) 00:57, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
SVG Map
Updated the restriction JPG Map with this: File:Map of Roblox restrictions by country.svg
Thanks. OttavianoUrsu (talk) 19:40, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
- –Gluonz talk contribs 21:22, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
- Apparently Roblox just got blocked in Turkey/Turkiye.
Waiting on a reliable source to report on it before I add it to the article(seems to have been added anyways, whatever) you might have to update the SVG map at some point in the future. λ NegativeMP1 17:19, 7 August 2024 (UTC)- I've reverted the revision and I apologize for the inconvenience. LisafBia (talk) 17:23, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
- No worries, it's fine. We just typically wait on a reliable source to report on something like that before making any changes. Should hopefully not take any more than a few hours, though. λ NegativeMP1 17:25, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
- Ok i'm adding Turkey now OttavianoUrsu (talk) 09:06, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
- No worries, it's fine. We just typically wait on a reliable source to report on something like that before making any changes. Should hopefully not take any more than a few hours, though. λ NegativeMP1 17:25, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
- I've reverted the revision and I apologize for the inconvenience. LisafBia (talk) 17:23, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
Should the DynaBlocks logo be added?
Considering there’s no separate page for DynaBlocks, should the DynaBlocks logo be added? If so, there’s a file on WikiMedia Commons. If so, it was added on December 12, 2003 shown from a domain purchase by David B. Baszucki and/or Erik S. Cassel. Newaccount33333 (talk) 15:11, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
outdated information
roblox is not banned in the uae, it has been unbanned for sometime now TTTTRZON (talk) 09:22, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- This article has multiple problems. The outdated ban information as you mentioned, there's no information on UGC being made public, and some other things. While I can't edit it myself, I feel like two thinks could be added. A portion on Ruben Sim's efforts to help the community by getting rid of the disgusting things, and maybe a separate page on lawsuits that Roblox has been involved in. Ruben Sim, I feel, would go well in Inappropriate content and predatory behavior, and as I said before, the lawsuits could be their own page. This article, overall, needs a lot of updating and cleaning up. Erin (SSBelfastFanatic) (talk) 18:29, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- If youcan provide reliable sources that document these recent changes, then I will make the necessary adjustments to the article if they are relevant. But some of these don't seem relevant, especially the Ruben Sim thing, as he's no more than a minor figure that doesn't have any mentions in sources post-lawsuit, and has no place on an article about the platform itself. And I'm not sure what you think needs "cleaning up", the article seems fine besides a few outdated tidbits. λ NegativeMP1 18:44, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Here's stuff on the case between Ruben and Roblox: https://www.jurist.org/news/wp-content/uploads/sites/4/2021/11/Roblox-vs-Ruben-Sim-lawsuit.pdf https://www.businessinsider.com/court-bans-roblox-youtuber-ruben-sim-from-the-game-2022-1 https://www.theverge.com/2021/11/24/22800526/roblox-lawsuit-benjamin-robert-simon-ruben-sim-harassment-rdc-shutdown-terrorism https://www.businessinsider.com/roblox-lawsuit-youtuber-ruben-sim-allegedly-terrorizing-game-platform-2021-11
- On other lawsuits: https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/class-action-lawsuit-against-roblox-corporation-nyse-rblx#:~:text=A%20class%20action%20lawsuit%20was,compensation%20for%20their%20financial%20losses. https://robloxsettlement.com/ https://www.axios.com/2024/03/05/roblox-fortnite-sued-gaming-addiction-children-micro-transactions https://topclassactions.com/lawsuit-settlements/consumer-products/video-games/roblox-class-action-alleges-platform-allows-minors-to-gamble/ https://www.kron4.com/news/bay-area/lawsuit-roblox-exploits-child-labor-creates-addictive-gaming-experiences/
- I could not find any coverage of Ruben's attempts to clean up Roblox besides his own videos, so I'll put that aside unless I can find something else on it. If you want clarification on anything else feel free to just ask! Erin (SSBelfastFanatic) (talk) 18:52, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Also, on public UGC: https://www.metaversemarcom.io/post/how-roblox-s-ugc-changes-impact-ugc-creators https://medium.com/@qprdypmk/roblox-publish-public-ugc-access-af2746b7559e https://www.tweaktown.com/news/97620/roblox-charges-users-publishing-fee-to-sell-custom-creations/index.html Erin (SSBelfastFanatic) (talk) 18:55, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Not sure about the reliability of some of these sources, but the ones that are reliable I'll certainly see if could be implemented into the article in a meaningful manner. Thank you! λ NegativeMP1 19:15, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- If youcan provide reliable sources that document these recent changes, then I will make the necessary adjustments to the article if they are relevant. But some of these don't seem relevant, especially the Ruben Sim thing, as he's no more than a minor figure that doesn't have any mentions in sources post-lawsuit, and has no place on an article about the platform itself. And I'm not sure what you think needs "cleaning up", the article seems fine besides a few outdated tidbits. λ NegativeMP1 18:44, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Old requests for peer review
- B-Class vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia vital articles in Everyday life
- B-Class level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles in Everyday life
- B-Class vital articles in Everyday life
- B-Class video game articles
- High-importance video game articles
- WikiProject Video games articles
- WikiProject Apps
- B-Class apps articles
- Mid-importance apps articles
- WikiProject Apps articles