Jump to content

Talk:Radegund

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

Chaplain

[edit]

There is no evidence that Venantius Fortunatus was Radegund's chaplain or held any official role in relation to Holy Cross. The use of this term here ought to be discussed.

Insufficient Context?

[edit]

Contextualising Radegund might be tricky with out bloating the entry beyond usability. Perhaps a few links to other late c.6th entries would help - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Merovingians - perhaps.

Also including Radegund in the category 'unknown importance saints articles' is frankly obscene. Radegund could well be considered the most important woman of the c.6th & is certainly important enough to be included in wikipedia. Rykalski 20:00, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Canonization

[edit]

Radegund was not officially canonized; she was popularly acclaimed as a saint immediately after her death in the sixth century and her cult was not subject to official proceedings. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kirsa14 (talkcontribs) 02:54, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Radegund. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:35, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]