Jump to content

Talk:R1 RCM

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

PR-like edits

[edit]

Recently I have been reverting similar edits that are coming from a number of IP addresses and accounts. I don't think they are appropriate for Wikipedia because they sound like blatant PR. How blatant? A quick Google shows that some of the text was copied verbatim from this (copyrighted) letter from the president and CEO of the company: http://accretivehealth.com/ongoing-corporate-restructuring-continues-at-accretive-health/. Tdslk (talk) 01:11, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Accretive Health. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:37, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

More conflict-of-interest PR edits

[edit]

Much of this article was blanked on 2017-11-17, removing sourced but negative information about the company. This company appears to have done this before in the past, making conflict of interest edits to the article to replace unpleasant claims with marketing mumbo-jumbo. The name of the company apparently changed recently, so a straight revert won't necessarily work: I don't have time at the moment, but someone needs to restore the claim that are valid for this article. --Closeapple (talk) 20:44, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]